An aesthetic index for evaluation of cleft repair

European Journal of Orthodontics

Volumn 25, Issue 3, 2003, Pages 243-249

  Johnson, Nicola ^a   Sandy, Jonathan ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY DENTAL HOSPITAL   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF BRISTOL   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CHILD; CLEFT LIP; CLEFT PALATE; DENTAL CARE; HEALTH SURVEY; HUMAN; MEDICAL PHOTOGRAPHY; METHODOLOGY; OBSERVER VARIATION; ORAL SURGERY; ORTHODONTICS; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PLASTIC SURGERY; PRESCHOOL CHILD; REPRODUCIBILITY; STANDARD; TOOTH OCCLUSION; VALIDATION STUDY;

CHILD; CHILD, PRESCHOOL; CLEFT LIP; CLEFT PALATE; DENTAL HEALTH SURVEYS; DENTAL OCCLUSION; ESTHETICS, DENTAL; HUMANS; OBSERVER VARIATION; ORAL SURGICAL PROCEDURES; ORTHODONTICS; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT (HEALTH CARE); PHOTOGRAPHY, DENTAL; RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGICAL PROCEDURES; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SURGERY, PLASTIC;

EID: 0141498988     PISSN: 01415387     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/ejo/25.3.243     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Asher-McDade C, Roberts C, Shaw W C, Gallager C 1991 Development of a method for rating nasolabial appearance in patients with clefts of the lip and palate. Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Journal 28: 385-391
2. Asher-McDade C et al. 1992 A six-centre international study of treatment outcome in patients with clefts of the lip and palate: Part 4. Assessment of nasolabial appearance. Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Journal 29: 409-411
3. Atack N, Hathorn I, Mars M, Sandy J R 1997a Study models of five year old children as predictors of surgical outcome in unilateral cleft lip and palate. European Journal of Orthodontics 19: 165-170
4. Atack N, Hathorn I S, Semb G, Dowell T, Sandy J R 1997b A new index for assessing surgical outcome in unilateral cleft lip and palate subjects aged five: reproducibility and validity. Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Journal 34: 242-246
5. Brattstrom V, McWilliam J, Larson O, Semb G 1992 Craniofacial development in children with unilateral clefts of the lip, alveolus, and palate treated according to three different regimes. Assessment of nasolabial appearance. Scandinavian Journal of Plastic, Reconstructive and Hand Surgery 26: 313-319
6. Clinical Standards Advisory Group Cleft Lip and/or Palate Report 1998 Her Majesty's Stationery Office, London, ISBN: 0113221037
7. Eliason M J, Hardin M A, Olin W H 1991 Factors that influence ratings of facial appearance for children with cleft lip and palate. Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Journal 28: 190-194
8. Farkas L G, Hajnis K, Posnick J C 1993 Anthropometric and anthroposcopic findings of the nasal and facial region in cleft patients before and after primary lip and palate repair. Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Journal 30: 1-12
9. Fleiss J L 1986 The design and analysis of clinical experiment. John Wiley and Sons, New York, pp. 1-35
10. Howells D J, Shaw W C 1985 The validity and reliability of ratings of dental and facial attractiveness for epidemiological use. American Journal of Orthodontics 88: 402-408
11. Landis J R, Koch G G 1977 The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics 33: 159-174
12. Morrant D G, Shaw W C 1996 Use of standardised video recordings to assess cleft surgery outcome. Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Journal 33: 134-142
13. Morris H L, Bardach J 1989 Cleft lip and palate related disorders: issues for future research of high priority. Cleft Palate Journal 26: 141-144
14. Richman L 1976 Behaviour and achievement of the cleft palate child. Cleft Palate Journal 13: 4-10
15. Richman L C 1997 Facial and speech relationships to behaviour of children with clefts across three age levels. Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Journal 34: 390-395
16. Richman L C, Holmes C S, Eliason M J 1985 Adolescents with cleft lip and palate: self perceptions of appearance and behaviour related to personality adjustment. Cleft Palate Journal 22: 93-96
17. Roberts C T, Richmond S 1997 The design and analysis of reliability studies for the use of epidemiological and audit indices in orthodontics. British Journal of Orthodontics 24: 139-147
18. Roberts C T, Semb G, Shaw W C 1991 Strategies for the advancement of surgical methods in cleft lip and palate. Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Journal 28: 141-149
19. Sandy J R et al. 1998 The Clinical Standards Advisory Group (CSAG) cleft lip and palate study. British Journal of Orthodontics 25: 21-30
20. Schneiderman C R, Harding J B 1984 Social ratings of children with cleft lip by school peers. Cleft Palate Journal 21: 219-223
21. Shaw W C 1981 The influence of children's dentofacial appearance on their social attractiveness as judged by peers and lay adults. American Journal of Orthodontics 79: 399-415
22. Shaw W C, Rees G, Dawe M, Charles C R 1985 The influence of dentofacial appearance on the social attractiveness of young adults. American Journal of Orthodontics 87: 21-26
23. Thomas P T, Turner S R, Rumsey N, Dowell T, Sandy J R 1997 Satisfaction with facial appearance among subjects affected by a cleft. Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Journal 34: 226-231
24. Tobiasen J M 1987 Social judgements of facial deformity. Cleft Palate Journal 24: 323-327
25. Tobiasen J M 1991 Commentary. Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Journal 28: 193-194
26. Tobiasen J M, Hiebert J M, Boraz R A 1991 Development of scales of severity of facial impairment. Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Journal 28: 419-424
27. Vegter F, Mulder J W, Hage J J 1997 Major residual deformities in cleft patients: a new anthropometric approach. Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Journal 34: 106-110
28. Williams H B 1968 A method of assessing cleft lip repairs: comparison of LeMesurier and Millard techniques. Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery 41: 103-107