Simulated computer-mediated/video-interactive distance learning: A test of motivation, interaction satisfaction, delivery, learning & perceived effectiveness

Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication

Volumn 6, Issue 3, 2001, Pages

  Guzley, Ruth M ^a   Avanzino, Susan ^a   Bor, Aaron ^a  

^a CALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COMPUTER AIDED INSTRUCTION; IMAGE COMMUNICATION SYSTEMS; INTERACTIVE COMPUTER SYSTEMS; STUDENTS; VIDEO RECORDING; VOICE/DATA COMMUNICATION SYSTEMS;

AUDIO COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY; DISTRIBUTED TUTORED VIDEO INSTRUCTION (DTVI); VIDEOTAPED LECTURES;

DISTANCE EDUCATION;

EID: 3242749759     PISSN: 10836101     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1083-6101.2001.tb00122.x     Document Type: Review

References (52)

1. Abrahamson, C. E. (1998). Issues in interactive communication in distance education. College Student Journal, 32 (1), 33-42.
2. Albrektson, J. R. (1995). Mentored online seminar: A model for graduate-level distance learning. T.H.E. Journal, 23 (3), 102-105.
3. Althaus, S. L. (1997). Computer-mediated communication in the university classroom: An experiment with on-line discussions. Communication Education, 46 (3), 158-174.
4. Beller, M., & Or, E. (1998). The crossroads between lifelong learning and information technology: A challenge facing leading universities. Journal of Computer Mediated Communication, 4 (2). [Online]. Available: http://www.ascusc.org/jcmc/vol4/issue2/beller.html.
5. Benbunan-Fich, R., & Hiltz, S. R. (1999). Educational applications of CMCS: Solving case studies through asynchronous learning networks. Journal of Computer Medicated Communication, 4 (3). [Online]. Available: http://www.ascusc.org/jcmc/vol4/issue3/benbunan-fich.html.
6. Bork, A. (1995). Distance learning and interaction: Toward a virtual learning institution. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 4 (3), 227-244.
7. Bothun, G D. (1998). Distance education: Effective learning or content-free credits? Cause/Effect, 21 (2), 28-31, 36-37.
8. Christophel, D. M. (1990). The relationship among teacher immediacy behaviors, student motivation, and learning. Communication Education, 39, 323-340.
9. Clark, R. E., & Salomon, G. (1986). Media in teaching. In M. C. Wittrock (Ed), Handbook of research on teaching (3rd ed.)(pp. 464-478). New York: McMillan.
10. Coughlin, E. K. (1996). The human side of technology: Stanford professors study how people respond to computers and television. The Chronicle of Higher Education, XLII (27), pp. A7,A17.
11. Dede, C. J. (1990). The evolution of distance learning: Technology-mediated interactive learning. Journal of Research on Computing in Education, 22 (1), 247-284.
12. DeVries, Y. E., & Wheeler, C. (1996). The interactivity component of distance learning implemented in an art studio course. Education, 117(2), 180-184.
13. Dunbar, N. E., & Selby, K. M. (November 1996). Effects of gender and previous experience on students' perceptions of video-teleconferencing. Paper presented at the Speech Communication Association Annual Convention (Instructional Development Division), San Diego, CA.
14. Eddy, J., Burnett, J., Spaulding, D., & Murphy, S. (1997). Technology assisted education. Education, 117(3), 478-480.
15. Freitas, F. A., Myers, S. A., & Avtgis, T. A. (1998). Student perceptions of instructor immediacy in conventional and distributed learning classrooms. Communication Education, 47 (4), 366-372.
16. Frymier, A. B. & Shulman, G. M. (1995). What's in it for me?": Increasing content relevance to enhance students' motivation. Communication Education, 44 (1), 40-50.
17. Gant, L. P. (1996). Lessons in developing distance learning. Performance and Instruction, 35 (2), 22-25.
18. Gerard, G., & Sleeth, R. G. (1996). Technology-assisted instruction in business schools: Measured effects on student attitudes, expectations and performance. International Journal of Instructional Media, 23 (3), 239-245.
19. Greenhalgh, T. (2001). Computer assisted learning in undergraduate medical education. British Medical Journal, 322 (7277), 40-45.
20. Greer, J., & Bull, S. (2000). Computer support for collaboration in medical education. Clinical & investigative Medicine, 23 (4), 270-275.
21. Guerrero, L. K. & Miller, T. A. (1998). Associations between nonverbal behavioral and initial impressions of instructor competence and course content in videotaped distance education courses. Communication Education, 47(1), 30-42.
22. Hall, K. (1995). Learning modes: An investigation of perceptions in five Kent classrooms. Educational Research, 37(1), 21-32.
23. Haynes, K. J. M. & Dillon, C. (1992). Distance education: Learning outcomes, interaction, and attitudes. Journal of Education for Library and Information Science, 33 (1), 35-45.
24. Haythornthwaite, C., Kazmer, M. M., & Robbins, J. (2000). Community development among distance learners: Temporal and technological dimensions. Journal of Computer Medicated, 4 (2), [Online]. Available: http://www.ascusc. org/jcmc/vol6/issue1/haythornthwaite.html.
25. Hedberg, J. G. & McNamara, S. E. (1989). The human-technology interface: Designing for open and distance learning. Educational Media International, 26 (2), 73-81.
26. Hiltz, S. R. (1993). Correlates of learning in a virtual classroom. International Journal of Man-Machine Studies, 39, 71-98.
27. Hodgson, B. (1993). Key terms in open and distance learning. London: Kogan Page.
28. Hollingshead, A. B. (1996). Information suppression and status persistence in group decision making: The effects of communication media. Human Communication Research, 23 (2), 193-219.
29. Johnson, D. W. & Johnson R. T. (1994). Cooperation and the use of technology. In D. H. Jonassen (ed.), Handbook of research for educational communications and technology(1017-1044). New York: Simon and Schuster.
30. Jones-Delcorde, D. H. (1995). Distance education: Promoting a continuous learning culture. The Canadian Manager, 20 (1), 27-28.
31. Keegan, D. (1990). Foundations of distance education. London: Routledge.
32. Klimczak, A. K. & Wedman, J. F. (1997). Instructional design project success factors: An empirical basis. Educational Technology Research & Development, 45 (2), 75-83.
33. Kuehn, S. A. (1994). Computer-mediated communication in instructional settings: A research agenda. Communication Education, 43(2), 171-183.
34. LaRose, R., Gregg, J., & Eastin, M. (1998). Audiographic telecourses for the web: An experiment. Journal of Computer Medicated Communication, 4 (2). [Online]. Available: http://www.ascusc.org/jcmc/vol4/issue2/larose.html.
35. Lundberg, D. J. (2000). Integrating on-line technology into counseling curricula: Emerging humanistic factors. Journal of Humanistic Counseling Education & Development, 38(3), 142-152.
36. Martin, B. L. & Bramble, W. J. (1996). Designing effective video teletraining instruction: The Florida teletraining project. Educational Technology Research & Development, 44 (1), 85-99.
37. Martinez, Jr., R., & Sweger, B. (1996). Plugged in: Long distance technology offers benefits and drawbacks to teacher education programs. Vocational Education Journal, 71 (3), 30-31.
38. Mazur, J. M. (2000). Applying insights from film theory and cinematic technique to create a sense of community and participation in a distributed video environment. Journal of Computer Mediated Communication, 5 (4). [Online]. Available: http://www.ascusc.org/jcmc/vol5/issue4/mazur.htm.
39. Meisel, S., & Marx, B. Screen to screen versus face to face: Experiencing the difference in management education. Journal of Management Education, 23 (6), 719-732.
40. Neal, L., Ramsay, J., & Preece, J. (1997). Distance learning: A CH197 special interest group. SIGCHI Bulletin, 29 (4), 76-78.
41. Newlands, D., & McLean, A. (1996). The potential of live teacher supported distance learning: A case-study of the use of audio conferencing at the University of Aberdeen. Studies in Higher Education, 21 (3), 285-297.
42. Olaniran, B. A., Savage, G. T., & Sorenson, R. L. (1996). Experimental and experiential approaches to teaching face-to-face and computer-mediated group discussion. Communication Education, 45 (3), 245-259.
43. Scott, C. R. & Rockwell, S. C. (1997). The effect of communication, writing, and technology apprehension on likelihood to use new communication technologies. Communication Education. 46 (1), 44-62.
44. Seale, J. K., & Cann, A. J. (2000). Reflection on-line or off-line: The role of learning technologies in encouraging students to reflect. Computers & Education, 34, 309-320.
45. Sipusic, M. J., Pannoni, R. L., Smith, R. B., Dutra, J., Gibbons, J. F. & Sutherland, W. R. (1999, January). Virtual collaborative learning: A comparison between face-to-face tutored video instruction (TVI) and distributed tutored video instruction (DTVI) (SMLI TR-99-72). Palo Alto, CA: Sun Microsystems Laboratories.
46. Shelton, M. W., Lane, D. R., & Waldhart, E. S. (1999) A review and assessment of national educational trends in communication instruction. Communication Education, 48 (3), 228-238.
47. Swan, M. K. (1995). Effectiveness of distance learning courses: Students' perceptions [on-line]. Available: http://www.ssu.missouri.edu/ssu/AgEd/NAERM/ 95Title.htm
48. Thach, E. C. & Murphy, K. L. (1995). Competencies for distance education professionals. Educational Technology Research & Development, 43 (1), 57-79.
49. The Kansas Project. (2001). [Online}. Available: http://www.sun.com/ research/ics/kansas.html.
50. Veerman, A. L., Andriessen, J. E. B., & Kanselaar. (2000). Learning through synchronous electronic discussion. Computers & Education, 34, 269-290.
51. Wang, S., & Sleeman, P.J. (1993). Computer-assisted instruction effectiveness ... A brief review of the research. International Journal of Instructional Media, 20 (A), 333-349.
52. Zhang, P. (1998). A case study on technology use in distance learning. Journal of Research on Computing in Education, 30(4), 398-419.