Constraints on view combination: Effects of self-occlusion and differences among familiar and novel views

Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance

Volumn 31, Issue 1, 2005, Pages 110-121

  Wong, Alan C N ^a   Hayward, William G ^b  

^a VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b CHINESE UNIVERSITY OF HONG KONG   (Hong Kong)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; HUMAN; PERCEPTION; PHYSIOLOGY; REACTION TIME; RECOGNITION; VISION;

HUMANS; PERCEPTUAL MASKING; REACTION TIME; RECOGNITION (PSYCHOLOGY); VISUAL PERCEPTION;

EID: 14544281561     PISSN: 00961523     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1037/0096-1523.31.1.110     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Biederman, I. (1987). Recognition-by-components: A theory of human image understanding. Psychological Review, 94, 115-147.
2. Biederman, I., & Gerhardstein, P. C. (1993). Recognizing depth-rotated objects: Evidence and conditions for three-dimensional viewpoint invariance. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 21, 1506-1514.
3. Biederman, I., & Gerhardstein, P. C. (1995). Viewpoint-dependent mechanisms in visual object recognition: A critical analysis. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 19, 1162-1182.
4. Bülthoff, H. H., & Edelman, S. (1992). Psychophysical support for two-dimensional view interpolation theory of object recognition. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA, 89, 60-64.
5. Edelman, S., & Bülthoff, H. H. (1992). Orientation dependence in the recognition of familiar and novel views of three-dimensional objects. Vision Research, 32, 2385-2400.
6. Hayward, W. G., & Tarr, M. J. (1997). Testing conditions for viewpoint invariance in object recognition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 23, 1511-1521.
7. Hayward, W. G., & Williams, P. (2000). Viewpoint dependence and object discriminability. Psychological Science, 11, 7-12.
8. Hummel, J. E. & Stankiewicz, B. J. (1998). Two roles for attention in shape perception: A structural description model of visual scrutiny. Visual Cognition, 5, 49-79.
9. Kourtzi, Z., & Shiffrar, M. (1999). The visual representation of three-dimensional, rotating objects. Acta Psychologica, 102, 265-292.
10. Lawson, R. (1999). Achieving visual object constancy across plane rotation and depth rotation. Acta Psychologica, 102, 221-245.
11. Lawson, R., Humphreys, G. W., & Watson, D. G. (1994). Object recognition under sequential viewing conditions: Evidence for viewpoint-specific recognition procedures. Perception, 23, 595-614.
12. Liu, Z. (1996). Viewpoint dependency in object representation and recognition. Spatial Vision, 9, 491-521.
13. Logothetis, N. K., & Pauls, J. (1995). Psychophysical and physiological evidence for viewer-centered object representations in the primate. Cerebral Cortex, 3, 270-288.
14. Marr, D. (1982). Vision. New York: Freeman.
15. Newell, F. N. (1998). Stimulus context and view dependence in object recognition. Perception, 27, 47-68.
16. Newell, F. N., & Findlay, J. M. (1997). The effect of depth rotation on object identification. Perception, 26, 1231-1257.
17. Perrett, D. L., Oram, M. W., & Ashbridge, E. (1998). Evidence accumulation in cell populations responsive to faces: An account of generalization of recognition without mental transformations. Cognition, 67, 111-145.
18. Poggio, Y., & Edelman, S. (1990, January 18). A network that learns to recognize three-dimensional objects. Nature, 343, 263-266.
19. Schwoebel, J., & Srinivas, K. (2000). Recognizing objects seen from novel viewpoints: Effects of view similarity and time. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 26, 915-928.
20. Srinivas, K., & Schwoebel, J. (1998). Generalization to novel views from view combination. Memory & Cognition, 26, 768-779.
21. Tanaka, K. (1996). Inferotemporal cortex and object vision. Annual Review of Neuroscience, 19, 109-139.
22. Tarr, M. J., & Bülthoff, H. H. (1995). Is human object recognition better described by geon structural descriptions or by multiple views? Comment on Biederman and Gerhardstein (1993). Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 21, 1494-1505.
23. Tarr, M. J., & Gauthier, I. (1998). Do viewpoint-dependent mechanisms generalize across members of a class? [Special issue]. Cognition, 67, 71-108.
24. Tarr, M. J., & Kriegman, D. J. (2001). What defines a view? Vision Research, 41, 1981-2004.
25. Tarr, M. J., & Pinker, S. (1989). Mental rotation and orientation-dependence in shape recognition. Cognitive Psychology, 21, 233-282.
26. Tarr, M. J., Williams, P., Hayward, W. G., & Gauthier, I. (1998). Three-dimensional object recognition is viewpoint dependent. Nature Neuroscience, 1, 275-277.
27. Wang, G., Tanaka, K., & Tanifuji, M. (1996, January 14). Optical imaging of functional organization in monkey inferotemporal cortex. Science, 272, 1665-1668.
28. Williams, P., & Tarr, M. J. (1999). RSVP: Experimental control software for MacOS [Computer software]. Retrieved September 1, 1999, from http://www.cog.brown.edu/~tan/RSVP/