Viewpoint dependency in object representation and recognition

Spatial Vision

Volumn 9, Issue 4, 1996, Pages 491-521

  Liu, Zili ^a  

^a NEC LABORATORIES AMERICA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COMPUTATIONAL METHODS; COMPUTER VISION; DATA STORAGE EQUIPMENT; LEARNING SYSTEMS; THREE DIMENSIONAL COMPUTER GRAPHICS;

OBJECT REPRESENTATION; THREE-DIMENSIONAL OBJECTS; VIEWPOINT DEPENDENCY;

OBJECT RECOGNITION;

ARTICLE; HUMAN; LEARNING; ORIENTATION; PATTERN RECOGNITION; PHYSIOLOGY; REACTION TIME; VISION;

HUMANS; LEARNING; ORIENTATION; PATTERN RECOGNITION, VISUAL; REACTION TIME; VISUAL PERCEPTION;

EID: 0029665186     PISSN: 01691015     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1163/156856896x00222     Document Type: Article

References (43)

1. Ball, K. and Sekuler, R. (1987). Direction-specific improvement in motion discrimination. Vision Res. 27, 953-965.
2. Bartram, D. J. (1974). The role of visual and semantic codes in object naming. Cognit, Psychol. 6, 325-356.
3. Bartram, D. J. (1976). Levels of coding in picture-picture comparison tasks. Memory and Cognit. 4, 593-602.
4. Basri, R., Costa, L., Geiger, D. and Jacobs, D. W. (1994). Determining the similarity of deformable shapes. In: IEEE Workshop on Physics-Based Modeling in Computer Vision, 135-143.
5. Bennett, B. M., Huffman, D. D. and Prakash, C. (1993). Recognition polynomials. J. Opt. Soc. Am. A. 10, 759-764.
6. Biederman, I. (1987). Recognilion-by-components: A theory of human image understanding. Psychol. Rev. 94, 115-147.
7. Biedemnan, I. and Gerhardstein, P. C (1993). Recognizing depth-rotated objects: Evidence and conditions for three-dimensional viewpoint invariance. J. Exp. Psychol : Human Percept. Perform. 19. 1162-1182.
8. Biederman, I. and Gerhardstein, P. C. (1995) Viewpoint dependent mechanisms in visual object recognition: a critical analysis. J. Exp. Psychol.: Human Percept. Perform. 21, 1506-1514.
9. Binford, T. O. (1971). Visual perception by computer. In: The IEEE Conference on Systems and Control. Miami, Florida.
10. Bruce, T. and Humphreys, G. W. (1994). Recognizing objects and faces. Visual Cognit. 1, 141-180.
11. Bülthoff, H. H. and Edelman, S. (1992). Psychophysical support for a two-dimensional view interpolation theory of object recognition. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 89, 60-64.
12. Bülthoff, H. H., Edelman, S. Y. and Tarr, M. J. (1995). How are three-dimensional objects represented in the brain? Cerebral Cortex 5, 247-260.
13. Corballis, M. C. (1988). Recognition of disoriented shapes. Psychol. Rev. 95, 115-123.
14. Edelman, S. (1995). Representation of similarity in three-dimensional object discrimination. Neural Comput. 7, 408-423.
15. Edelman, S. and Bülthoff, H. H. (1992). Orientation dependence in the recognition of familiar and novel views of three-dimensional objects. Vision Res. 32, 2385-2400.
16. Ellis, R., Allport, D. A., Humphreys, G. W. and Collis, J. (1989). Varieties of object constancy. Q. J. Exp. Psychol. A 41, 775-796.
17. Foster, D. H. (1991). Operating on spatial relations. In: Pattern Recognition by Man and Machine. R. J. Watt (Ed.). Macmillan Press, Basingstoke, UK, pp. 53-54.
18. Hummel, J. E. and Biederman, I. (1992). Dynamic binding in a neural network for shape recognition. Psychol. Rev. 99, 480-517.
19. Humphrey, G. K and Khan, S. C. (1992). Recognizing novel views of three-dimensional objects. Can J. Psychol 46, 170-190.
20. Jolicoeur, P. (1985). The time to name disorientated natural objects. Memory Cognit. 13, 289-303.
21. Jolicoeur, P. (1990) Identification of disorientated objects: A dual-systems theory. Mind and Language 5, 387-410.
22. Jolicoeur, P., Gluck, M. and Kosslyn, S. M. (1984). Pictures and names: Making the connection. Cognit Psychol. 16, 211-216.
23. Koenderink, J. J. (1990). Solid Shape. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
24. Kurbat, M. A. (1995). Structural description theories: Is RBC/JIM a general-purpose theory of human entry-level object recognition? Perception 23, 1339-1368.
25. Lawson, R., Humphreys, G. W. and Watson, D. G. (1994). Object recognition under sequential viewing conditions: evidence for viewpoint-specific recognition procedures. Perception 23, 595-614.
26. Liu, Z., Kersten, D. and Knill, D. C. (1995a). Structural organization improves object discrimination. Technical report, NEC Research Institute.
27. Liu, Z., Knill, D. C. and Kersten, D. (1995b) Object classification for human and ideal observers. Vision Res. 35, 549-568.
28. Marr, D. and Nishihara, H. K. (1978). Representation and recognition of the spatial organization of three-dimensional shapes. Proc. Roy. Soc. Land. B 200, 269-294.
29. Marr, D. (1982). Vision. W. H. Freeman and Company, New York, NY; Oxford, England.
30. Minsky, M. (1975). A framework for representing knowledge. In: The Psychology of Computer Vision. P. H. Winston (Ed.). McGraw-Hill, New York, pp. 211-277.
31. Murray, J. E., Jolicoeur, P., McMulIer, P. A. and Ingleton, M. (1993). Orientation-invariant transfer of training in the identification of rotated natural objects. Memory Cognit. 21, 604-610.
32. Palmer, S., Rosch, E. and Chase, P. (1981). Canonical Perspective and the Perception of Objects. In: Attention and Performance IX. A. Baddeley (Ed.). Lawrence Erlbaum, Hillsdale, New Jersey, pp. 135-151.
33. Rock, I. and DiVita, J. (1987). A case of viewer-centered object perception. Cognit. Psychol. 19, 280-293.
34. Rock, I., Schreiber, C. and Ro, T. (1994). The dependence of two-dimensional shape perception on orientation. Perception 23, 1408-1426.
35. Rosch, E., Mervis, C. B., Gray, W D., Johnson, D. M. and Boyes-Braem, P. (1976). Basic objects in natural categories. Cognit. Psychol 21, 233-282.
36. Shepard, R. N. and Cooper, L. A (1982). Mental Images and Their Transformations. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
37. Srinivas, K. (1993). Perceptual specificity in nonverbal priming. J. Exp. Psychol.: Learning, Memory and Cognition 19, 582-602.
38. Tarr, M. J. (1995). Rotating objects to recognize them: a case study on the role of viewpoint dependency in the recognition of three-dimensional objects. Psychonomic Bull. Rev. 2, 55-82.
39. Tarr, M. J. and Búlthoff, H. H (1995). Is human object recognition better described by geon-structuraldescriptions or by multiple-views? J. Exp. Psychol.: Human Percept. Perform. 21, 1494-1505.
40. Tarr, M. J. and Pinker, S. (1989). Mental rotation and orientation dependence in shape recognition. Cognit. Psychol. 21, 233-283.
41. Tarr, M. J., Hayward, W. G., Gauthier, I and Williams, P. (1994) Geon recognition is viewpoint dependent. The 35th Annual Meeting of the Psychonomic Society, St Louis, MO.
42. Ullman, S. (1989). Aligning pictorial descriptions: An approach to object recognition. Cognition 32, 193-254.
43. Ullman, S. and Basri, R. (1989). Recognition by linear combinations of models. Technical report, MIT, 1152.