Resource consultation and collaboration in gifted education

Psychology in the Schools

Volumn 38, Issue 5, 2001, Pages 457-466

  Landrum, Mary S ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0035438192     PISSN: 00333085     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/pits.1034     Document Type: Article

References (17)

1. Archambault, F.X., Westberg, K.L., Brown, S.W., Hallmark, B.W., Zhang, W., & Emons, C.L. (1993). Classroom practices used with gifted third and fourth grade students. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 16, 103-119.
2. Armstrong, D., Kirschenbaum, R., & Landrum, M.S. (1999). Resource consultation model in gifted education to support talent development in today's inclusive schools. Gifted Child Quarterly, 43, 39-47.
3. Bauwens, J., & Hourcade, J. (1991). Making co-teaching a mainstreaming strategy. Preventing School Failure, 35, 19-24.
4. Brown, D., Pryzwansky, W.B., & Schulte, A.C. (2001). Psychological consultation: Introduction to theory and practice (5th ed.). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
5. Curtis, M.J., Curtis, V.A., & Graden, J.L. (1988). Prevention and early intervention assistance programs. School Psychology International, 9, 257-264.
6. Curtis, M.J., & Meyers, J. (1985). Best practices in school-based consultation. In A. Thomas & J. Grimes (Eds.). Best practices in school psychology. Washington, DC: National Association of School Psychologists.
7. Dettmer, P. (1993). Gifted education: Window of opportunity. Gifted Child Quarterly, 27, 92-97.
8. Hertzog, N.B. (1998, January/February). The changing role of the gifted education specialist. Teaching Exceptional Children, 39-43.
9. Landrum, M.S. (1994, April). A study of the nature of effective resource consultation in the education of the gifted. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New Orleans, LA.
10. Landrum, M.S. (2001). An evaluation of the Catalyst Program: Consultation and collaboration in gifted education. Gifted Child Quarterly, 43, 139-151.
11. Pugach, M.C., & Johnson, L.J. (1989). The challenge of implementing collaboration between general and special education. Exceptional Children, 56, 232-235.
12. Purcell, J.H., & Leppien, J.H. (1998). Building bridges between general practitioners and educators of the gifted: A study of collaboration. Gifted Child Quarterly, 42, 172-181.
13. Reis, S.M. (1983). Creating ownership in gifted and talented programs. Roeper Review, 5, 20-23.
14. Renzulli, J.S., & Purcell, J.H. (1996). Gifted education: A look around and a look ahead. Roeper Review, 18, 173-178.
15. Renzulli, J.S., & Reis, S.M. (1994). Research related to the school-wide enrichment triad model. Gifted Child Quarterly, 38, 7-20.
16. Schack, G.D. (1996). All aboard or standing on the shore? Gifted education and the educational reform movement. Roeper Review, 18, 190-197.
17. Ward, S.B., & Landrum, M.S. (1994). Resource consultation: An alternative service delivery model for gifted education. Roeper Review, 16, 275-279.