Evidence that the relations between novelty-induced activity, locomotor stimulation and place preference induced by cocaine qualitatively depend upon the dose: A multiple regression analysis in inbred C57BL/6J mice

Behavioural Brain Research

Volumn 158, Issue 2, 2005, Pages 201-210

  Brabant, Christian ^a   Quertemont, Etienne ^a   Tirelli, Ezio ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF LIÈGE   (Belgium)

Author keywords

C57BL 6J mice; Cocaine; Conditioned place preference; Locomotion; Multiple regression analysis; Novelty

Indexed keywords

COCAINE;

ANIMAL BEHAVIOR; ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; CORRELATION ANALYSIS; DOSE RESPONSE; INBRED STRAIN; LOCOMOTION; MALE; MOUSE; MULTIPLE REGRESSION; NONHUMAN; PLACE PREFERENCE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS; SCORING SYSTEM;

EID: 13444278589     PISSN: 01664328     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.bbr.2004.08.020     Document Type: Article

References (47)

1. R.A. Bevins, J.E. Klebaur, and M.T. Bardo Individual differences in response to novelty, amphetamine-induced activity and drug discrimination in rats Behav Pharmacol 8 1997 113 123
2. R.G. Browne, and D.S. Segal Behavioral activating effects of opiates and opioid peptides Biol Psychiat 15 1980 77 86
3. R.J. Carey, G. DePalma, and E. Damianopoulos Response to novelty as a predictor of cocaine sensitization and conditioning in rats: a correlational analysis Psychopharmacology 168 2003 245 252
4. C.L. Cunningham, S.D. Dickinson, N.J. Grahame, D.M. Okorn, and C.S. McMullin Genetic differences in cocaine-induced conditioned place preference in mice depend on conditioning trial duration Psychopharmacology 146 1999 73 80
5. H. De Wit, E.H. Uhlenhuth, and C.E. Johanson Individual differences in the reinforcing and subjective effects of amphetamine and diazepam Drug Alcohol Depend 16 1986 341 360
6. V. Deroche, P.V. Piazza, M. Le Moal, and H. Simon Individual differences in the psychomotor effects of morphine are predicted by reactivity to novelty and influenced by corticosterone secretion. Brain Res 623 1993 341 344
7. S.M. Erb, and L.A. Parker Individual differences in novelty-induced activity do not predict strength of amphetamine-induced place conditioning Pharmacol Biochem Behav 48 1994 581 586
8. M. Exner, and D. Clark Behaviour in the novel environment predicts responsiveness to d-amphetamine in the rat: a multivariate approach Behav Pharmacol 4 1993 47 56
9. G.D. Frye, and G.R. Breese An evaluation of the locomotor stimulating action of ethanol in rats and mice Psychopharmacology 75 1981 372 379
10. S.A. Glantz, and B.K. Slinker Primer of applied regression and analysis of variance 2nd ed. 2001 McGraw Hill New York
11. W. Gong, D.B. Neill, and J.B. Justice Locomotor response to novelty does not predict cocaine place preference conditioning in rats Pharmacol Biochem Behavior 53 1996 191 196
12. A.M. Graybiel, R. Moratalla, and H.A. Robertson Amphetamine and cocaine induce drug-specific activation of the c-fos gene in striosome-matrix compartments and limbic subdivisions of the striatum Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 87 1990 6912 6916
13. S.E. Hemby, G.H. Jones, J.B. Justice Jr., and D.B. Neill Conditioned locomotor activity but not conditioned place preference following intra-accumbens infusions of cocaine Psychopharmacology 106 1992 330 336
14. M.S. Hooks, G.H. Jones, D.B. Neill, and J.B. Justice Jr. Individual differences in amphetamine sensitization: dose-dependent effects Pharmacol Biochem Behav 41 1991 203 210
15. M.S. Hooks, G.H. Jones, A.D. Smith, D.B. Neill, and J.B. Justice Jr. Individual differences in locomotor activity and sensitization Pharmacol Biochem Behav 38 1991 467 470
16. M.S. Hooks, G.H. Jones, A.D. Smith, D.B. Neill, and J.B. Justice Jr. Response to novelty predicts the locomotor and nucleus accumbens dopamine response to cocaine Synapse 9 1991 121 128
17. M.S. Hooks, A.C. Colvin, J.L. Juncos, and J.B. Justice Jr. Individual differences in basal and cocaine-stimulated extracellular dopamine in the nucleus accumbens using quantitative microdialysis Brain Res 587 1992 306 312
18. M.S. Hooks, G.H. Jones, B.J. Liem, and J.B. Justice Jr. Sensitization and individual differences to IP amphetamine, cocaine, or caffeine following repeated intra-cranial amphetamine infusions Pharmacol Biochem Behav 43 1992 815 823
19. M.S. Hooks, D.N. Jones, S.G. Holtzman, J.L. Juncos, P.W. Kalivas, and J.B. Justice Jr. Individual differences in behavior following amphetamine, GBR-12909, or apomorphine but not SKF-38393 or quinpirole Psychopharmacology 116 1994 217 225
20. D.N. Jones, and S.G. Holtzman Influence of naloxone upon motor activity induced by psychomotor stimulant drugs Psychopharmacology 114 1994 215 224
21. M. Kabbaj, C.S. Norton, S. Kollack-Walker, S.J. Watson, T.E. Robinson, and H. Akil Social defeat alters the acquisition of cocaine self-administration in rats: role of individual differences in cocaine-taking behavior Psychopharmacology 158 2001 382 387
22. A. Karim, and M.I. Arslan Isolation modifies the behavioural response in rats Bangladesh Med Res Counc Bull 26 2000 27 32
23. A.J. Keeney, and S. Hogg Behavioral consequences of repeated social defeat in the mouse: preliminary evaluation of a potential animal model of depression Behav Pharmacol 10 1999 753 764
24. J.E. Klebaur, R.A. Bevins, T.M. Segar, and M.T. Bardo Individual differences in behavioral responses to novelty and amphetamine self-administration in male and female rats Behav Pharmacol 12 2001 267 275
25. T.A. Kosten, and M.J. Miserendino Dissociation of novelty- and cocaine-condtioned locomotor activity from cocaine place conditioning Pharmacol Biochem Behav 60 1998 785 791
26. J.R. Mantsch, A. Ho, S.D. Schlussman, and M.J. Kreek Predictable individual differences in the initiation of cocaine self-administration by rats under extended-access conditions are dose-dependent Psychopharmacology 157 2001 31 39
27. M. Marinelli, and F.J. White Enhanced vulnerability to cocaine self-administration is associated with elevated impulse activity of midbrain dopamine neurons J Neurosci 20 2000 8876 8885
28. K.A. Miczek, H.E. Covington, E.M. Nikulina, and R.P. Hammer Aggression and defeat: persistent effects on cocaine self-administration and gene expression in peptidergic and aminergic mesocorticolimbic circuits Neurosci Biobehav Rev 27 2004 787 802
29. J.L. Myers, and A.D. Well Research design and statistical analysis 2nd ed. 2003 Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Mahwah, New Jersey & London
30. R. Nadal, A. Armario, and P.H. Janak Positive relationship between activity in a novel environment and operant ethanol self-administration in rats Psychopharmacology 162 2002 333 338
31. C. Nocjar, L.D. Middaugh, and M. Tavernetti Ethanol consumption and place-preference conditioning in the alcohol-preferring C57BL/6J mouse: relationship with motor activity patterns Alcohol Clin Exp Res 23 1999 198 203
32. Y. Pelloux, J. Costentin, and D. Duterte-Boucher Differential effects of novelty exposure on place preference conditioning to amphetamine and its oral consumption Psychopharmacology 171 2003 277 285
33. P.V. Piazza, J.M. Deminiere, M. Le Moal, and H. Simon Factors that predict individual vulnerability to amphetamine self-administration Science 245 1989 1511 1513
34. P.V. Piazza, J.M. Deminiere, M. Le Moal, and H. Simon Stress- and pharmacologically-induced behavioral sensitization increases vulnerability to acquisition of amphetamine self-administration. Brain Res 514 1990 22 26
35. P.J. Pierre, and P. Vezina Predisposition to self-administer amphetamine: the contribution of response to novelty and prior exposure to the drug Psychopharmacology 129 1997 277 284
36. E. Quertemont, C. Brabant, and E. Tirelli Response to novelty as a predictor for drug effects: the pitfalls of some correlational analyses Psychopharmacology 173 2004 221 224
37. F.O. Risinger, D.H. Malott, L.K. Prather, D.R. Niehus, and C.L. Cunningham Motivational properties of ethanol in mice selectively bred for ethanol-induced locomotor differences Psychopharmacology 116 1994 207 216
38. P.M. Robinet, J.K. Rowlett, and M.T. Bardo Individual differences in novelty-induced activity and the rewarding effects of novelty and amphetamine in rats Behav Proc 44 1998 1 9
39. T.W. Seale, and J.M. Carney Genetic determinants of susceptibility to the rewarding and other behavioral actions of cocaine J Addict Dis 10 1991 141 162
40. K. Shimosato, and S. Watanabe Concurrent evaluation of locomotor response to novelty and propensity toward cocaine conditioned place preference in mice J Neurosci Methods 128 2003 103 110
41. L.M. Silver Mouse genetics: concepts and applications 1995 Oxford University Press Oxford
42. N. Suto, J.D. Austin, and P. Vezina Locomotor response to novelty predicts a rat's propensity to self-administer nicotine Psychopharmacology 158 2001 175 180
43. N.R. Swerdlow, F.J. Vaccarino, and G.F. Koob Effects of naloxone on heroin-, amphetamine- and caffeine-stimulated locomotor activity in the rat Pharmacol Biochem Behav 23 1985 499 501
44. O.Y. Vekovischeva, S.G. Semenova, E.V. Verbitskaya, and E.E. Zvartau Effects of morphine and cocaine in mice with stable high aggressive and nonaggressive behavioral strategy Pharmacol Biochem Behav 77 2004 235 243
45. R.A. Wise, and M.A. Bozarth A psychomotor stimulant theory of addiction Psychol Rev 94 1987 469 492
46. Y. Zhang, J.R. Mantsch, S.D. Schlussman, A. Ho, and M.J. Kreek Conditioned place preference after single doses or "binge" cocaine in C57BL/6J and 129/J mice Pharmacol Biochem Behav 73 2002 655 662
47. X. Zheng, X. Ke, B. Tan, X. Luo, W. Xu, and X. Yang Susceptibility to morphine place conditioning: relationship with stress-induced locomotion and novelty-seeking behavior in juvenile and adult rats Pharmacol Biochem Behav 75 2003 929 935