Predisposition to self-administer amphetamine: The contribution of response to novelty and prior exposure to the drug

Psychopharmacology

Volumn 129, Issue 3, 1997, Pages 277-284

  Pierre, Peter J ^a   Vezina, Paul ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO   (United States)

Author keywords

Amphetamine; Locomotor activity; Pre exposure; Predisposition; Response to novelty; Self administration; Sensitization

Indexed keywords

ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ARTICLE; BEHAVIOR; CONTROLLED STUDY; DISEASE PREDISPOSITION; DRUG SELF ADMINISTRATION; ENVIRONMENTAL FACTOR; EXPERIENCE; INSTRUMENTAL CONDITIONING; INTRAPERITONEAL DRUG ADMINISTRATION; LOCOMOTION; MALE; NONHUMAN; PREDICTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RAT; SENSITIZATION;

AMPHETAMINE; ANIMALS; CENTRAL NERVOUS SYSTEM STIMULANTS; EXPLORATORY BEHAVIOR; INDIVIDUALITY; MALE; MOTOR ACTIVITY; RATS; RATS, SPRAGUE-DAWLEY; SELF ADMINISTRATION;

EID: 0031058181     PISSN: 00333158     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s002130050191     Document Type: Article

References (42)

1. Ahmed SH, Stinus L, Le Moal M, Cador M (1993) Controlling interindividual differences in the unconditioned response to amphetamine in the study of environment-dependent sensitization. Behav Pharmacol 4: 355-365
2. Ahmed SH, Stinus L, Le Moal M, Cador M (1995) Social deprivation enhances the vulnerability of male Wistar rats to stressor-and amphetamine-induced behavioral sensitization. Psychopharmacology 117: 116-124
3. Bozarth, MA (1991) The mesolimbic dopamine system as a model reward system. In: Willner P and Scheel-Krüger J (eds) The mesolimbic dopamine system: from motivation to action. Wiley, New York, pp 301-330
4. Bradberry CW, Gruen RJ, Berridge CW, Roth, RH (1991) Individual differences in behavioral measures: correlations with nucleus accumbens dopamine measured by microdialysis. Pharmacol Biochem Behav 39: 887-892
5. Crippens D, Camp DM, Robinson TE (1993) Basal extracellular dopamine in the nucleus accumbens during amphetamine withdrawal: a "no net flux" microdialysis study. Neurosci Lett 164: 145-148
6. Deminiere JM, Piazza PV, Le Moal M, Simon H (1989) Experimental approach to individual vulnerability to psychostimulant addiction. Neurosci Biobehav Rev 13: 141-147
7. Deminiere JM, Piazza PV, Guegan G, Abrous N, Maccari S, Le Moal M, Simon H (1992) Increased locomotor response to novelty and propensity to intravenous self-administration in adult offspring or stressed mothers. Brain Res 586: 135-139
8. Erb SM, Parker LA (1994) Individual differences in novelty-induced activity do not predict strength of amphetamine-induced place conditioning. Pharmacol Biochem Behav 48: 581-586
9. Exner M, Clark D (1993) Behaviour in the novel environment predicts responsiveness to d-amphetamine in the rat: a multivariate approach. Behav Pharmacol 4: 47-56
10. Gaiardi M, Bartoletti M, Bacchi A, Gubellini C, Costa M, Babbini M (1991) Role of repeated exposure to morphine in determining its affective properties: place and taste conditioning studies in rats. Psychopharmacology 103: 183-186
11. Gong W, Neill DB, Justice JB (1996) Locomotor response to novelty does not predict cocaine place preference conditioning in rats. Pharmacol Biochem Behav 53: 191-196
12. Haney M, Maccari S, Le Moal M, Simon H, Piazza PV (1995) Social stress increases the acquisition of cocaine self-administration in male and female rats. Brain Res 698: 46-52
13. Henry C, Guegant G, Cador M, Arnauld E, Arsaut J, Le Moal M, Demotes-Mainard J (1995) Prenatal stress in rats facilitates amphetamine-induced sensitization and induces long-lasting changes in dopamine receptors in the nucleus accumbens. Brain Res 685: 179-186
14. Hooks MS, Jones GH, Neill DB, Justice JB Jr (1991a) Individual differences in amphetamine sensitization: dose-dependent effects. Pharmacol Biochem Behav 41: 203-210
15. Hooks MS, Jones GH, Smith AD, Neill DB, Justice JB Jr (1991b) Individual differences in locomotor activity and sensitization. Pharmacol Biochem Behav 38: 467-470
16. Hooks MS, Jones GH, Smith AD, Neill DB, Justice JB Jr (1991c) Response to novelty predicts the locomotor and nucleus accumbens dopamine response to cocaine. Synapse 9: 121-128
17. Hooks MS, Colvin AC, Juncos JL, Justice JB Jr (1992a) Individual differences in basal and cocaine-stimulated extracellular dopamine in the nucleus accumbens using quantitative microdialysis. Brain Res 587: 306-312
18. Hooks MS, Jones GH, Liem BJ, Justice JB Jr (1992b) Sensitization and individual differences to IP amphetamine, cocaine, or caffeine following repeated intracranial amphetamine injections. Pharmacol Biochem Behav 43: 815-823
19. Hooks MS, Jones GH, Juncos JL, Neill DB, Justice JB Jr (1994) Individual differences in schedule-induced and conditioned behaviors. Behav Brain Res 60: 199-209
20. Horger BA, Shelton K, Schenk S (1990) Pre-exposure sensitizes rats to the rewarding effects of cocaine. Pharmacol Biochem Behav 37: 707-711
21. Horger BA, Giles MK, Schenk S (1992) Pre-exposure to amphetamine and nicotine predisposes rats to self-administer a low dose of cocaine. Psychopharmacology 107: 271-276
22. Jodogne C, Marinelli M, Le Moal M, Piazza PV (1994) Animals predisposed to develop amphetamine sell-administration show higher susceptibility to develop contextual conditioning of both amphetamine-induced hyperlocomotion and sensitization. Brain Res 657: 236-244
23. Kalivas PW, Stewart J (1991) Dopamine transmission in the initiation and expression of drug and stress-induced sensitization of motor activity. Brain Res Rev 16: 223-244
24. Kirk RE (1968) Experimental design: procedures for the behavioral sciences. Brooks/Cole, Pacific Grove, Calif.
25. Lett BT (1989) Repeated exposures intensify rather than diminish the rewarding effects of amphetamine, morphine, and cocaine. Psychopharmacology 98: 357-362
26. Paulson PE, Camp DM, Robinson TE (1991) Time course of transient behavioral depression and persistent behavioral sensitization in relation to regional brain monoamine concentrations during amphetamine withdrawal in rats. Psychopharmacology 103: 480-492
27. Paulson PE, Robinson TE (1995) Amphetamine-induced time-dependent sensitization of dopamine neurotransmission in the dorsal and ventral striatum: a microdialysis study in behaving rats. Synapse 19: 56-65
28. Piazza PV, Le Moal M (1996) Pathophysiological basis of vulnerability to drug abuse: role of an interaction between stress, glucocorticoids and dopaminergic neurons. Annu Rev Toxicol 36: 359-378
29. Piazza PV, Deminiere JM, Le Moal M, Simon H (1989) Factors that predict individual vulnerability to amphetamine self-administration. Science 245: 1511-1513
30. Piazza PV, Deminiere JM, Le Moal M, Simon H (1990) Stress-and pharmacologically-induced behavioral sensitization increases vulnerability to acquisition of amphetamine self-administration. Brain Res 514: 22-26
31. Piazza PV, Deminiere JM, Maccari S, Le Moal M, Mormede P, Simon H (1991a) Individual vulnerability to drug self-administration: action of corticosterone on dopaminergic systems as a possible pathophysiological mechanism. In: Willner P, Scheel-Krüger J (eds) The mesolimbic dopamine system: from motivation to action. Wiley, New York, pp 473-495
32. Piazza PV, Rouge-Pont F, Deminiere JM, Kharouby M, Le Moal M, Simon H (1991b) Dopaminergic activity is reduced in the prefrontal cortex and increased in the nucleus accumbens of rats predisposed to develop amphetamine self-administration. Brain Res 567: 169-174
33. Piazza PV, Mittleman G, Deminiere JM, Le Moal M, Simon H (1993) Relationship between schedule-induced polydipsia and amphetamine intravenous self-administration, individual differences and role of experience. Behav Brain Res 55: 185-193
34. Roberts DCS, Richardson NR (1992) Self-administration of psychomotor stimulants using progressive ratio schedules ot reinforcement. In: Bolton A, Baker G, We PH (eds) Neuromethods, vol 24: animal models of drug addition. Humana Press, Totowa NJ, pp 233-269
35. Robinson TE (1988) Stimulant drugs and stress: factors influencing individual differences in the susceptibility to sensitization. In: Kalivas PW, Barnes CD (eds) Sensitization in the nervous system. Telford Press, Caldwell, NJ, pp 145-173
36. Robinson TE, Berridge KC (1993) The neural basis of drug craving: an incentive-sensitization theory of addiction. Brain Res Rev 18: 247-291
37. Rouge-Pont F, Piazza PV, Kharouby M, Le Moal M, Simon H (1993) Higher and longer stress-induced increase in dopamine concentrations in the nucleus accumbens of animals predisposed to amphetamine self-administration. A microdialysis study. Brain Res 602: 169-174
38. Schenk S, Lacelle G, Gorman K, Amit Z (1987) Cocaine self-administration in rats influenced by environmental conditions: implications for the etiology of drug abuse. Neurosci Lett 81: 227-231
39. Shippenberg TS, Heidbreder Ch (1995) Sensitization to the conditioned rewarding effects of cocaine: pharmacological and temporal characteristics. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 273: 808-815
40. Shoaib M, Spanagel R, Stohr T, Shippenberg TS (1995) Strain differences in the rewarding and dopamine-releasing effects of morphine in rats. Psychopharmacology 117: 240-247
41. Valadez A, Schenk S (1994) Persistence of the ability of amphetamine pro-exposure to facilitate acquisition of cocaine self-administration. Pharmacol Biochem Behav 47: 203-205
42. Wool verton WL, Cervo L, Johanson CE (1984) Effects of repeated methamphetamine administration on methamphetamine self-administration in rhesus monkeys. Pharmacol Biochem Behav 21: 737-741