Use of the event-related P300 potential in cochlear implant subjects for the study of strategy-dependent speech processing

International Journal of Audiology

Volumn 43, Issue SUPPL. 1, 2004, Pages

  Beynon, A J ^a,b   Snik, A F M ^a  

^a RADBOUD UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER   (Netherlands)

^b RADBOUD UNIVERSITY NIJMEGEN   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Auditory late cortical potentials; Cochlear implant; Event related potentials; P300; Speech processing; Speech coding strategies

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CLINICAL ARTICLE; COCHLEA PROSTHESIS; CODING; EVENT RELATED POTENTIAL; EVOKED AUDITORY RESPONSE; HUMAN; MISMATCH NEGATIVITY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SPEECH; SPEECH DISCRIMINATION; SPEECH PERCEPTION;

BRAIN STEM; COCHLEAR IMPLANTS; EQUIPMENT DESIGN; EVENT-RELATED POTENTIALS, P300; EVOKED POTENTIALS, AUDITORY; HUMANS; REACTION TIME; SPEECH RECEPTION THRESHOLD TEST; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 13144266698     PISSN: 14992027     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (17)

1. Beynon, A.J., Snik, A.F.M. & Van den Broek, P. 2002. Evaluation of cochlear implant benefit with auditory cortical evoked potentials. Int J Audiol, 41, 429-435.
2. Beynon, A.J., Snik, A.F.M. & Van den Broek, P. 2003. Comparison of different speech coding strategies using a disability-based inventory and speech perception tests in quiet and in noise. Otol Neurotol, 24(3), 392-396.
3. Beynon, A.J., Snik, A.F.M., Stegeman, D.F. & Van den Broek, P. Discrimination of speech sound contrasts determined with behavioural tests and event-related potentials in cochlear implant recipients. J Am Acad Audiol (in press).
4. Coles, M.G.H., Smid, H.G.O.M., Scheffers, M.K. & Otten, L.J. 1997. Mental chronometry and the study of human information processing. In: Rugg & Coles (ed.) Electrophysiology of the Mind: Event-related Brain Potentials and Cognition. New York: Oxford University Press, pp. 86-131.
5. Donchin, E. & Coles, M.G.H. 1988. On the conceptual foundations of cognitive psychophysiology. Behav Brain Sci, 11, 406-417.
6. Groenen, P.A.P., Beynon, A.J., Snik, A.F.M. & Van den Broek, P. 2001. Speech-evoked cortical potentials and speech recognition in cochlear implant users. Scand Audiol, 20, 31-40.
7. Jordan, K., Schmidt, A., Plotz, K., Von Specht, H., Begall, K., et al. 1997. Auditory event-related potentials in post- and prelingually deaf cochlear implant recipients. Am J Otol, 18(suppl), 116-117.
8. Kiefer, J., Hohl, S., Stürzebecher, E., Pfennigdorff, T. & Gstoettner, W. 2001. Comparison of speech recognition with different speech coding strategies (SPEAK, CIS, ACE) and their relationship to telemetric measures of compound action potentials in the Nucleus CI 24M cochlear implant system. Audiology, 40, 32-42.
9. Kileny, P.R., Boerst, A. & Zwolan, T.A. 1997. Cognitive evoked potentials to speech and tonal stimuli in children with implants. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg, 117(3), 161-169.
10. Kutas, M., McCarthy, G. & Donchin, E. 1997. Augmenting mental chronometry: the P300 as a measure of stimulus evaluation time. Science, 197, 792-795.
11. Lai, W.K., Bögli, H. & Dillier, N. 2003. A software tool for analyzing multichannel cochlear implant signals. Ear Hear, 24, 380-391.
12. Micco, A.G., Kraus, N., Koch, D.B., McGee, T.J., Carrell, T.D., et al. 1995. Speech-evoked cognitive P300 potentials in cochlear implant recipients. Am J Otol, 16, 514-520.
13. Oviatt, D.L. & Kileny, P.R. 1991. Auditory event-related potentials elicited from cochlear implant recipients and hearing subjects. Am J Audiol, 1, 48-55.
14. Parkinson, A.J., Parkinson, W.S., Tyler, R.S., Lowder, M.W. & Gantz, B.J. 1998. Speech performance in experienced cochlear implant subjects receiving the SPEAK processing strategy in the Nucleus Spectra 22 cochlear implant. J Speech Lang Hear Res, 41, 1073-1087.
15. Polich, J. 1998. P300 clinical utility and control of variability. J Clin Neurophysiol, 15(1), 14-33.
16. Sharma, A., Kraus, N., McGee, T., Carell, T. & Nicol, T. 1993. Acoustic versus phonetic representation of speech as reflected by the mismatch negativity event-related potential. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol, 88, 64-71.
17. Thornton, A.R. & Raffin, M.J.M. 1978. Speech discrimination scores modelled as a binomial variable. J Speech Hear Res, 21, 507-518.