Evaluation of cochlear implant benefit with auditory cortical evoked potentials

International Journal of Audiology

Volumn 41, Issue 7, 2002, Pages 429-435

  Beynon, Andy J ^a   Snik, Ad F M ^a   Van Den Broek, Paul ^a  

^a RADBOUD UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Auditory evoked potentials; Cochlear implantation; NI; P2; P300; Phonetic processing; Speech stimuli

Indexed keywords

ACOUSTICS; ARTICLE; CHILD; CLINICAL ARTICLE; COCHLEA PROSTHESIS; CONGENITAL DEAFNESS; CONTROLLED STUDY; EVOKED AUDITORY RESPONSE; HUMAN; PHONETICS; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PURE TONE AUDIOMETRY; SIGNAL PROCESSING; SPEECH DISCRIMINATION; ADOLESCENT; CASE CONTROL STUDY; EVALUATION; EVENT RELATED POTENTIAL; HEARING; HEARING IMPAIRMENT; PHYSIOLOGY; SPEECH INTELLIGIBILITY; SPEECH PERCEPTION;

ADOLESCENT; AUDIOMETRY, PURE-TONE; CASE-CONTROL STUDIES; CHILD; COCHLEAR IMPLANTS; DEAFNESS; EVENT-RELATED POTENTIALS, P300; EVOKED POTENTIALS, AUDITORY; HEARING; HUMANS; PHONETICS; SPEECH INTELLIGIBILITY; SPEECH PERCEPTION;

EID: 0036781914     PISSN: 14992027     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3109/14992020209090420     Document Type: Article

References (16)

1. Beynon G, Munro K (1993). A discussion of current sound field calibration procedures. Br J Audiol 27:427-435.
2. Dalebout SD, Fox LG (2001). Reliability of the mismatch negativity in responses of individual listeners. J Am Acad Audiol 12:245-253.
3. Donchin E, Coles MGH (1988). On the conceptual foundations of cognitive psychophysiology. Behav Brain Sci 11:406-417.
4. Groenen PAP, Makhdoum M, Van den Brink J, Stollman M, Snik AFM, Van den Broek P (1996). The relation between electric auditory brain stem and cognitive responses and speech perception in cochlear implant users. Acta Otolaryngol (Stockh) 116:785-790.
5. Groenen PAP, Beynon AJ, Snik AFM, Van den Broek P (2001). Speech-evoked cortical potentials and speech recognition in cochlear implant users. Scand Audiol 30:31-40.
6. Kileny PR (1991). Use of electrophysiologic measures in the management of children with cochlear implants: brainstem, middle latency and cognitive (P300) responses. Am J Otol 12:37-42.
7. Kraus N, McGee T (1994). Mismatch negativity in the assessment of central auditory function. Short course. Am J Audiol 3:339-51.
8. Kraus N, Micco AG, Koch DB, et al (1993). The mismatch negativity cortical evoked potential elicited by speech in cochlear implant users. Hear Res 65:118-124.
9. Micco AG, Kraus N, Koch DB, et al (1995). Speech-evoked cognitive P300 potentials in cochlear implant recipients. Am J Otol 4:514-520.
10. Oviatt DL, Kileny PR (1991). Auditory event-related potentials elicited from cochlear implant recipients and hearing subjects. Am J Audiol 1:48-55.
11. Ponton CW, Eggermont JJ, Don M, et al (2000). Maturation of the mismatch negativity: effects of profound deafness and cochlear implant use. Audiol Neurootol 5:167-185.
12. Ruchkin DS, Johnson R, Canoune HL, Ritter W, Hammer M (1990). Multiple sources of P3b associated with different types of information. Psychophysiology 27(2):157-176.
13. Sharma A, Kraus N, McGee T, Carell T, Nicol T (1993). Acoustic versus phonetic representation of speech as reflected by the mismatch negativity event-related potential. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 88:64-71.
14. Snik AFM, Makhdoum MJA, Vermeulen AV, Brokx JPL, Van den Broek P (1997a). The relation between age at the time of cochlear implantation and long-term speech perception abilities in congenitally deaf subjects. Int J Ped Otorhinolaryngol 41:121-131.
15. Snik AFM, Vermeulen AM, Brokx JPL, Beijk C, Van den Broek P (1997b). Speech performance of children with a cochlear implant compared to that of children with conventional hearing aids. The 'equivalent hearing loss' concept. Acta Otolaryngol (Stockh) 117:750-754.
16. Wable J, van den Abbeele T, Gallego S, Frachet B (2000). Mismatch negativity of stimuli discrimination in cochlear implant subjects. Clin Neurophysiol 111:743-751.