Comparison of different speech coding strategies using a disability-based inventory and speech perception tests in quiet and in noise

Otology and Neurotology

Volumn 24, Issue 3, 2003, Pages 392-396

  Beynon, Andy J ^a   Snik, Ad F M ^a   Van den Broek, Paul ^a  

^a RADBOUD UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

APHAB; Cochlear implants; Speech coding strategies; Speech perception

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CLINICAL ARTICLE; COCHLEA PROSTHESIS; CROSSOVER PROCEDURE; DISABILITY; FEMALE; HEARING IMPAIRMENT; HEARING TEST; HUMAN; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; MALE; NOISE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUESTIONNAIRE; SPEECH; SPEECH DISCRIMINATION; SPEECH PERCEPTION; TECHNIQUE;

ADULT; AGED; COCHLEAR IMPLANTATION; CROSS-OVER STUDIES; DEAFNESS; DISABILITY EVALUATION; ELECTRIC STIMULATION; EQUIPMENT DESIGN; FEMALE; HEARING AIDS; HUMANS; MALE; MENIERE'S DISEASE; MENINGITIS; MIDDLE AGED; NOISE; OTOSCLEROSIS; QUESTIONNAIRES; SEVERITY OF ILLNESS INDEX; SPEECH DISCRIMINATION TESTS; SPEECH PERCEPTION;

EID: 0037799360     PISSN: 15317129     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/00129492-200305000-00008     Document Type: Article

References (7)

1. Arndt P, Staller S, Arcaroli J, et al. Within-subject comparison of advanced coding strategies in the Nucleus 24 cochlear implant. Report of the Cochlear Corporation, April 1-7, 1999.
2. Parkinson AJ, Parkinson WS, Tyler RS, et al. Speech performance in experienced cochlear implant subjects receiving the SPEAK processing strategy in the Nucleus Spectra 22 cochlear implant. J Speech Lang Hear Res 1999;41:1073-87.
3. Kiefer J, Hohl S, Stürzebecher E, et al. Comparison of speech recognition with different speech coding strategies (SPEAK, CIS, ACE) and their relationship to telemetric measures of compound action potentials in the Nucleus CI 24M cochlear implant system. Audiology 2001;40:32-42.
4. Bosman AJ. Speech perception by the hearing impaired. Utrecht, University of Utrecht, 1989 (dissertation).
5. Cox RM, Alexander GC. The abbreviated profile of hearing aid benefit. Ear Hear 1999;16:176-86.
6. Thornton AR, Raffin MJM. Speech discrimination scores modeled as a binomial variable. J Speech Hear Res 1978;21:507-18.
7. Arlinger S, Lyregaard P, Billermark E, et al. Fitting hearing aids to first time users. Scand Audiol 2000;29:150-58.