Discrimination of speech sound contrasts determined with behavioral tests and event-related potentials in cochlear implant recipients

Journal of the American Academy of Audiology

Volumn 16, Issue 1, 2005, Pages 42-53

  Beynon, A J ^a   Snik, A F M ^a   Stegeman, D F ^a   Van Den Broek, P ^a  

^a RADBOUD UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Cochlear implantation; Cortical responses; Discrimination; Electrophysiological measurements; Event related potentials; Objective measurements; P300; Speech coding strategies

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; BEHAVIOR; CLINICAL ARTICLE; COCHLEA PROSTHESIS; CONTROLLED STUDY; EVENT RELATED POTENTIAL; FEMALE; HUMAN; LATENT PERIOD; MALE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SCORING SYSTEM; SOUND; SPEECH; AUDITORY STIMULATION; EVALUATION; EVOKED AUDITORY RESPONSE; HEARING LOSS; METHODOLOGY; MIDDLE AGED; PHYSIOLOGY; SPEECH PERCEPTION; STATISTICS;

ACOUSTIC STIMULATION; ADULT; AGED; COCHLEAR IMPLANTS; EVOKED POTENTIALS, AUDITORY; FEMALE; HEARING LOSS; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; SPEECH PERCEPTION; STATISTICS;

EID: 23944438987     PISSN: 10500545     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3766/jaaa.16.1.5     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. Abbas PJ, Brown CJ, Shallop JK, Firszt JB, Hughes ML, Hong SH, Staller SJ. (1999) Summary of results using the Nucleus CI24M Implant to record the electrically evoked compound action potential. Ear Hear 20:45-59.
2. Beynon AJ, Snik AFM, Van den Broek P. (2003) Comparison of different speech coding strategies using a disability-based inventory and speech perception tests in quiet and in noise. Otol Neurotol 24:392-396.
3. Coles MGH, Smid HGOM, Scheffers MK, Otten LJ. (1997) Mental chronometry and the study of human information processing. In: Rugg MD, Coles MGH, eds. Electrophysiology of the Mind: Event-Related Brain Potentials and Cognition. New York: Oxford University Press, 86-131.
4. Dalebout SD, Fox LG. (2001) Reliability of the mismatch negativity in the responses of individual listeners. J Am Acad Audiol 12:245-253.
5. Donchin E, Coles MGH. (1988) On the conceptual foundations of cognitive psychophysiology. Behav Brain Sci 1:406-417.
6. Gratton G, Bosco CM, Kramer AF, Coles MGH, Wickens CD, Donchin E. (1990) Event-related brain potentials as indices of information extraction and response priming. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 75:419-432.
7. Groenen PAP, Beynon AJ, Snik AFM, Van den Broek P. (2001) Speech-evoked cortical potentials and speech recognition in cochlear implant users. Scand Audiol 20:31-40.
8. Groenen PAP, Snik AFM, Van den Broek P. (1996) On the clinical relevance of the mismatch negativity: results from subjects with normal hearing and cochlear implant users. Audiol Neurotol 1:112-124.
9. Groenen PAP, Snik AFM, Van den Broek P. (1997) Electrically evoked auditory middle latency responses versus speech perception abilities in cochlear implant users. Audiology 36:83-97.
10. Kiefer J, Hohl S, Stürzebecher E, Pfennigdorff T, Gstoettner W. (2001) Comparison of speech recognition with different speech coding strategies (SPEAK, CIS, ACE) and their relationship to telemetric measures of compound action potentials in the Nucleus CI 24M cochlear implant system. Audiology 40:32-42.
11. Kileny PR. (1991) Use of electrophysiologic measures in the management of children with cochlear implants: brainstem, middle latency and cognitive (P300) responses. Am J Otol 12:37-42.
12. Kileny PR, Boerst A, Zwolan T (1997) Cognitive evoked potentials to speech and tonal stimuli in children with implants. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 9:162-169.
13. Kileny PR, Zwolan TA, Zimmerman-Phillips S, Telian SA. (1994) Electrically evoked auditory brainstem response in paediatric patients with cochlear implants. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 120:1083-1090.
14. Kraus N, Micco A, Koch DB, McGee TJ, Carrell TD, Wiet R, Weingarten C, Sharma A. (1993) The mismatch negativity cortical evoked potential elicited by speech in cochlear implant users. Hear Res 65:118-124.
15. Kutas M, McCarthy G, Donchin E. (1977) Augmenting mental chronometry: the P300 as a measure of stimulus evaluation time. Science 197:792-795.
16. Makhdoum MJA, Groenen PAP, Snik AFM, Van den Broek P. (1998) Intra- and interindividual correlations between auditory evoked potentials and speech perception in cochlear implant users. Scand Audiol 27:13-20.
17. Micco AG, Kraus N, Koch DB, McGee TJ, Carrell TD, Sharma A, Nicol T, Wiet R. (1995) Speech-evoked cognitive P300 potentials in cochlear implant recipients. Am J Otol 16:514-520.
18. Näätänen R. (1995) The mismatch negativity: a powerful tool for cognitive neuroscience. Ear Hear 1:6-18.
19. Nuwer MR, Comi C, Emerson R, et al. (1998) IFCN standards for digital recording of clinical EEG. Electroencephogr Clin Neurophysiol 106:259-261.
20. Parkinson AJ, Parkinson WS, Tyler RS, Lowder MW, Gantz BJ. (1998) Speech performance in experienced cochlear implant subjects receiving the SPEAK processing strategy in the Nucleus Spectra 22 cochlear implant. J Speech Lang Hear Res 41:1073-1087.
21. Vandali AE, Whitford LA, Plant KL, Clark GM. (2000) Speech perception as a function of electrical stimulation rate: using the Nucleus 24 cochlear implant system. Ear Hear 21:608-624.