Probing glaucoma visual damage by rarebit perimetry

British Journal of Ophthalmology

Volumn 89, Issue 2, 2005, Pages 180-184

  Brusini, P ^a   Salvetat, M L ^a   Parisi, L ^a   Zeppieri, M ^a  

^a SANTA MARIA DELLA MISERICORDIA UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (Italy)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ACHROMATIC PERIMETRY; ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; AUTOANALYZER; CHI SQUARE TEST; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; CORRELATION ANALYSIS; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; EARLY DIAGNOSIS; FEMALE; GLAUCOMA; HUMAN; HUMPHREY FIELD ANALYZER; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; INTRAOCULAR HYPERTENSION; MALE; OPEN ANGLE GLAUCOMA; PERIMETRY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RAREBIT PERIMETRY; STATISTICAL ANALYSIS; STUDENT NEWMAN KEULS TEST; VISUAL DISORDER; VISUAL FIELD;

ADULT; AGED; ALGORITHMS; FEMALE; GLAUCOMA, OPEN-ANGLE; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; OCULAR HYPERTENSION; PERIMETRY; REGRESSION ANALYSIS; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; VISION DISORDERS; VISUAL FIELDS;

EID: 12944299250     PISSN: 00071161     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1136/bjo.2003.041178     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Ekstroem C. Prevalence of open-angle glaucoma in central Sweden. The Tierp Glaucoma Survey. Acta Ophthalmol Scand 1996;74:107-12.
2. Harwreth RS, Crauford ML, Frishman LJ, et al. Visual field defects and neural losses from experimental glaucoma. Prog Ret Eye Res 2002;21:91-125.
3. Quigley HA. Neuronal death in glaucoma. Prog Ret Eye Res 1999;18:39-57.
4. Quigley HA, Dunkelberger GR, Green WR. Retinal ganglion cell atrophy correlated with automated perimetry in human eyes with glaucoma. Am J Ophthalmol 1989;107:453-64.
5. Kerringan-Baumrind LA, Quigley HA, Pease ME, et al. Number of ganglion cells in glaucoma eyes compared with threshold visual field tests in the same persons. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2000;41:741-8.
6. Curcio CA, Owsley C, Skalka HW, et al. Topography of retinal cells and visual sensitivity in the same human eye. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 1993;34:777.
7. Pederson JE, Anderson DR. The mode of progressive disc cupping in ocular hypertension and glaucoma. Arch Ophthalmol 1980;58:14-19.
8. Cello KE, Nelson-Quigg JM, Johnson CA. Frequency doubling technology perimetry for detection of glaucomatous visual field loss. Am J Ophthalmol 2000;129:314-22.
9. Bosworth CF, Sample PA, Gupta N, et al. Motion automated perimetry identifies early glaucomatous field defects. Arch Ophthalmol 1998;116:1153-8.
10. Yoshiyama KK, Johnson CA. Which method of flicker perimetry is most effective for detection of glaucomatous visual field loss? Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 1997;38:2270-7.
11. Frisén L. High-pass resolution perimetry: evidence from parvocellular neural channel dependence. Neuro-ophthalmology 1992;12:257-64.
12. Chauhan BC, House PH, McCormick TA, et al. Comparison of conventional and high-pass resolution perimetry in a prospective study of patients with glaucoma and healthy controls. Arch Ophthalmol 1999;117:24-33.
13. Bayer AU, Maag KP, Erb C. Detection of optic neuropathy in glaucomatous eyes with normal standard visual fields using a test battery of short-wavelength automated perimetry and pattern electroretinography. Ophthalmology 2002;109:1350-61.
14. Frisén L. New, sensitive window on abnormal spatial vision: rarebit probing. Vis Res 2002;42:1931-9.
15. Frisén L. Spatial vision in visually asymptomatic subjects at high risk for multiple sclerosis. J Neurol Neurasurg Psychiatry 2003;74:1145-47.
16. Heijl A. Humphrey field analyzer. In: Drance SM, Anderson DR, eds. Automated perimetry in glaucoma, a practical guide. Orlando: Grune and Stratton, 1985:129-40.
17. Andersen D, Patella V. Automated static perimetry. St. Louis: Mosby, 1999:117.
18. Brusini P. Clinical use of a new method for visual field classification in glaucoma. Eur J Ophthalmol 1996;6:402-7.
19. European Glaucoma Society. 2003 Terminology and guidelines for glaucoma. Savona, Italy: Dogma, 2003;ch 2, 5-8.
20. Reus NJ, Colen TP, Lemij HG, et al. Visualization of localized retinal nerve fiber layer defects with the GDx with individualized and with fixed compensation of the anterior segment birefringence. Ophthalmology 2003;110:1512-16.
21. Frisen L. High-pass resolution perimetry: central-field neuroretinal correlates. Vis Res 1995;35:293-301.
22. Hanley A, McNeil BJ, A method of comparing the areas under the receiver operating characteristics curves derived from the same cases. Radiology 1983;148:839-43.
23. Curcio CA, Allen KA. Topography of ganglion cells in human retina. J Comp Neurol 1990;300:5-25.
24. Frisen I. High-pass resolution perimetry and age-related loss of visual pathway neurons. Acta Ophthalmol 1991;69:511-15.
25. Schiefer U, Benda N, Dietrich TJ, et al. Angioscotomata detection with fundus-oriented perimetry. A study with dark and bright stimuli of different sizes. Vis Res 1997;39:1897-909.
26. Johnson C, Samuels S. Screening for glaucomatous visual field loss with frequency-doubling perimetry. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 1997;38:413-25.
27. Graham SL, Drance SM. Interpretation of high-pass resolution perimetry with a probability plot. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 1995;233:140-9.
28. Sample PA, Bosworth CF, Blumenthal EZ, et al. Visual function-specific perimetry for indirect comparison of different ganglion cell populations in glaucoma. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2000;41:1783-90.