Which method of flicker perimetry is most effective for detection of glaucomatous visual field loss?

Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science

Volumn 38, Issue 11, 1997, Pages 2270-2277

  Yoshiyama, Kerri K ^a   Johnson, Chris A ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

Critical flicker fusion; Flicker perimetry; Glaucoma; Visual fields

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CONTRAST SENSITIVITY; DIAGNOSTIC TEST; GLAUCOMA; HUMAN; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; PERIMETRY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RELIABILITY; VISUAL FIELD DEFECT;

AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; CONTRAST SENSITIVITY; FLICKER FUSION; GLAUCOMA, OPEN-ANGLE; HUMANS; MIDDLE AGED; PERIMETRY; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; VISION DISORDERS; VISUAL ACUITY; VISUAL FIELDS;

EID: 0030821368     PISSN: 01460404     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (43)

1. Johnson CA, Adams AJ, Casson EJ, Brandt DM. Blue-on-yellow perimetry can predict the development of glaucomatous visual field loss. Arch Ophthalmol. 1991;111:645-650.
2. Johnson CA, Adams AJ, Casson EJ, Brandt JD. Progression of early glaucomatous visual field loss as detected by blue-on-yellow and standard white-on-white automated perimetry. Arch Ophthalmol. 1993;111:651-656.
3. Casson EJ, Johnson CA, Shapiro LR. Longitudinal comparison of temporal-modulation perimetry with white-on-white and blue-on-yellow perimetry in ocular hypertension and early glaucoma. J Opt Soc Am A. 1993;10:1792-1806.
4. Sample PA, Weinreb RN. Progressive color visual field loss in glaucoma. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1992; 33:2068-2071.
5. Sample PA, Weinreb RN. Color perimetry for assessment of primary open-angle glaucoma. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1990;31:1869-1875.
6. Sample PA, Taylor JDN, Martinez G, et al. Short-wavelength color visual fields in glaucoma suspects at risk. Am J Ophthalmol. 1993;115:225-233.
7. Sample PA, Martinez GA, Weinreb RN. Short-wavelength automated perimetry without lens density testing. Am J Ophthalmol. 1994;118:632-641.
8. Johnson CA, Brandt JD, Khong AM, Adams AJ. Short-wavelength automated perimetry in low-, medium-and high-risk ocular hypertensive eyes. Arch Ophthalmol. 1995;113:70-76.
9. Silverman SE, Trick GL, Hart WM. Motion perception is abnormal in primary open-angle glaucoma and ocular hypertension. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1990; 31:722-729.
10. Bullimore MA, Wood JM, Swenson K. Motion perception in glaucoma. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1993; 34:3526-3533.
11. Fitzke FW, Poinoosawmy D, Ernst W, Hitchings RA. Peripheral displacement thresholds in normals, ocular hypertensive and glaucoma. Doc Ophthalmol Proc Ser. 1987;49:447-452.
12. Johnson CA, Marshall D, Eng K. Displacement threshold perimetry in glaucoma using a Macintosh computer system and a 21-inch monitor. In: Mills RP, Wall M, eds. Perimetry Update 1993-94. Amsterdam: Kugler Publications; 1995:103-110.
13. Wall M, Jennisch CS, Munden PM. Motion perimetry identifies nerve fiber bundlelike defects in ocular hypertension. Arch Ophthalmol. 1997;115:26-33.
14. Sample PA, Ahn DS, Lee PC, Weinreb RN. High-pass resolution perimetry in eyes with ocular hypertension and primary open-angle glaucoma. Am J Ophthalmol. 1992;113:309-316.
15. Frisen L. High-pass resolution perimetry. Recent developments. In: Heijl A, ed. Perimetry Update 1988-89. Amsterdam: Kugler and Ghedini; 1989:369-376.
16. House PH, Cooper RL, Bulsara M. Comparing long-term variability using the Humphrey Field Analyzer and the Ring Perimeter in glaucoma subjects and normal subjects. In: Mills RP, ed. Perimetry Update 1992-93. Amsterdam: Kugler; 1993:63-72.
17. Lachenmayr BJ, Drance SM, Douglas GR, Mikelberg FS. Light-sense, flicker and resolution perimetry in glaucoma: A comparative study. Graefe's Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 1991;229:246-251.
18. Drum B, Severns M, O'Leary D, et al. Selective loss of pattern discrimination in early glaucoma. Appl Opt. 1989;28:1135-1144.
19. Maddess T, Henry GH. Performance of nonlinear visual units in ocular hypertension and glaucoma. Clin Vis Sci. 1992;7:371-383.
20. Johnson CA, Samuels SJ. Screening for glaucomatous visual field loss with frequency doubling perimetry. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1997;38:413-425.
21. Tyler CW. Specific deficits of flicker sensitivity in glaucoma and ocular hypertension. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1981;100:135-146.
22. Tytla, ME, Trope GE, Buncic JR. Flicker sensitivity in treated ocular hypertension. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1990;97:36-43.
23. Lachenmayr BJ, Tothbacher H, Gleissner M. Automated flicker perimetry versus quantitative static perimetry in early glaucoma. In: Heijl A, ed. Perimetry Update 1988-89. Proceedings of the Eighth International Perimetric Society Meeting, Vancouver, 1988. Amsterdam: Kugler & Ghedini; 1989:359-386.
24. Lachenmayr BJ, Drance SM, Chauhan BC, House PH, Lalani S. Diffuse and localized glaucomatous field loss in light-sense, flicker and resolution perimetry. Graefe's Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 1991;229:267-273.
25. Breton ME, Wilson TW, Wilson R, Spaeth G, Krupin T. Temporal contrast sensitivity loss in primary open angle glaucoma and glaucoma suspects. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1991;32:2931-2941.
26. Casson EJ, Johnson CA. Temporal modulation perimetry in glaucoma and ocular hypertension. In: Mills RP, ed. Perimetry Update 1992-93. Proceedings of the Xth International Perimetry Society Meeting, Kyoto, Japan. Amsterdam: Kugler Publications; 1993.
27. Eisner A, Samples JR. Profound reductions in flicker sensitivity in the elderly: Can glaucoma involve the retina distal to ganglion cells? Appl Opt. 1991;30:2121-2135.
28. Austin MW, O'Brien CJ, Wishart PK. Flicker perimetry using a luminance threshold strategy at frequencies from 5-25 Hz in glaucoma, ocular hypertension, and normal controls. Curr Eye Res. 1994;13:717-723.
29. Lachenmayr BJ, Gleissner M. Flicker perimetry resists retinal image degradation. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1992;33:3539-3542.
30. Casson EJ, Johnson CA, Nelson-Quigg JM. Temporal modulation perimetry: The effects of aging and eccentricity on sensitivity in normals. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1993;34:3096-3101.
31. Johnson CA, Shapiro L. A comparison of MOBS (Modified Binary Search) and staircase test procedures in automated perimetry. Noninvasive Assessment of the Visual System, 1989 Technical Digest Series 1989;7:84-87.
32. Tyrell RA, Owens DA. A rapid technique to assess the resting state of eyes and other threshold phenomena: The Modified Binary Search (MOBS). Beh Res Meth Instr Comp. 1988;20:137-141.
33. McNeil BJ, Adelstein SJ: Determining the value of diagnostic and screening tests. J Nucl Med. 1976;17:439-448.
34. Massof RW, Emmel TC. Criterion-free parameter-free distribution-independent index of diagnostic test performance. Appl Opt. 1987;26:1395-1408.
35. Schuchard RA, Massof RW. Decision making with clinical diagnostic tests in terms of statistical decision theory and information theory. Appl Opt. 1990;29:1436-1444.
36. Peterzell DH, Dougherty RF, Mayer MJ. Temporal tuning functions derived from individuals differences in De Lange functions. Vision Science and Its Applications (Optical Society of America Technical Digest), 1997;1:218-221.
37. Hess RF, Plant GT. Temporal frequency discrimination in human vision: Evidence for an additional mechanism in the low spatial and high temporal frequency region. Vis Res. 1985;25:1493-1500.
38. Hess RF, Snowden RJ. Temporal properties of human visual filters. Number shapes and spatial covariation. Vis Res. 1992;32:47-59.
39. Johnson CA. Selective versus nonselective losses in glaucoma. J Glauc. 1994(supplement); 3:S32-S44.
40. Johnson CA. The Glenn Fry Lecture: Early losses of visual function in glaucoma. Optom Vis Sci. 1995;72:359-370.
41. Rabin J, Wicks J. Measuring resolution in the contrast domain: The small letter contrast test. Optom Vis Sci. 1996;73:398-403.
42. Rabin J. Luminance effects on visual acuity and small letter contrast sensitivity. Optom Vis Sci. 1994;71:685-688.
43. Rabin J. Optical defocus: Differential effects on size and contrast letter recognition thresholds. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1994;35:646-648.