Angioscotoma detection with fundus-oriented perimetry. A study with dark and bright stimuli of different sizes

Vision Research

Volumn 39, Issue 10, 1999, Pages 1897-1909

  Schiefer, U ^a   Benda, N ^a   Dietrich, T J ^a   Selig, B ^a   Hofmann, C ^b   Schiller, J ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL TÜBINGEN   (Germany)

^b UNIVERSITY OF TÜBINGEN   (Germany)

Author keywords

Angioscotoma; Dark stimulus; Fundus oriented perimetry; Signal to noise ratio; Stimulus size

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; PERIMETRY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RETINA BLOOD VESSEL; SCOTOMA; SIGNAL NOISE RATIO; VISUAL FIELD; VISUAL STIMULATION;

ADULT; FEMALE; FUNDUS OCULI; HUMANS; LIGHT; MALE; MATHEMATICS; PERIMETRY; PSYCHOPHYSICS; RETINAL VESSELS; SCOTOMA; SENSORY THRESHOLDS;

EID: 0032996395     PISSN: 00426989     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0042-6989(98)00295-8     Document Type: Article

References (53)

1. Abe T. Study on angioscotomas in glaucomatous eyes. Acta Societatis Ophthalmologica Japan. 70:1968;59-66.
2. Aulhorn E. Über die Beziehung zwischen Lichtsinn und Sehschärfe. Graefes Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology. 167:1964;4-74.
3. Baumgartner, G., Bornschein, H., Hanitzsch, R., Jung, R., Kornhuber, H.H., Rentschler, I., Schober, H., & Thoden, U. (1978). Sehen. Sinnesphysiologie III. München, Wien, Baltimore: Urban & Schwarzenberg.
4. Bek T., Lund-Andersen H. The influence of stimulus size on perimetric detection of small scotomata. Graefes Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology. 227:1989;531-534.
5. Bek T., Lund-Andersen H. Accurate superimposition of perimetry data onto fundus photographs. Acta Ophthalmologica Copenhagen. 68:1990;11-18.
6. Benda, N., Schiefer, U., & Dietrich, T. J. (1996). How to describe angioscotomata. German Journal Ophthalmology, 5 (Suppl. 1), 127.
7. Béchetoille A. Vascular risk factors in glaucoma. Current Opinion in Ophthalmology. 7:1996;39-43.
8. Chauhan B.C., Henson D.B., Hobley A.J. Cluster analysis in visual field quantification. Documenta Ophthalmologica. 69:1988;25-39.
9. Cibis P.A. Lokaladaptation. Bericht über die Zusammenkunft der Deutschen Ophthalmologischen Gesellschaft. 66:1965;193-202.
10. Cohn T.E. A new hypothesis to explain why the increment threshold exceeds the decrement threshold. Vision Research. 14:1974;1277-1279.
11. Dashevsky A.I. Clinical angioscotometry - a new method with the use of different contrast test objects. Archives of Ophthalmology. 19:1938;334-353.
12. Dietrich, T. J., Selig, B., Friedrich, M., Benda, N., & Schiefer, U. (1996). Calibration routines for video display units for perimetric examinations. German Journal Ophthalmology, 5 (Suppl. 1), 125.
13. Eizenman M., Trope G.E., Fortinsky M., Murphy P.H. Stability of fixation in healthy subjects during automated perimetry. Canadian Journal of Ophthalmology. 27:1992;336-340.
14. Fitzke F.W., McNaught A.I. The diagnosis of visual field progression in glaucoma. Current Science. 5:1994;110-115.
15. Goldmann H. Beitrag zur Angioskotometrie. Ophthalmologica. 114:1947;147-158.
16. Hudson H.L., Frambach D.A., Lopez P.F. Relation of the functional and structural fundus changes after submacular surgery for neovascular age-related macular degeneration. British Journal of Ophthalmology. 79:1995;417-423.
17. Häberlin H., Funkhouser A.T., Fankhauser F. Angioscotoma: Preliminary results using the new spatially adaptive program SAPRO. Greve E.L., Heijl A. Fifth International Visual Field Symposium. 1983;337-343 Dr W. Junk Publishers, The Hague.
18. Langerhorst C.T., Carenini L.L., Bakker D., De Bie-Raakman M.A.C. Measurements for description of very early glaucomatous field defects. Wall M., Heijl A. Perimetry update 1996/1997. 1997;67-73 Kugler, Amsterdam.
19. Littmann H. Zur Bestimmung der wahren Grösse eines Objektes auf dem Hintergrund eines lebenden Auges. Klinische Monatsblätter für Augenheilkunde. 192:1988;66-67.
20. Lutz, S., Dietrich, T. J., Benda, N., Selig, B., Schiefer, U., & Daum, I. (1996). Computer perimetry using different techniques of inquiring answers. German Journal Ophthalmology, 5 (Suppl. 1), 125.
21. Menage M. Medical therapy in chronic open angle glaucoma. CME Journal of Ophthalmolgy. 1:1997;12-13.
22. Miglior S., Rossetti L., Brigatti L., Bujtar E., Orzalesi N. Reproducibility of retinal nerve fiber layer evaluation by dynamic scanning laser ophthalmoscopy. American Journal of Ophthalmology. 118:1994;16-23.
23. Miller D., Benedek G. Intraocular light scattering. 1973;1-121 Charles C Thomas, Springfield, IL, USA.
24. Mutlukan E. Glaucomatous optic neuropathy causes sensitivity loss to light offsets in the visual field. NeuroReport. 4:1993;1159-1162.
25. Mutlukan E. A comparison of automated static dark stimuli with the Humphrey STATPAC program in glaucomatous visual field loss. British Journal of Ophthalmology. 78:1994;175-184.
26. Mutlukan E. Detection sensitivity to light offsets is abnormal in glaucomatous visual field. Documenta Ophthalmologica. 87:1994;245-264.
27. Mutlukan E. Glaucomatous visual field loss detected by threshold light offset stimuli. Mills R.P., Wall M. Perimetry Update 1994/1995. 1995;147 Kugler, Amsterdam.
28. Nishida Y., Kani K. A new fundus perimeter by which the target can automatically pursue eye movement. Wall M., Heijl A. Perimetry Update 1996/1997. 1997;75-79 Kugler Publications, Amsterdam.
29. Orzalesi N., Miglior S., Lonati C., Rossetti L. Microperimetry of localized retional nerve fiber layer defects. Vision Research. 38:1998;763-771.
30. Remky A., Beausencourt E., Elsner A.E. Angioscotometry with the scanning laser ophthalmoscope - Comparison of the effect of different wavelengths. Investigative Ophthalmoly & Visual Science. 37:1996a;2350-2355.
31. Remky, A., Elsner, A. E., Morandi, A., & Beausencourt, E. (1996b). Nasal-temporal asymmetry in the central field assessed by blue-on-yellow perimetry with a SLO. XII IPS Meeting, Würzburg, Program & Abstracts, 56 (abstract).
32. Rohrschneider K., Becker M., Kruse F.E., Fendrich T., Völcker H.E. Stability of fixation: results of fundus-controlled examination using the scanning laser ophthalmoscope. German Journal Ophthalmology. 4:1995a;197-202.
33. Rohrschneider, K., Fendrich, T., Becker, M., & Völcker, H. E. (1995b). Zum Einsatz einer kinetischen funduskontrollierten Perimetrie mit dem Scanning Laser Ophthalmoskop. Ophthalmologica, 92 (Suppl. 1), 52.
34. Rohrschneider K., Glück R., Burk R.O.W., Kruse F.E., Völcker H.E. Macular sparing in patients with hemianopsia - re-evaluated using static and kinetic fundus perimetry. Wall M., Heijl A. Perimetry update 1996/1997. 1997;377-385 Kugler, Amsterdam.
35. Safran A.B., Halfon A., Safran E., Mermoud C. Angioscotomata and morphological features of related vessels in automated perimetry. British Journal of Ophthalmology. 79:1995;118-124.
36. Schiefer U., Stercken-Sorrenti G., Dietrich T.J., Friedrich M., Benda N. Fundus-orientierte Perimetrie-Evaluation eines neuen Gesichtsfeld-Untersuchungsverfahrens bezüglich der Detektion von Angioskotomen. Klinische Monatsblätter für Augenheilkunde. 209:1996a;62-71.
37. Schiefer, U., Stercken-Sorrenti, G., Dietrich, T. J., Selig, B., Benda, N., & Friedrich, M. (1996b). Improvement of diagnostic efficiency by fundus - oriented perimetry. German Journal Ophthalmology, 5 (Suppl. 1), 126.
38. Schiefer, U., & Witte, A. (1996). Patent: Perimetrisches Untersuchungsverfahren - Fundusgestützte Perimetrie II. Deutsches Patentamt München, Az196 21 9612, 1-15.
39. Schneider U., Kuck H., Inhoffen W., Kreissig I. Funduskontrollierte Mikroperimetrie mit dem Scanning-Laser-Ophthalmoskop bei Makulaerkrankungen. Klinische Monatsblätter für Augenheilkunde. 203:1993;212-218.
40. Sjaarda R.N., Frank D.A., Glaser B.M., Thompson J.T., Murphy R.P. Resolution of an absolute scotoma and improvement of relative scotomata after successful macular hole surgery. American Journal of Ophthalmology. 116:1993;129-139.
41. Spillmann L., Kurtenbach A. Dynamic noise backgrounds facilitate target fading. Vision Research. 32:1992;1941-1946.
42. Straub W., Kroll P., Küchle H.J. Augenärztliche Untersuchungsmethoden. 1995;Enke, Stuttgart.
43. Stürmer J. Fundusperimetrie. Gloor B. Perimetrie mit besonderer Berücksichtigung der Automatischen Perimetrie. 1993;149-156 Enke, Stuttgart.
44. Sunness J.S., Schuchard R.A., Shen N., Rubin G.S., Dagnelie G., Haselwood D.M. Landmark-driven fundus perimetry using the scanning laser ophthalmoscope. Investigative Ophthalmoly & Visual Science. 36:1995;1863-1874.
45. Timberlake G.T., Mainster M.A., Webb R.H., Hughes G.W., Trempe C.L. Retinal localization of scotomata by scanning laser ophthalmoscopy. Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science. 22:1982;91-97.
46. Troxler D. Über das Verschwinden gegebener Gegenstände innerhalb unseres Gesichtskreises. Himly K., Schmidt J.A. Ophthalmologische Bibliothek. 1804;1-53 Springer, Jena.
47. Tuulonen A., Lehtola J., Airaksinen P.J. Nerve fiber layer defects with normal visual fields. Do normal optic disc and normal visual field indicate absence of glaucomatous abnormality? Ophthalmology. 100:1993;587-597.
48. Weekers R., Humblet M. L'Angioscotome physiologique. Ophthalmologica. 110:1945;43-59.
49. Welt M. Etude sur les rapports entre les dimensions de la tache aveugle de Mariotte et des angioscotomes, et la tension artérielle rétinienne. Ophthalmologica. 109:1945;137-158.
50. Zalta A.H., Burchfield J.C. Detecting early glaucomatous field defects with the size I stimulus and Statpac. British Journal of Ophthalmology. 74:1990;289-293.
51. Zulauf M. Beitrag zur Angioskotometrie: Stimulusgrösse und Programmwahl. Klinische Monatsblätter für Augenheilkunde. 192:1988;613-618.
52. Zulauf M. Pindolol und Timolol: Short term influence on angioscotomas and static brightness contrast sensitivity. Ophthalmologica. 201:1990;37-44.
53. Zulauf M. Quantification of angioscotomas. Ophthalmologica. 200:1990;203-209.