The role of genes of large effect on inbreeding depression in Mimulus guttatus

Evolution

Volumn 53, Issue 6, 1999, Pages 1678-1691

  Willis, John H ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF OREGON   (United States)

Author keywords

Deleterious mutations; Genetic load; Inbreeding depression; Mimulus; Outcrossing; Self fertilization

Indexed keywords

EVOLUTION; FITNESS; INBREEDING DEPRESSION; LOCAL EXTINCTION; REPRODUCTIVE STRATEGY;

MIMULUS GUTTATUS;

EID: 0033427034     PISSN: 00143820     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1558-5646.1999.tb04553.x     Document Type: Article

References (67)

1. Barrett, S. C. H., and D. Charlesworth. 1991. Effect of a change in the level of inbreeding on the genetic load. Nature 352:522-524.
2. Bowman, J. C., and D. S. Falconer. 1960. Inbreeding depression and heterosis of litter size in mice. Genet. Res. 1:262-274.
3. Bryant, E. H., L. M. Meffert, and S. A. McCommas. 1990. Fitness rebound in serially bottlenecked populations of the house fly. Am. Nat. 136:542-549.
4. Campbell, G. R. 1950. Mimulus guttatus and related species. El Aliso 2:319-335.
5. Campbell, R. B. 1986. The interdependence of mating structure and inbreeding depression. Theor. Popul. Biol. 30:232-244.
6. Carr, D. E., and M. R. Dudash. 1996. Inbreeding depression in two species of Mimulus (Scrophulariaceae) with contrasting mating systems. Am. J. Bot. 83:586-593.
7. _. 1997. The effects of five generations of enforced selfing on potential male and female function in Mimulus guttatus. Evolution 51:1797-1807.
8. Charlesworth, B. 1990. Mutation-selection balance and the evolutionary advantage of sex and recombination. Genet. Res. 55: 199-221.
9. Charlesworth, B., and K. A. Hughes. 1999. The maintenance of genetic variation in life-history traits. Pp. 369-391 in R. S. Singh and C. B. Krimbas, eds. Evolutionary genetics from molecules to morphology. Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge, U.K.
10. Charlesworth, D., and B. Charlesworth. 1987. Inbreeding depression and its evolutionary consequences. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 18:237-268.
11. Charlesworth, D., M. T. Morgan, and B. Charlesworth. 1990. Inbreeding depression, genetic load and the evolution of outcrossing rates in a multi-locus system with no linkage. Evolution 44: 1469-1489.
12. Connor, J. L., and M. J. Bellucci. 1979. Natural selection resisting inbreeding depression in captive wild housemice (Mus musculus). Evolution 33:929-940.
13. Crow, J. F. 1993. Mutation, mean fitness, and genetic load. Oxf. Surv. Evol. Biol. 9:3-42.
14. Crow, J. F., and M. Kimura. 1970. An introduction to population genetics theory. Harper and Row, New York.
15. Crow, J. F., and M. J. Simmons. 1983. The mutation load in Drosophila. Pp. 1-35 in H. L. C. M. Ashburner and J. N. Thomson, eds. The genetics and biology of Drosophila. Academic Press, London.
16. Darwin, C. R. 1876. The effects of cross and self fertilization in the vegetable kingdom. John Murray, London.
17. Dole, J. A., and K. Ritland. 1993. Inbreeding depression in two Mimulus taxa measured by multigenerational changes in the inbreeding coefficient. Evolution 47:361-373.
18. Dudash, M. R. 1993. Variation in pollen limitation amaong individuals of Sabatia angularis (Gentianaceae). Ecology 74:959-962.
19. Dudash, M. R., and D. E. Carr. 1998. Genetic underlying inbreeding depression in Mimulus with contrasting mating systems. Nature 393:682-684.
20. Dudash, M. R., D. E. Carr, and C. B. Fenster. 1997. Five generations of enforced selfing and outcrossing in Mimulus guttatus: inbreeding depression variation at the population and family level. Evolution 51:54-65.
21. Falconer, D. S. 1971. Improvement of litter size in a strain of mice at a selection limit. Genet. Res. 17:215-235.
22. Fenster, C. B., and M. R. Dudash. 1994. Genetic considerations for plant population restoration and conservation. Pp. 34-62 in M. L. Bowles and C. J. Whelan, eds. Restoration of endangered species. Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge, U.K.
23. Fisher, R. A. 1941. Average excess and average effect of a gene substiution. Ann. Eugen. 11:53-63.
24. Garcia, N., C. Lopez-Fanjul, and A. Garcia-Dorado. 1994. The genetics of viability in Drosophila melanogaster: effects of inbreeding and artificial selection. Evolution 48:1277-1285.
25. Grant, A. L. 1924. A monograph of the genus Mimulus. Ann. Mo. Bot. Gard. 11:99-389.
26. Hedrick, P. W. 1994. Purging inbreeding depression and the probability of extinction: full-sib mating. Heredity 73:363-372.
27. Hedrick, P. W., and P. S. Miller. 1992. Conservation genetics: techniques and fundamentals. Ecol. Appl. 2:30-46.
28. Hollingsworth, M. J., and J. Maynard Smith. 1955. The effects of inbreeding on rate of development and on fertility in Drosophila subobscura. J. Genet. 53:295-314.
29. Holsinger, K. E. 1988. Inbreeding depression doesn't matter: the genetic basis of mating system evolution. Evolution 42:1235-1244.
30. Husband, B. C., and D. W. Schemske. 1996. Evolution of the magnitude and timing of inbreeding depression in plants. Evolution 50:54-70.
31. Jarne, P., and D. Charlesworth. 1993. The evolution of the selfing rate in functionally hermaphroditic plants and animals. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 24:441-466.
32. Jinks, J. L. 1983. Biometrical genetics of heterosis. Pp. 1-46 in R. Frankel, ed. Heterosis: reappraisal of theory and practice. Springer-Verlag, Berlin.
33. Johnston, M. O., and D. J. Schoen. 1994. On the measurement of inbreeding depression. Evolution 48:1735-1741.
34. Kearns, C. A., and D. W. Inouye. 1993. Techniques for pollination biologists. University Press of Colorado, Niwot, CO.
35. Lande, R., and D. W. Schemske. 1985. The evolution of self-fertilization and inbreeding depression in plants. I. Genetic models. Evolution 39:24-40.
36. Latta, R., and K. Ritland. 1994. The relationship between inbreeding depression and prior inbreeding among populations of four Mimulus taxa. Evolution 48:806-817.
37. Latter, B. H. D., J. C. Mulley, D. Reid, and L. Pascoe. 1995. Reduced genetic load revealed by slow inbreeding in Drosophila melanogaster. Genetics 139:287-297.
38. Lewontin, R. C. 1974. The genetic basis of evolutionary change. Columbia Univ. Press, New York.
39. Lin, J.-Z., and K. Ritland. 1997. Quantitative trait loci differentiating the outbreeding Mimulus guttatus from the inbreeding Mimulus platycalyx. Genetics 146:1115-1121.
40. Lloyd, D. G. 1979. Some reproductive factors affecting the selection of self-fertilization in plants. Am. Nat. 113:67-79.
41. Lynch, C. B. 1977. Inbreeding effects upon animals derived from a wild population of Mus musculus. Evolution 31:526-537.
42. Lynch, M. 1988. Design and analysis of experiments on random genetic drift and inbreeding depression. Genetics 120:791-807.
43. _. 1996. A quantitative-genetic perspective on conservation issues. Pp. 471-501 in J. Avise and J. Hamrick, eds. Conservation genetics: case histories from nature. Chapman and Hall, New York.
44. Lynch, M., J. Conery, and R. Burger. 1995. Mutation accumulation and the extinction of small populations. Am. Nat. 146:489-518.
45. Mather, K., and J. L. Jinks. 1982. Biometrical genetics. 3d ed. Chapman and Hall, London.
46. Moll, R. H., M. F. Lindsley, and H. F. Robinson. 1964. Estimates of genetic variances and level of dominance in maize. Genetics 49:411-423.
47. Pennell, F. W. 1951. Mimulus. Pp. 688-731 in L. Abrams, ed. Illustrated flora of the pacific states. Stanford Univ. Press, Palo Alto, CA.
48. Radford, A. E., W. C. Dickson, J. R. Massey, and C. R. Bell. 1974. Vascular plant systematics. Harper and Row, New York.
49. Ritland, K. 1990. Inferences about inbreeding depression based upon changes of the inbreeding coefficient. Evolution 44:1230-1241.
50. Ritland, K., and F. R. Ganders. 1987a. Covariation of selfing rates with parental gene fixation indices within populations of Mimulus guttatus. Evolution 41:760-771.
51. _. 1987b. Crossability of Mimulus guttatus in relation to components of gene fixation. Evolution 41:772-786.
52. Schultz, S. T., and J. H. Willis. 1995. Individual variation in inbreeding depression: the roles of inbreeding history and mutation. Genetics 141:1209-1223.
53. Shull, G. H. 1952. Beginnings of the heterosis concept. Pp. 14-48 in J. W. Gowen, ed. Heterosis. Iowa Univ. Press, Ames.
54. Simmons, M. J., and J. F. Crow. 1977. Mutations affecting fitness in Drosophila populations. Annu. Rev. Genet. 11:49-78.
55. Sokal, R. R., and F. J. Rohlf. 1981. Biometry. 2d ed. Freeman. New York.
56. Sprague, G. F. 1983. Heterosis in maize: theory and practice. Pp. 48-70 in R. Frankel, ed. Heterosis: reappraisal of theory and practice. Springer-Verlag, Berlin.
57. Sweigart, A., K. Karoly, A. Jones, and J. H. Willis. 1999. The distribution of individual inbreeding coefficients and pairwise relatedness in a population of Mimulus guttatus. Heredity: In press.
58. Templeton, A. R., and B. Read. 1983. The elimination of inbreeding depression in a captive herd of Speke's gazelle. Pp. 241-262 in C. M. Schonewald-Cox, S. M. Chambers, B. Macbryde, and L. Thomas, eds. Genetics and conservation. Benjamin/Cummings, Menlo Park, CA.
59. _. 1984. Factors eliminating inbreeding depression in a captive herd of Speke's gazelle (Gazella spekei). Zoo Biol. 3:177-199.
60. Vickery, R. K., Jr. 1978. Case studies in the evolution of species complexes in Mimulus. Evol. Biol. 11:405-507.
61. Willis, J. H. 1992. Genetic analysis of inbreeding depression caused by chlorophyll-deficient lethals in Mimulus guttatus. Heredity 69:562-572.
62. _. 1993a. Partial self-fertilization and inbreeding depression in two populations of Mimulus guttatus. Heredity 71:145-154.
63. _. 1993b. Effects of different levels of inbreeding on fitness components in Mimulus guttatus. Evolution 47:864-876.
64. _. 1996. Measures of phenotypic selection are biased by partial inbreeding. Evolution 50:1501-1511.
65. _. 1999a. The contribution of male sterility mutations to inbreeding depression in Mimulus guttatus. Heredity 83:337-346.
66. _. 1999b. Inbreeding load, average dominance, and the mutation rate for mildly deleterious alleles in Mimulus guttatus. Genetics: In press.
67. Wright, S. 1977. Evolution and the genetics of populations. Vol. 3. Experimental results and evolutionary deductions. Univ. of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL.