Optimal design and modeling of spatial parallel manipulators

International Journal of Robotics Research

Volumn 23, Issue 2, 2004, Pages 127-140

  Miller, Karol ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WESTERN AUSTRALIA   (Australia)

Author keywords

Design; Dynamics; Manipulability; Parallel robot; Workspace

Indexed keywords

ALGORITHMS; CONTROL SYSTEM SYNTHESIS; DYNAMICS; HAMILTONIANS; INVERSE PROBLEMS; KINEMATICS; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; MOTION CONTROL; OPTIMIZATION;

MANIPULABILITY; PARALLEL MANIPULATORS; WORKSPACE;

MANIPULATORS;

EID: 1242288211     PISSN: 02783649     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0278364904041322     Document Type: Article

References (45)

1. An, C. H., Atkeson, C. G., Griffiths, J. M., and Hollerbach, J. M. 1989. Experimental evaluation of feedforward and computed torque control. IEEE Transactions on Robotics and Automation 5(3):368-373.
2. Arai, T., and Tanikawa, T. 1996. Development of a new parallel manipulator with fixed linear actuator. In Proceedings of Japan/USA Symposium on Flexible Automation, Vol. 1, ASME, New York, pp. 145-149.
3. Badano, F., Betempts, M., Burckhardt, C. W., Clavel, R., and Jutard, A. 1993. Assembly of chamferless parts using a fast robot. In Proceedings of the 24th International Symposium on Industrial Robots, Tokyo, Japan, pp. 89-96.
4. Baiges, I. J., and Duffy, J. 1996. Dynamic modeling of parallel manipulators. In Proceedings of the 1996 ASME Design Engineering Technical Conference, Paper No. 96-DETC/MECH-1136.
5. Baumgarte, J. 1972. Stabilization of constraints and integrals of motion in dynamical systems. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering 1:1-16.
6. Bayo, E., and Garcia de Jalon, J. 1994. Kinematic and Dynamic Simulation of Multibody Systems: The Real-Time Challenge, Springer-Verlag, New York.
7. Blajer, W. 1992. A projection method approach to constrained system analysis. ASME Journal of Applied Mechanics 59(3):643-649.
8. Blajer, W. 1998. Methods of Multibody System Dynamics, Technical University of Radom Publishers, Radom, Poland.
9. Brenan, K. E., Campbel, S. L., and Petzold, L. R. 1989. The Numerical Solution of Initial Value Problems in Differential-Algebraic Equations, Elsevier Science, Amsterdam.
10. Clavel, R. 1988. Delta, a fast robot with parallel geometry. In Proceedings of the 18th International Symposium on Industrial Robots, Lausanne, Switzerland, pp. 91-100.
11. Etemadi, K., Zanganeh, K., Sinatra, R., and Angeles, J. 1997. Kinematics and dynamics of a six-degrees-of-freedom parallel manipulator with revolute legs. Robotica 15:385-394.
12. Frame, N. 1999. The Lagrange-based model of NUWAR dynamics. BEng. Honours Thesis, Department of Mechanical and Materials Engineering, The University of Western Australia, Crawley/Perth.
13. Gosselin, C., and Angeles, J. 1989. The optimum kinematic design of a spherical three-degrees-of-freedom parallel manipulator. ASME Journal of Mechanisms, Transmissions and Automation in Design 111(2):202-207.
14. Guglielmetti, P. 1994. Model-based control of fast parallel robots: a global approach in operational space. PhD Thesis No. 1228, Swiss Federal Institute of Technology, Laussane.
15. Gutowski, R. 1971. Analytical Mechanics, PWN, Warsaw, Poland.
16. Herve, J. M. 1994. Methodological design of new parallel robots via the Lie group of displacements. In Proceedings of CISM/IFToMM Conference Ro.Man.Sy. '94, Gdansk, Poland, pp. 301-306.
17. Lanczos, C. 1962. The Variational Principles of Mechanics, University of Toronto Press, Toronto.
18. Lankarani, H. M., and Nikravesh, P. E. 1988. Application of the canonical equations of motion in problems of constrained multibody systems with intermittent motion. In Advances in Design Automation, S. S. Rao, editor, ASME, New York, Vol. 14, pp. 417-423.
19. LePage, S. 1999. Trajectory generation. BEng. Honours Thesis, Department of Mechanical and Materials Engineering, The University of Western Australia, Crawley/Perth.
20. Liegois, A., Fournier, A., and Aldom, M. 1980. Model reference control of high-velocity industrial robots. In Proceedings of Joint Automatic Control Conference, San Francisco, CA.
21. Lin, Y. J. and Song, S. M. 1990. A comparative study of inverse dynamics of manipulators with closed-chain geometry. Journal of Robotic Systems 7:507-534.
22. Luh, J. Y. S. and Zheng, Y. F. 1985. Computation of input generalized forces for robots with closed kinematic chain mechanisms. IEEE Journal of Robotics and Automation 1:95-103.
23. Luh, M., Walker, M. W., and Paul, R. C. 1980. Resolved acceleration control of mechanical manipulators. IEEE Transactions on Robotics and Automation 25(3):468-474.
24. MATLAB. 1999. Version 5.3, Student Edition, Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ.
25. Merlet, J. P. 2000. Parallel Robots, Kluwer Academic, Dordrecht.
26. Miller, K. 1995. Experimental verification of modeling of Delta robot dynamics by direct application of Hamilton's principle. In IEEE Conference on Robotics and Automation, Nagoya, Japan, pp. 532-537.
27. Miller, K. 1998. Parallel robot. Australian Provisional Patent Application No. PP7518.
28. Miller, K. 2002. Maximization of workspace volume of 3-dof spatial parallel manipulators. Transactions of the ASME, Journal of Mechanical Design 124(2):347-350.
29. Miller, K., and Clavel, R. 1992. The Lagrange-based model of Delta-4 robot dynamics. Robotersysteme 8, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, pp. 49-54.
30. Nakamura, Y., and Ghodoussi, M. 1989. Dynamics computation of closed-link robot mechanisms with non-redundant and redundant actuators. IEEE Transactions on Robotics and Automation 5(3):294-302.
31. Nenchev, D. N., Bhattacharya, S., and Uchiyama, M. 1997. Dynamic analysis of parallel manipulator under the singularity-consistent parametrization. Robotica 15(4):375-384.
32. Pierrot, F., Dauchez, P., and Fournier, A. 1991. Hexa, a fast 6-degree-of-freedom fully parallel robot. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Advanced Robotics, Pisa, Italy, Vol. 2/2, pp. 1158-1163.
33. Pollard, W. L. V. 1942. Position controlling apparatus, US Patent No. 2,286,571.
34. Stamper, R. E., Tsai, L.-W., and Walsh, G. C. 1997. Optimization of a three DOF translational platform for well-conditioned workspace. In Proceedings of the 1997 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, IEEE, Piscataway, NJ, Vol. 4, pp. 3250-3255.
35. Stewart, D. 1966. A platform with six degrees of freedom. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part I, 180(15):371-386.
36. Stock, M. 2000. The Linear Delta robot. BEng. Honours Thesis, Department of Mechanical and Materials Engineering, The University of Western Australia, Crawley/Perth.
37. Stock, M., and Miller, K. 2003. Optimal kinematic design of spatial parallel manipulators; application to Linear Delta robot. ASME Journal of Mechanical Design 125(2):292-301.
38. Tsai, L. W. 1997. Multi-degree-of-freedom mechanisms for machine tools and the like, US Patent No. 5,656,905.
39. Tsai, L. W. 1999. Robot Analysis: The Mechanics of Serial and Parallel Manipulators, Wiley, New York.
40. Tsai, L. W. 2000. Solving the inverse dynamics of Stewart-Gough manipulator by the principle of virtual work. ASME Journal of Mechanical Design 122:3-9.
41. Tsumaki, Y., Narusew, H., Nenchev, D. N., and Uchiyama, M. 1998. Design of compact 6-dof interface. In Proceedings of 1998 IEEE Conference on Robotics and Automation, pp. 2581-2585.
42. Uchiyama, M. 1994. A 6 d.o.f. parallel robot HEXA. Advanced Robotics 8(6):601.
43. Wang, J., and Gosselin, C. M. 1998. A new approach for the dynamic analysis of parallel manipulators. Multibody System Dynamics 2:317-334.
44. Wolfram, S. 1999. The Mathematica Book, Cambridge University Pres, Cambridge.
45. Zhang, C. D., and Song, S. M. 1993. An efficient method for inverse dynamics of manipulators based on virtual work principle. Journal of Robotic Systems 10(5):605-627.