2-AFC observer study of shape and contrast discrimination in digital stereomammography

Progress in Biomedical Optics and Imaging - Proceedings of SPIE

Volumn 5, Issue 26, 2004, Pages 62-71

  Maidment, Andrew D A ^a   Karasick, Todd ^a   Bakic, Predrag R ^a   Albert, Michael ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA   (United States)

Author keywords

2 AFC Observer Study; Digital Mammography; Observer Performance; Stereomammography

Indexed keywords

2-AFC OBSERVER STUDY; DIGITAL MAMMOGRAPHY; OBSERVER PERFORMANCE; STEREOMAMMOGRAPHY;

ACOUSTIC NOISE; ATTENUATION; IMAGING TECHNIQUES; PATIENT MONITORING; QUANTUM THEORY; RADIATION; SIGNAL TO NOISE RATIO; X RAY ANALYSIS;

MAMMOGRAPHY;

EID: 12144274407     PISSN: 16057422     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1117/12.537080     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (29)

1. A.D.A. Maidment and M.J. Yaffe. Scanned-slot digital mammography. In Medical Imaging IV: Image Formation, Proceedings of the SPIE 1231:316-326 (1990).
2. A.D.A. Maidment, M.J. Yaffe, D.B. Plewes, G.E. Mawdsley, I.C. Soutar, and B.G. Starkoski. Imaging performance of a prototype scanned-slot digital mammography system. In: Medical Imaging VII: Physics of Medical Imaging, Proceedings of the SPIE 1896:93-103 (1993).
3. E.D. Pisano, M.J. Yaffe, B.M. Hemminger, R.E. Hendrick, L.T. Niklason, A.D.A. Maidment, C.M. Kimme-Smith, S.A. Feig, E. A. Sickles, and M.P. Braeuning. Current Status of Full-Field Digital Mammography. Academic Radiology, 7:266-280 (2000).
4. Feig SA. Yaffe M.J. Digital mammography. Radiographies. 18:893-901 (1998).
5. R. Aufrichtig, P. Xue, Dose efficiency and low-contrast detectability of an amorphous silicon x-ray detector for digital radiography Phys. Med. Biol. 45:2653-2669 (2000).
6. E. Samei and M.J. Flynn, An experimental comparison of detector performance for direct and indirect digital radiography systems. Med. Phys. 30:608-622 (2003).
7. E.A. Berns, R.E. Hendrick, and G.R. Cutter, Optimization of technique factors for a silicon diode array full-field digital mammography system and comparison to screen-film mammography with matched average glandular dose. Med. Phys. 30:334-340 (2003).
8. E.B. Cole, E.D. Pisano, E.O. Kistner, K.E. Muller, M.E. Brown, S.A. Feig, R.A. Jong, A.D.A. Maidment, M.J. Staiger, C.M. Kuzmiak, R.I Freimanis, N. Lesko, E.L. Rosen, R. Walsh, M. Williford and M.P. Braeuning. Diagnostic Accuracy of Digital Mammography in Patients with Dense Breasts who underwent Problem-Solving Mammography: Effects of Image Processing and Lesion Type. Radiology, 226:153-160 (2003).
9. Lewin JM, D'Orsi CJ, Hendrick RE, et al. Clinical comparison of full-field digital mammography and screen-film mammography for detection of breast cancer. Am J Roentgenol 179:671-677 (2002).
10. M. Skarpathiotakis, M J, Yaffe, et al., Development of contrast digital mammography. Med. Phys. 29:2419-2426 (2002).
11. RA Jong, MJ Yaffe, M Skarpathiotakis, et al. Contrast digital mammography: Initial clinical experience. Radiology, 228:842-850 (2003).
12. F.Diekman et al., Use of Iodine-based Contrast Media in Digital Full-field Mammography-Initial Experience, Fortschr. Röntgenstr 175, 342-345 (2003).
13. Lewin JM, Isaacs PK, Vance V, Larke FJ. Dual-energy contrast-enhanced digital subtraction mammography - feasibility. Radiology, 229:261-8 (2003).
14. A.D.A. Maidment and M. Albert. Tissue Discrimination Methods in Mammography. In Advances in Digital Radiography edited by Ehsan Samei, Radiological Society of North America, 189-197 (2003)
15. David J. Getty, Stereoscopic and Biplane Imaging. In Advances in Digital Radiography edited by Ehsan Samei, Radiological Society of North America, 199-209 (2003)
16. Niklason LT, Christian BT, Niklason LE, et al. Digital tomosynthesis in breast imaging. Radiology 205:399-406 (1997).
17. Elizabeth A. Rafferty, Breast Tomosynthesis, In Advances in Digital Radiography edited by Ehsan Samei, Radiological Society of North America, 219-226 (2003)
18. A.D.A. Maidment, P.R. Bakic, and M. Albert. Effects of quantum noise and binocular summation on dose requirements in stereoradiography. Med. Phys., 30:3061-3071 (2003).
19. P.R. Bakic, M. Albert, and A.D.A. Maidment. Dose Requirements in Stereoradiography. In Physics of Medical Imaging edited by L. Antonuk and M.J. Yaffe, Proceedings of the SPIE, 4682:126-137 (2002).
20. P.R. Bakic, M. Albert, and A.D.A. Maidment "2-AFC Observer Study of Digital Stereomammography". In Image Perception, Observer Performance and Technology Assessment edited by D.P. Chakraborty and E.A. Krupinski, Proceedings of the SPIE, 5034:1-9 (2003).
21. J. M. Boone, N. Shah, and T. R. Nelson, A comprehensive analysis of DgNCT coefficients for pendant-geometry cone-beam breast computed tomography. Med. Phys. 31:226-235 (2004).
22. H. Kundel, C. Nodine, L. Toto et ed., A circle cue enhances detection of simulated masses on mammographic backgrounds, in Medical Imaging 1997, Image Perception, edited by H.L. Kundel, Proceedings of the SPIE, 3032:81-84, 1997.
23. DICOM Standard PS-3.14-2000: Gray-scale Standard Display Function, National Electrical Manufacturers Association, Roslyn, VA, 2000.
24. A.E. Burgess, Comparison of receiver operating characteristics and forced choice observer performance measurement methods. Med. Phys. 22:643-655 (1995).
25. J. Hsu, D.M. Chalberg, C.F. Babbs, Z. Pizlo, and E. Delp, Preclinical ROC studies of digital Stereomammography. IEEE Trans. Med. Imaging 14:318-327 (1995).
26. T. Wu, R.H. Moore, E.A. Rafferty, and D.B. Kopans. Measurement of X-ray attenuation coefficient of breast tissue and tumor in digital tomosynthesis (abstr.). In: RSNA Scientific Assembly and Annual Meeting Program (RSNA, Oak Brook, IL, 2003), 425.
27. P.R. Bakic, M. Albert, D. Brzakovic, and A.D.A. Maidment. Mammogram Synthesis using a 3-D simulation: I. Breast Tissue Model and the exam simulation. Med. Phys., 29:2131-2139 (2002)
28. P.R. Bakic, M. Albert, D. Brzakovic, and A.D.A. Maidment. Mammogram Synthesis using a 3-D simulation: II. Evaluation of Synthetic Mammogram Texture. Med. Phys., 29:2140-2151 (2002)
29. P.R. Bakic, M. Albert, D. Brzakovic, and A.D.A. Maidment. Mammogram Synthesis using a three-dimensional simulation: HI. Modeling and evaluation of the breast ductal network. Med. Phys., 30:1914-1925 (2003)