Digital Mammography

Radiographics

Volumn 18, Issue 4, 1998, Pages 893-901

  Feig, Stephen A ^a   Yaffe, Martin J ^b  

^a THOMAS JEFFERSON UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (United States)

^b SUNNYBROOK RESEARCH INSTITUTE   (Canada)

Author keywords

Breast radiography, technology; Radiography, digital, 00.1215

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; BREAST TUMOR; COMPUTER ASSISTED DIAGNOSIS; EQUIPMENT DESIGN; FEMALE; HUMAN; IMAGE PROCESSING; IMAGE QUALITY; INSTRUMENTATION; MAMMOGRAPHY; MASS SCREENING; RADIOGRAPHY; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; X RAY FILM;

BREAST NEOPLASMS; DIAGNOSIS, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; EQUIPMENT DESIGN; FEMALE; HUMANS; IMAGE PROCESSING, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; MAMMOGRAPHY; MASS SCREENING; RADIOGRAPHIC IMAGE ENHANCEMENT; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; X-RAY INTENSIFYING SCREENS;

EID: 0032119379     PISSN: 02715333     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1148/radiographics.18.4.9672974     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Tabar L, Fagerberg G, Chen H-H, et al. Efficacy of breast cancer screening by age: new results from the Swedish Two-County Trial. Cancer 1995; 75:2507-2517.
2. Andersson I, Janzon L. Reduced breast cancer mortality in women under 50: updated results from Malmö Mammographic Screening Program. Monogr Natl Cancer Inst 1997; 22:63-68.
3. Bjurstam N, Bjorneld L, Duffy SW, et al. The Gothenburg Breast Screening Trial: first result on mortality, incidence, and mode of detection for women ages 39-49 years at randomization. Cancer 1997; 80:2091-2099.
4. Hendrick RE, Smith RA, Rutledge JH III, Smart CR. Benefit of screening mammography for women aged 40-49: a new meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Monogr Natl Cancer Inst 1997; 22:87-92.
5. Feig SA. Estimation of currently attainable benefit from mammography screening of women aged 40-49 years. Cancer 1995; 75:2412-2419.
6. Falun Meeting Committee and Collaborators. Falun meeting on breast cancer screening with mammography in women aged 40-49 years: report of the organizing committee and collaborators. Int J Cancer 1996; 58:693-699.
7. Feig SA. Increased benefit from shorter mammography screening intervals for women age 40-49 years. Cancer 1997; 80:2035-2039.
8. Sickles EA, Kopans DB. Deficiencies in the analysis of breast cancer screening data. J Natl Cancer Inst 1993; 85:1621-1624.
9. Sickles EA, Ominsky SH, Sollito RA, Galvin HB, Monticciolo DL. Medical audit of a rapid-throughput mammography screening practice: methodology and results of 27,114 examinations. Radiology 1990; 175:323-327.
10. Sickles EA. Breast cancer screening outcomes in women ages 40-49: clinical experience with service screening using modern mammography. Monogr Natl Cancer Inst 1997; 22: 99-104.
11. Smith RA. The epidemiology of breast cancer. In: Kopans DB, Mendelson E, eds. Syllabus: a categorical course in breast imaging. Oak Brook, III: Radiological Society of North America, 1995; 7-20.
12. Jackson VP, Hendrick RE, Feig SA, et al. Imaging the radiographically dense breast. Radiology 1993; 188:297-301.
13. Pisano ED, Chandramouli J, Hemminger BM, et al. Does intensity windowing improve the detection of simulated calcifications in dense mammograms? J Digit Imaging 1997; 10:79-84.
14. Williams MB, Fajardo LL. Digital mammography: performance considerations and current detector designs. Acad Radiol 1996; 3:429-437.
15. Yaffe MJ, Plewes DB, Mawdsley GE, et al. Full-field digital mammography-system development and technical performance. In: Doi K, Giger ML, Nishikawa RM, Schmidt RA, eds. Digital mammography. New York, NY: Elsevier, 1996; 125-132.
16. Vyborny CJ, Giger ML. Computer vision and artificial intelligence in mammography. AJR 1994; 162:699-708.
17. Vyborny CJ. Can computers help radiologists read mammograms? Radiology 1994; 191:315-317.
18. Feig SA, Yaffe MJ. Digital mammography, computer-aided diagnosis, and telemammography. Radiol Clin North Am 1995; 33:1205-1230.
19. Abdel-Malek A. Experience with a proposed teleradiology system for digital mammography. Proc SPIE 1995; 2435:200-209.
20. Lou SL, Sickles EA, Huang HK, Cao F, Hoogstrate D, Jahangiri M. Full-field direct digital telemammography: preliminary results. Proc SPIE 1997; 3035:369-379.
21. Johns PC, Yaffe MJ. Theoretical optimization of dual-energy x-ray imaging with application to mammography. Med Phys 1985; 12:289-296.
22. Niklason LT, Christian BT, Niklason LE, et al. Digital tomosynthesis in breast imaging. Radiology 1997; 205:399-406.
23. Cheung L, Coe RA. Full-field single-exposure digital mammography system. Med Electron 1995, vol 50.
24. Rougeot H. Direct x-ray photoconversion processes. In: Hendee WR, Trueblood JH, eds. Digital imaging. Madison, Wis: Medical Physics, 1993; 49-96.