Severity and stability of glaucoma patient perception compared with objective measurement

Archives of Ophthalmology

Volumn 117, Issue 4, 1999, Pages 450-454

  Viswanathan, Ananth C ^b   McNaught, Andrew I ^b   Poinoosawmy, Darmalingun ^b   Fontana, Luigi ^b   Crabb, David P ^b   Fitzke, Fred W ^a   Hitchings, Roger A ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

^b NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; BINOCULAR VISION; DISABILITY; DISEASE SEVERITY; GLAUCOMA; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUESTIONNAIRE; SCORING SYSTEM; VISUAL IMPAIRMENT;

EID: 0032925353     PISSN: 00039950     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1001/archopht.117.4.450     Document Type: Article

References (37)

1. Foster A, Johnson GJ. Magnitude and causes of blindness in the developing world. Int Ophthalmol. 1990;14:135-140.
2. Quigley HA. Number of people with glaucoma worldwide. Br J Ophthalmol. 1996; 80:389-393.
3. Thylefors B, Negrel AD. The global impact of glaucoma. Bull World Health Organ. 1994;72:323-326.
4. Coffey M, Reidy A, Wormald R, Xian WX, Wright L, Courtney P. Prevalence of glaucoma in the west of Ireland. Br J Ophthalmol. 1993;77:17-21.
5. Munton G. Vision. In: Taylor JF, ed. Medical Aspects of Fitness to Drive. 5th ed. London, England: Medical Commission on Accident Prevention; 1995:118-132.
6. Esterman B. Grid for scoring visual fields, II: perimeter. Arch Ophthalmol. 1968; 79:400-406.
7. Esterman B. Functional scoring of the binocular field. Ophthalmology. 1982;89: 1226-1234.
8. Mills RP, Drance SM. Esterman disability rating in severe glaucoma. Ophthalmology. 1986;93:371-378.
9. Zulauf M, Caprioli J. What constitutes progression of visual field detects? Semin Ophthalmol. 1992;7:130-146.
10. Hoskins HD, Jensvold N, Zaretsky M, Hetherington J. Rate of progression of discrete areas of the visual field. In: Heijl A, ed. Perimetry Update 1988/1989. Amsterdam, the Netherlands: Kugler & Ghedini; 1989:173-176.
11. Mikelberg FS. Do computerised visual fields and automated optic disc analysis assist in the choice of therapy in glaucoma? Eye. 1992;6(pt 1):47-49.
12. Hitchings K. Psychophysical testing in glaucoma. Br J Ophthalmol. 1993;77: 471-472.
13. Johnson CA. Modern developments in clinical perimetry. Curr Opin Ophthalmol. 1993;4:7-13.
14. Fitzke FW, McNaught AI. The diagnosis of visual field progression in glaucoma. Curr Opin Ophthalmol. 1994;5:110-115.
15. Smith SD, Katz J, Quigley HA. Analysis of progressive change in automated visual fields in glaucoma. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1996;37:1419-1428.
16. Werner EB, Bishop KI, Koelle J, et al. A comparison of experienced clinical observers and statistical tests in detection of progressive visual field loss in glaucoma using automated perimetry. Arch Ophthalmol. 1988;106:619-623.
17. Weber J, Koll W, Krieglstein GK. Intraocular pressure and visual field decay in chronic-glaucoma. Ger J Ophthalmol. 1993;2:165-169.
18. Wegner A, Ugi I, Hofman A. A long-term visual field evaluation of glaucoma patients treated topically with timolol or carteolol. In: Mills RP, ed. Perimetry Update 1992/1993. Amsterdam, the Netherlands: Kugler & Ghedini; 1993: 143-145.
19. Holmin C, Krakau CE. Regression analysis of the central visual field in chronic glaucoma cases. Acta Ophthalmol (Copenh). 1982;60:267-274.
20. Wu O, Schwartz B, Nagin P. Trend analyses of automated visual fields. Doc Ophthalmol Proc Ser. 1987;49:175-189.
21. O'Brien C, Schwartz B, Takamoto T, Wu DC. Intraocular pressure and the rate of visual field loss in chronic open-angle glaucoma. Am J Ophthalmol. 1991;111: 491-500.
22. Wild JM, Hussey MK, Flanagan JG, Trope GE. Pointwise topographical and longitudinal modeling of the visual field in glaucoma. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1993;34:1907-1916.
23. O'Brien C, Schwartz B. The visual field in chronic open-angle glaucoma. Eye. 1990; 4(pt4):557-562.
24. Chauhan BC, Drance SM, Douglas GR. The use of visual field indices in detecting changes in the visual field in glaucoma. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1990;31: 512-520.
25. Birch MK, Wishart PK, O'Donnell N. Determining progressive field loss. In: Mills RP, Wall M, eds. Perimetry Update 1994/1995. Amsterdam, the Netherlands: Kugler & Ghedini; 1995:31-36.
26. Fitzke FW, Hitchings RA, Poinoosawmy D, McNaught AI, Crabb DP. Analysis of visual field progression in glaucoma. Br J Ophthalmol. 1996;80:40-48.
27. Noureddin BN, Poinoosawmy D, Fitzke FW, Hitchings RA. Regression analysis of visual field progression in low tension glaucoma. Br J Ophthalmol. 1991;75: 493-495.
28. Poinoosawmy D, Wu J, Fitzke FW, Hitchings RA. Discrimination between progression and non-progression visual field loss in low tension glaucoma using MDT. In: Mills-RP, ed. Perimetry Update 1992/1993. Amsterdam, the Netherlands: Kugler & Ghedini; 1993:109-114.
29. McNaught AI, Crabb DP, Fitzke FW, Hitchings RA. Modelling series of visual fields to detect progression in normal tension glaucoma. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 1995;233:750-755.
30. McNaught AI, Crabb DP, Fitzke FW, Hitchings RA. Visual field progression. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 1996;234:411-418.
31. Bhandari A, Crabb DP, Poinoosawmy D, Fitzke FW, Hitchings RA, Noureddin BN. Effect of surgery on visual field progression in normal-tension glaucoma. Ophthalmology. 1997;104:1131-1137.
32. Koseki N, Araie M, Shirato S, Yamamoto S. Effect of trabeculectomy on visual field performance in central 30 degrees field in progressive normal-tension glaucoma. Ophthalmology. 1997;104:197-201.
33. Heijl A, Lindgren G, Olsson J. Normal variability of static perimetric threshold values across the central visual field. Arch Ophthalmol. 1987;105:1544-1549.
34. Bland JM, Altman DG. Multiple significance tests: the Bonferroni method. BMJ. 1995;310:170.
35. Choy ES, Mills RP, Drance SM. Automated Esterman testing of disability in glaucoma. In: Greve E, Heijl A, eds. Seventh International Visual Field Symposium. Amsterdam, the Netherlands: Junk Publishers; 1986:527-535.
36. Parrish RK II. Visual impairment, visual functioning, and quality of life assessments in patients with glaucoma. Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc. 1996;94:919-1028.
37. Parrish RK II, Gedde SJ, Scott IU, et al. Visual function and quality of life among patients with glaucoma. Arch Ophthalmol. 1997;115:1447-1455.