A method for the determination of flux in elementary modes, and its application to Lactobacillus rhamnosus

Biotechnology and Bioengineering

Volumn 88, Issue 5, 2004, Pages 601-612

  Poolman, M G ^a   Venkatesh, K V ^b   Pidcock, M K ^a   Fell, D A ^a  

^a OXFORD BROOKES UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

^b INDIAN INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY BOMBAY   (India)

Author keywords

Elementary modes; Flux assignment; Metabolic modeling

Indexed keywords

FERMENTATION; FLUXES; METABOLISM;

LACTOBACILLUS RHAMNOSUS; METABOLIC FLUX ANALYSIS; REACTION FLUXES;

BACTERIA;

ANALYTIC METHOD; ARTICLE; COMPUTER MODEL; FERMENTATION; LACTOBACILLUS RHAMNOSUS; MATHEMATICAL MODEL; METABOLIC FLUX; METABOLIC FLUX ANALYSIS; METABOLIC RATE; METABOLISM; NONHUMAN; REACTION ANALYSIS; STOICHIOMETRY;

ACETOIN; ALGORITHMS; COMPUTER SIMULATION; DIACETYL; ENERGY METABOLISM; GENE EXPRESSION REGULATION, BACTERIAL; GLUCOSE; LACTIC ACID; LACTOBACILLUS; MODELS, BIOLOGICAL; MULTIENZYME COMPLEXES; SIGNAL TRANSDUCTION; SPECIES SPECIFICITY;

LACTOBACILLUS; LACTOBACILLUS RHAMNOSUS;

EID: 10644275010     PISSN: 00063592     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/bit.20273     Document Type: Article

References (17)

1. Adams MR. 1999. Safety of industrial lactic acid bacteria. J Biotechnol 68:171-178.
2. Ben-Israel A. 2002. The Moore of the Moore-Penrose Inverse. J Linear Algebra 9:150-157.
3. Cogan TM, Fitzgerald RJ, Doonan S. 1984. Acetolactate synthase of leuconostoc-lactis and its regulation of acetoin production. J Dairy Res 51:597-604.
4. Cornish-Bowden A, Cárdenas ML. 2001. Information transfer in metabolic pathways - Effects of irreversible steps in computer models. Eur J Biochem 268:6616-6624.
5. Heinrich R, Schuster S. 1996. The regulation of cellular systems. New York: Chapman and Hall. c 3 pp 75-111.
6. Hickey MW, Hillier AJ, Jago GR. 1983. Metabolism of pyruvate and citrate in lactobacilli. Aust J Biol Sci 36:487-496.
7. Klamt S, Schuster S. 2002. Calculating as many fluxes as possible in underdetermined metabolic networks. Molec Biol Rep 29:243-248.
8. Klamt S, Schuster S, Gilles ED. 2002. Calculability analysis in underdetermined metabolic networks illustrated by a model of the central metabolism of in purple nonsulphur metabolism. Biotechnol Bioeng 77:734-750.
9. Lee K, Berthiaume F, Stephanoploulos GN, Yarmush DM, Yarmush ML. 2000. Metabolic flux analysis of posbturn hepatic hyper-metabolism. Metabol Eng 2:312-327.
10. Papin JA, Price ND, Wiback SJ, Fell DA, Palsson BO. 2003. Metabolic pathways in the post-genomic era. Trends Biochem Sci 28:250-258.
11. Penrose R. 1954. A generalized inverse for matrices. Proc Camb Phil Soc 51:406-413.
12. Pfieffer T, Sanchez-Valdenebro I, Nuno JC, Montero F, Schuster S. 1999. Metatool: For studying metabolic networks. Bioinformatics 15:251-257.
13. Rohwer JM, Botha FC. 2001. Analysis of sucrose accumulation in the sugar cane culm on the basis of in vitro kinetic data. Biochem J 358:437-445.
14. Schuster S, Fell DA, Dandekar T. 2000. A general definition of metabolic pathways useful for systematic organization and analysis of complex metabolic networks. Nat Biotechnol 18:326-332.
15. Schuster S, Hilgetag C. 1994. On elementary flux modes in biochemical systems at steady state. J Biol Syst 2:165-182.
16. Schuster S, Klamt S, Weckwerth W, Moldenhauer F, Pfeiffer T. 2002. Use of network analysis of metabolic systems in bioengineering. Bioprocess Biosys Eng 24:363-373.
17. Stephanopoulos GN, Aristidou AA, Nielsen J. 1998. Metabolic engineering principles and methodologies. London: Academic Press. c 8 pp 309-351.