The impact of setup costs, commonality, and capacity on schedule stability: An exploratory study

International Journal of Production Economics

Volumn 95, Issue 1, 2005, Pages 95-107

  Meixell, Mary J ^a  

^a GEORGE MASON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Collaborative supply chains; Production planning; Rolling schedules; Schedule stability; Supply chain management

Indexed keywords

COSTS; FREIGHT TRANSPORTATION; INDUSTRIAL MANAGEMENT; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; PROCESS CONTROL; PRODUCT DESIGN; SCHEDULING; STRATEGIC PLANNING;

COLLABORATIVE SUPPLY CHAINS; PRODUCTION PLANNING; ROLLING SCHEDULES; SCHEDULE STABILITY; SUPPLY CHAIN MANAGEMENT;

JUST IN TIME PRODUCTION;

EID: 10444270256     PISSN: 09255273     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijpe.2003.11.010     Document Type: Article

References (42)

1. Biller, S., Bish, E.K., Muriel, A., 2002. Impact of manufacturing flexibility on supply chain performance in the automotive industry. In: Song, J.-S., Yao, D.D. (Eds.), Supply Chain Structures: Coordination, Information and Optimization. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Norwell, MA, pp. 73-118.
2. Chand, S., Hsu, V.N., Sethi, S., 2002. Forecast, solution and rolling horizon in operations management problems: A classified bibliography. Manufacturing and Service Operations Management 4 (1), 25-43.
3. Chopra, S., Meindl, P., 2001. Supply Chain Management: Strategy, Planning and Operations. Prentice-Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ.
4. DaSilveira, G., Borenstein, D., Fogliatto, F.S., 2001. Mass customization: Literature review and research directions. International Journal of Production Economics 72, 1-13.
5. Davis, T., 1993. Effective supply chain management. Sloan Management Review 34 (4), 35-46.
6. De Kok, A.G., Inderfurth, K., 1997. Nervousness in inventory management: Comparison of basic control rules. European Journal of Operational Research 103, 55-82.
7. Dejonckheere, J., Disney, S.M., Lambrecht, M.R., Towill, D.R., 2003. Measuring and avoiding the bullwhip effect: A control theoretic approach. European Journal of Operational Research 147, 567-590.
8. Dellaert, N., Jeunet, J., 2003. Controlling multi-level production in a rolling-schedule environment. International Journal of Production Economics 85, 113-121.
9. Duray, R., Ward, P.T., Milligan, G.W., Berry, W.L., 2000. Approaches to mass customization: Configurations and empirical validation. Journal of Operations Management 18, 605-625.
10. Grubbstrom, R.W., Tang, O., 2000. Modelling rescheduling activities in a multi-period production-inventory system. International Journal of Production Economics 68, 123-135.
11. Heisig, G., 2001. Comparison of (s, S) and (s, nQ) inventory control rules with respect to planning stability. International Journal of Production Economics 73, 59-82.
12. Hopp, W.J., Spearman, M.L., 1996. Factory Physics. Irwin. McGraw-Hill, Boston, MA.
13. Inman, R.R., Gonsalvez, D.J.A., 1997. The causes of schedule instability in an automotive supply chain. Production and Inventory Management Journal 38 (2), 26-31.
14. Jensen, T., 1993a. Evaluating the impact of operating environmetns on MRP system nervousness. International Journal of Production Economics 27, 40-58.
15. Jensen, T., 1993b. Measuring and improving planning stability of reorder-point lot-sizing policies. International Journal of Production Economics 30-31, 167-178.
16. Jeunet, J., Jonard, N., 2000. Measuring the performance of lotsizing techniques in uncertain environments. Production and Inventory Management Journal 64, 197-208.
17. Johansen, S.G., 1999. Lot sizing for varying degrees of demand uncertainty. International Journal of Production Economics 59, 405-414.
18. Kelle, P., 1999. The effect of (s, S) ordering policy on the supply chain. International Journal of Production Economics 59 (1-3), 113-122.
19. Kilger, C., Schneeweiss, L., 2000. Demand fulfillment and ATP. In: Stadtler, H., Kilger, C. (Eds.), Supply Chain Management and Advanced Planning: Concepts, Models, Software and Case Studies. Springer, New York.
20. Kimms, A., 1998. Stability measures for rolling schedules with applications to capacity expansion planning, master production scheduling, and lot sizing. Omega 26 (3), 355-12366.
21. Lee, H.L., Padmanabhan, V., Whang, S., 1997. Information distortion in a supply chain: the bullwhip effect. Management Science 43, 546-558.
22. Lin, N.-P., Krajewski, L., 1992. A model for master production scheduling in uncertain environments. Decision Sciences 23, 839-861.
23. Meixell, M.J., 1998. Modeling demand behavior in manufacturing supply chains. In: Department of Industrial and Manufacturing Systems Engineering, Lehigh University, Bethlehem, PA, http://www.som.gmu.edu/faculty/profiles/mmeixell.html.
24. Metters, R.D., 1997. Quantifying the bullwhip effect in supply chains. Journal of Operations Management 15 (2), 89-100.
25. Metters, R., Vargas, V., 1999. A comparison of production scheduling policies on costs, service levels and schedule changes. Production and Operations Management 8 (1), 76-91.
26. Orlicky, J., 1975. Material Requirements Planning. McGraw-Hill Book Company, New York.
27. Robertson, D., Ulrich, K., 1998. Planning for product plat-forms. Sloan Management Review 39 (54), 19-31.
28. Rohde, J., 2000. Coordination and integration. In: Stadtler, H., Kilger, C. (Eds.), Supply Chain Management and Advanced Planning: Concepts, Models, Software and Case Studies. Springer, New York.
29. Shapiro, J.F., 1993. Mathematical programming models and methods for production planning and scheduling. In: Zipkin, P.H. (Ed.), Logistics of Production and Inventory. Handbooks in Operations Research and Management Science, Vol. 4. North-Holland, Amsterdam, pp. 371-444.
30. Simpson, N.C., 1999. Multiple level production planning in rolling horizon assembly environments. European Journal of Operational Research 114, 15-28.
31. Sridharan, V., Berry, W.L., 1990. Freezing the master production schedule under demand uncertainty. Decision Sciences 21, 97-120.
32. Sridharan, V., Berry, W.L., Udayabhanu, V., 1987. Freezing the master production schedule under rolling planning horizons. Management Science 33 (9), 1137-1149.
33. Sridharan, V., Berry, W.L., Udayabhanu, V., 1988. Measuring master production schedule stability under rolling planning horizons. Decision Sciences 19, 147-166.
34. Stadtler, H., 2000. Improved rolling schedules for the dynamic single-level lot-sizing problem. Management Science 46 (2), 318-326.
35. Supply Chain Council, 2003. Supply Chain Operations Reference Model, version 6.0, retrieved June 10, 2003. http://www.supply chain.org.
36. Tang, O., Grubbstrom, R.W., 2002. Planning and replanning the master production schedule under demand uncertainty. International Journal of Production Economics 78, 323-334.
37. Tempelmeier, H., Derstroff, M., 1996. A Lagrangean-based heuristic for dynamic multilevel multiitem constrained lotsizing with setup times. Management Science 42, 738-757.
38. van Donselaar, K., van den Nieuwenhof, J., Visschers, J., 2000. The impact of material coordination concepts on planning stability in supply chains. International Journal of Production Economics 68, 169-12176.
39. Wu, S.D., Meixell, M.J., 2004. Demand propagation in ERP integrated assembly supply chains. In: Geunes, J.J., Pardalos, P.M., Romeijn, H.E., Shen, Z.J. (Eds.), Research Frontiers in Supply Chain Management and Electronic Commerce, Applied Optimization Series. Kluwer Academic Press, Dordrecht.
40. Xie, J., Zhao, X., Lee, T.S., 2003. Freezing the master production schedule under single resource constraint and demand uncertainty. International Journal of Production Economics 83 (1), 65-84.
41. Zhao, X., Lam, K., 1997. Lot-sizing rules and freezing the master production schedule in material requirements planning systems. International Journal of Production Economics 53, 281-12305.
42. Zhao, X., Xie, J., Jiang, Q., 2001. Lot-sizing rules and freezing the master production schedule under capacity constraint and demand. Production and Operations Management 10 (1), 45-60.