Antitakeover provisions and shareholder value implications: A review and a contingency framework

Journal of Management

Volumn 26, Issue 5, 2000, Pages 1005-1030

  Sundaramurthy, Chamu ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CINCINNATI   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0038533464     PISSN: 01492063     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/014920630002600501     Document Type: Article

References (120)

1. Agrawal A., Mandelker G.N. Large shareholders and the monitoring of managers The case of antitakeover charter amendments . Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis. 25:1990;143-161.
2. Agrawal A., Mandelker G.N. Shark repellents and the role of institutional investors in corporate governance. Managerial and Decision Economics. 13:1992;15-22.
3. Akhigbe A., Madura J. Impact of anti-takeover amendments on corporate performance. Applied Financial Economics. 6:1996;519-529.
4. Ambrose B.W., Megginson W.L. The role of asset structure, ownership structure, and takeover defenses in determining acquisition likelihood. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis. 27:1992;575-589.
5. Baysinger, B.D., & Butler, H. 1985. Antitakeover amendments, managerial entrenchment, and the contractual theory of the corporation. Virginia Law Review, 71: 8, 1257-1303.
6. Baysinger, B.D., & Hoskisson, R.E. 1990. The composition of boards of directors and strategic control: Effects on corporate strategy. Academy of Management Review, 15: 1, 72-87.
7. Baysinger B.D., Kosnik R.H., Turk T.A. Effects of board and ownership structure on corporate R&D strategy. Academy of Management Journal. 34:1991;205-214.
8. Bebchuk L.A. Toward distorted choice and equal treatment in corporate takeovers. Harvard Law Review. 98:1985;1695-1808.
9. Berkovitch E., Khanna N. How target shareholders benefit from value-reducing defensive strategies in takeovers. Journal of Finance. 45:1990;137-156.
10. Berle A., Means G. The Modern Corporation and Private Property. 1932;Macmillan, New York.
11. Bethel, J.E., & Liebeskind, J. 1993. The effects of ownership structure on corporate restructuring. Strategic Management Journal, 14 (Summer): 51-68.
12. Bhagat S., Brickley J.A. Cumulative voting The value of minority shareholder voting rights . Journal of Law and Economics. 27:1984;339-365.
13. Bhagat S., Jefferis R.H. Voting power in the proxy process The case of antitakeover charter amendments . Journal of Financial Economics. 30:1991;193-225.
14. Blair, M. 1995. Ownership and Control: Rethinking corporate governance for the twenty-first century. Washington D. C. The Brookings Institution.
15. Born J.A., Trahan E.A., Faria H.J. Golden parachutes Incentive aligners, management entrenchers, or takeover bid signals? The Journal of Financial Research. 16:(4):1993;299-308.
16. Borokhovich K.A., Brunarski K.R., Parrino R. CEO contracting and antitakeover amendments. The Journal of Finance. LII, 4:1997;1495-1517.
17. Brancato C.K. Institutional Investors and Corporate Governance; Best Practices for Increasing Corporate Value. 1997;Irwin, Chicago.
18. Brickley J.A., Coles J.L., Terry R.L. Outside directors and the adoption of poison pills. Journal of Financial Economics. 35:1994;371-390.
19. Brickley J.A., Lease R.C., Smith C.W. Ownership structure and voting on antitakeover amendments. Journal of Financial Economics. 20:1988;267-291.
20. Brickley J.A., Lease R.C., Smith C.W. Corporate voting Evidence from charter amendment proposals . Journal of Corporate Finance. 1:1994;5-31.
21. Brickley, P. 1998. Firm spices up its poison pill. Philadelphia Business Journal. March, 13: 17 (5), 5.
22. Brown S., Warner J. Using daily stock returns The case of event studies . Journal of Financial Economics. 14:1985;3-31.
23. Buchholtz A.K., Ribbens B.A. Role of chief executive officers in takeover resistance Effects of CEO incentives and individual characteristics . Academy of Management Journal. 37:(3):1994;554-579.
24. Byrd J.W., Hickman J.A. Do outside directors monitor managers? Evidence from tender offer bids. Journal of Financial Economics. 32:1992;195-221.
25. Byrne, J. 1999. The Teddy Roosevelts of corporate governance in urging reform. TIAA-CREF speaks softly and carries a big stick. Business Week, April, 31: 75.
26. Bizjak, J.M. Marquette, C.J. 1998. Are shareholder proposals all bark and no bit? Evidence from shareholder resolutions to rescind poison pills. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 33(4): 499-502.
27. Cannella A.A., Lubatkin M. Succession as a sociopolitical process Internal impediments to outsider selection . Academy of Management Journal. 36:(4):1993;763-793.
28. Chaganti R., Damanpour F. Institutional ownership, capital structure, and firm performance. Strategic Management Journal. 12:1991;479-491.
29. Choi D., Kamma S., Weintrop J. The Delaware courts, poison pills, and shareholder wealth. Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization. 5:1989;375-393.
30. Cochran P.L., Wood R.A., Jones T.B. The composition of boards of directors and the incidence of golden parachutes. Academy of Management Journal. 28:1985;664-671.
31. Comment R., Schwert G.W. Poison or placebo? Evidence on the deterrence and wealth effects of modern antitakeover measures. Journal of Financial Economics. 39:1995;3-43.
32. Cornett M.M., Vetsuypens M.R. Voting rights and shareholder wealth The issuance of limited voting common stock . Managerial and Decision Economics. 10:1989;175-188.
33. Cotter J.F., Shivdasani A., Zenner M. Do independent directors enhance target shareholder wealth during tender offers? Journal of Financial Economics. 43:(2):1997;195-218.
34. Danielson M., Karpoff J. On the uses of corporate governance provisions. Journal of Corporate Finance. 4:1998;347-371.
35. Datta S., Iskander-Datta M. Takeover defenses and wealth effects on security holders The case of poison pill adoptions . Journal of Banking and Finance. 20:1996;1231-1250.
36. Davis G.F. Agents without principles? The spread of the poison pill through the intercorporate network. Administrative Science Quarterly. 36:1991;583-613.
37. DeAngelo H., DeAngelo L. Managerial ownership of voting rights A study of public corporations with dual classes of common stock . Journal of Finance. 33:1985;70.
38. DeAngelo H., Rice E.M. Antitakeover charter amendments and stockholder wealth. Journal of Financial Economics. 11:1983;329-360.
39. Easterbrook, F.H., & Fischel, D.R. 204., 1981. The proper role of target's management in responding to a tender offer. Harvard Law Review, 94, 1161-1204.
40. Eisenhardt K.M. Agency theory An assessment and review . Academy of Management Review. 14:1989;57-74.
41. Fama, E.F. 1980. Agency problems and the theory of the firm. Journal of Political Economy, 88: 21, 288-307.
42. Fama, E.F., & Jensen, M.C. 1983. Separation of ownership from control. Journal of Law and Economics, 26: 301-325.
43. Finkelstein S. Power in top management teams Dimensions, measurement, and validation . Academy of Management Journal. 35:1992;5050-5138.
44. Finkelstein S., D'Aveni R.A. CEO duality as a double-edged sword How boards of directors balance entrenchment avoidance and unity of command . Academy of Management Journal. 37:1994;1079-1108.
45. Finkelstein, S., & Hambrick, D. 1996. Strategic Leadership: Top executives and Their Effects on Organizations. West Publishing Company.
46. Gilson R.J. The case against shark repellent amendments Structural limitations of the enabling concept . Stanford Law Review. 34:1982;775-836.
47. Grossman S., Hart O. Takeover bids, the free-rider problem, and the theory of the corporation. Bell Journal of Economics. 11:1980;42-64.
48. Hill C.W.L., Snell S.A. External control, corporate strategy, and firm performance in research-intensive industries. Strategic Management Journal. 9:1988;579-590.
49. Hill C.W.L., Snell S.A. Effects of ownership structure and control on corporate productivity. Academy of Management Journal. 32:1989;25-46.
50. Hanson R.C., Song M.H. Managerial ownership change and firm value Evidence from dual-class recapitalizations and insider trading . The Journal of Financial Research. 18:(3):1995;281-297.
51. Harris E. Antitakeover measures, golden parachutes, and target firm shareholder interests. Rand Journal of Economics. 21:1990;614-625.
52. Harrison, J.R. Torres, D.L., & Kukalis, S. 1988. The changing of the guard: Turnover and structural change in the top-management positions. Administrative Science Quarterly, 33: 211-232.
53. Hitt M.A., Hoskisson R.E., Johnson R.A., Moesel D.D. The market for corporate control and firm innovation. Academy of Management Journal. 39:(5):1996;1084-1119.
54. Hitt M.A., Hoskisson R.E., Ireland R.D., Harrison J.S. Are acquisitions a poison pill for innovation? Academy of Management Executive. 5:(4):1991;22-34.
55. Hitt M.A., Hoskisson R.E., Ireland R.D., Harrison J.S. The effects of acquisitions on R&D inputs and outputs. Academy of Management Journal. 34:1991;693-706.
56. Hoskisson R.E., Johnson R.A. Corporate restructuring and strategic change The effect on strategy and R&D intensity . Strategic Management Journal. 14:1992;215-235.
57. Jennings, R., & Mazzeo, M. 1986. Resisting takeovers isn't always bad. Business Horizons, March-April, 56: 60.
58. Jarrell G.A., Poulsen A.B. Shark repellents and stock prices The effects of antitakeover amendments since 1980 . Journal of Financial Economics. 19:1987;127-168.
59. Jarrell G.A., Poulsen A.B. Dual-class recapitalizations as antitakeover mechanisms The recent evidence . Journal of Financial Economics. 20:1988;129-152.
60. Jensen M., Meckling W. Theory of the firm Managerial behavior, agency costs, and ownership structure . Journal of Financial Economics. 3:1976;305-360.
61. Johnson J.L., Daily C.M., Ellstrand A.E. Boards of directors A review and research agenda . Journal of Management. 22:(3):1996;409-438.
62. Johnson M.S., Rao R. The impact of antitakeover amendments on corporate financial performance. The Financial Review. 32:(4):1997;659-691.
63. Johnson M.S., Rao R. Does antitakeover protection reduce myopic managerial investment behavior? Journal of Managerial Issues. 9:(4):1997;497-511.
64. Kesner, I.F., & Dalton, D.R. 1985. Antitakeover tactics: Management 42. Stockholders, 0. Business Horizons, 17-25.
65. Knoeber C.R. Golden parachutes, shark repellents, and hostile takeovers. American Economic Review. 76:1986;155-167.
66. Kosnik R. Effects of board demography and directors' incentive on corporate greenmail decisions. Academy of Management Journal. 33:1990;129-150.
67. Lambert R.A., Larcker D.F. Golden parachutes, executive decision making, and shareholder wealth. Journal of Accounting and Economics. 7:1985;179-203.
68. Lauterbach B., Malitz I.B., Vu J. Takeover threats, antitakeover amendments and stock price reaction. Managerial and Decision Economics. 12:1991;499-510.
69. Lee, C.I., Rosenstein, S., Rangan, N., & Davidson, III., W.N. 1992. Board composition and shareholder wealth: The case of management buyouts. Financial Management, 21: 58-72.
70. Lindeman, T. 1999. Big investor pressures Mylan to drop dead-hand protections. Pittsburgh Post-Gazette, June, 16, C-1.
71. Linn S.C., McConnell J.J. An empirical investigation of the impact of 'antitakeover' amendments on common stock prices. Journal of Financial Economics. 11:1983;361-399.
72. Lipin S. U.S. firms find new ways to fight hostile takeovers. The Wall Street Journal Europe. March, 11:1998;4.
73. Lorsch, J.W., & MacIver, E. 1989. Pawns and potentates: The reality of corporate boards. Harvard Business School. Massachusetts.
74. Mahoney, J.M., & Mahoney, J.T. 1993. An empirical investigation of the effect of corporate charter antitakeover amendments on stockholder wealth. Strategic Management Journal, 14, 17-31.
75. Mahoney J.M., Sundaramurthy C., Mahoney J.T. The differential impact on stockholder wealth of various antitakeover provisions. Managerial and Decision Economics. 17:1996;531-549.
76. Mahoney J.M., Sundaramurthy C., Mahoney J.T. An empirical investigation of the effects of corporate antitakeover provisions on long-term investment. Managerial and Decision Economics. 18:1997;349-365.
77. Malatesta P.H., Walkling R.A. Poison pill securities Stockholder wealth, profitability, and ownership structure . Journal of Financial Economics. 20:1988;347-376.
78. Mallette P. Antitakeover charter amendments Impact on determinants of future competitive position . Journal of Management. 17:1991;769-786.
79. Mallette P., Fowler K.L. Effects of board composition and stock ownership on the adoption of 'poison pills'. Academy of Management Journal. 35:1992;1010-1035.
80. Manne H. Mergers and the market for corporate control. Journal of Political Economy. 73:1965;110-120.
81. McCoy, M. 1999. Lubrizol challenged over its poison pill. Chemical and Engineering News, 77: 13, 7-8.
82. Markides C. How much-hated defenses can unlock hidden value. Multinational Business. 3:1992;21-28.
83. McWilliams V.B. Managerial share ownership and the stock price effects of antitakeover amendment proposals. Journal of Finance. 45:1990;1627-1640.
84. McWilliams V.B., Sen N. Board monitoring and antitakeover amendments. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis. 32:(4):1997;491-505.
85. Mergers and Acquisitions. 1996. Smaller firms opt for pill protection., 30(4): 11.
86. Meulbroek L.K., Mitchell M.L., Mulherin J.H., Netter J.M., Poulsen A.B. Shark repellents and managerial myopia An empirical test . Journal of Political Economy. 98:1990;1108-1117.
87. Moerland P.W. Alternative disciplinary mechanisms in different corporate systems. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization. 26:1995;17-34.
88. Mogavero D.J., Toyne M.F. The impact of golden parachutes on Fortune 500 stock returns A reexamination of the evidence . Quarterly Journal of Business and Economics. 34:(4):1995;30-38.
89. Myers R. Pretty poison Antitakeover defenses regain their dangerous allure . CFO. 12:(3):1996;43-46.
90. Norton L. Expiration date If this stock market falters, poison pills could become a hot topic again . Barrons. June, 7:1998;17.
91. Parker, H. 1994. The chairman/CEO separation: View one. Directors and Boards, Spring, 44.
92. Partch M. The creation of a class of limited voting common stock and shareholders' wealth. Journal of Financial Economics. 18:1987;313-339.
93. Pettigrew A., McNulty T. Power and influence in and around the boardroom. Human Relations. 48:(8):1995;845-873.
94. Pound J. The effect of antitakeover amendments on takeover activity Some direct evidence . Journal of Law and Economics. 30:1987;353-368.
95. Pound, J. 1993. The rise of the political model of corporate governance and corporate control. New York University Law Review, 68, 1003-1071.
96. Pugh W.N., Page D.E., Jahera J.S. Antitakeover charter amendments Effects on corporate decisions . Journal of Financial Research. 15:1992;57-67.
97. Rechner P., Dalton D. CEO duality and organizational performance A longitudinal analysis . Strategic Management Journal. 12:1991;155-160.
98. Rouffignac, A. 1998. Trico adopts poison pill to avert possible takeover attempt. Houston Business Journal, February, 27: 27,41, 7.
99. Ryngaert M. The effect of poison pill securities on shareholder wealth. Journal of Financial Economics. 20:1988;377-417.
100. Scherer F. Corporate takeovers The efficiency arguments . Journal of Economic Perspectives. 2:1988;69-82.
101. Shleifer A., Vishny R.A. Large shareholders and corporate control. Journal of Political Economy. 94:1986;461-488.
102. Singh H., Harianto F. Management-board relationships, takeover risk and the adoption of golden parachutes. Academy of Management Journal. 32:1989;7-24.
103. Singh, H., & Harianto, F. 1989. Top management tenure, corporate ownership structure and the magnitude of golden parachutes. Strategic Management Journal, 10 (Summer): 143-156.
104. Stein J.C. Takeover threats and managerial myopia. Journal of Political Economy. 96:1988;61-80.
105. Stulz R. Managerial control of voting rights Financing policies and the market for corporate control . Journal of Financial Economics. 20:1988;25-54.
106. Sundaramurthy C. Corporate governance within the context of antitakeover provisions. Strategic Management Journal. 17:1996;377-394.
107. Sundaramurthy C., Mahoney J.M., Mahoney J.T. Board structure, antitakeover provisions, and stockholder wealth. Strategic Management Journal. 18:1997;231-245.
108. Sundaramurthy C., Rechner P., Wang W. The impact of board attributes and stock ownership on the adoption of classified board provisions. Journal of Management. 22:1996;783-799.
109. Thompson J.D. Organizations in Action. 1967;McGraw-Hill, New York.
110. Thosar S. Tender offers and target management responses managerial entrenchment versus stockholder interest revisited . The Financial Review. 31:(1):1996;87-104.
111. Turk T.A. Takeover resistance, information leakage, and target firm value. Journal of Management. 18:(3):1992;503-522.
112. Wade J., O'Reilly C.A., Chandratat I. Golden parachutes CEOs and the exercise of social influence . Administrative Science Quarterly. 35:1990;587-603.
113. Walkling R.A., Long M.S. Agency theory, managerial welfare and takeover bid resistance. Rand Journal of Economics. 15:1984;54-68.
114. Walsh, J.P., & Kosnik, R. 1993. Corporate raiders and their disciplinary role in the market for corporate control. Academy of Management Journal, 36: 4, 671-700.
115. Walsh J.P., Seward J.K. On the efficiency of internal and external corporate control mechanisms. Academy of Management Review. 15:1990;421-458.
116. Westphal J.D., Zajac E.J. Who shall govern? CEO/board power, demographic similarity, and new director selection. Administrative Science Quarterly. 43:1995;127-153.
117. Williamson O.E. Markets and Hierarchies Analysis and Antitrust Implications . 1975;Free Press, New York.
118. Wirth G. Dusting off the defense arsenal. CFO. 12:(1):1996;12.
119. Zahra S.A., Pearce J.A. Board of directors and corporate financial performance A review and integrative model . Journal of Management. 15:1989;291-334.
120. Zald M.N. The power and functions of boards of directors. American Journal of Sociology. 5:1969;97-111.