The limitations of ontogenetic data in phylogenetic analyses

Contributions to Zoology

Volumn 71, Issue 1-3, 2002, Pages 47-65

  Koenemann, Stefan ^a   Schram, Frederick R ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF AMSTERDAM   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Event pairs; Heterochrony; Neighbor joining; Ontogeny; Parsimony; Phylogenetic methodology; Sequence data; Vertebrate development

Indexed keywords

VERTEBRATA;

EID: 0036986267     PISSN: 00678546     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1163/18759866-0710103005     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. Alberch P. 1985. Problems with the interpretation of developmental sequences. Syst. Zool. 34: 46-58.
2. Akam M. 1995. Hox genes and the evolution of diverse body plans. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B 349: 313-319.
3. Browne WE, Patel NH. 2000. Molecular genetics of crustacean feeding appendage development and diversification. Seminars in Cell and Developmental Biology 11: 427-435.
4. Damen WD, Hausdorf M, Seyfarth E-A, Tautz D. 1998. A conserved mode of head segmentation in arthropods revealed by the expression pattern of Hox genes in spider. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. USA 95: 10665-10670.
5. Guralnick RP, Lindberg DR. 2001. Reconnecting cell and animal lineages: what do cell lineages tell us about the evolution and development of Spiralia. Evolution 55: 1501-1519.
6. Jeffrey JE, Bininda-Emonds ORP, Coates MI, Richardson MK. 2002a. Analyzing evolutionary patterns in amniote embryonic development. Evol. Development 4: 292-302.
7. Jeffrey JE, Richardson MK, Coates MI, Bininda-Emonds ORP. 2002b. Analyzing developmental sequences within a phylogenetic framework. Syst. Biol. 51: 478-491.
8. Klompen JSH, O'Connor BM. 1989. Ontogenetic patterns and phylogenetic analysis in Acari. In: André HM and Lions J-C, eds. The concept of stase and the ontogeny of arthropods. AGAR Publishers, Wavre, Belgium: 91-103.
9. Mabee PM, Humphries J. 1993. Coding polymorphic data: examples from allozymes and ontogeny. Syst. Biol. 42: 166-181.
10. Mabee PM, Trendler TA. 1996. Development of the cranium and paired fins in Betta splendens (Teleostei: Percomorpha): intraspecific variation and interspecific comparisons. J. Morph. 227: 249-287.
11. Nunn CL, Smith KK. 1998. Statistical analyses of developmental sequences: The craniofacial region in marsupial and placental mammals. Amer. Nat. 152: 82-101.
12. Schlosser G. 2001. Using heterochrony plots to detect the dissociated coevolution of characters. J. Exp. Zool. (Mol.Dev. Evol.) 291: 282-304.
13. Schram FR, Koenemann S. 2001. Developmental genetics and arthropod evolution: part I, on legs. Evol. Development 3: 343-354.
14. Smith KK. 1996. Integration of craniofacial structures during development in mammals. Am. Zool. 36: 70-79.
15. Smith KK. 1997. Comparative patterns of craniofacial development in eutherian and metatherian mammals. Evolution 51: 1663-1678.
16. Smith KK. 2001. Heterochrony revisited: the evolution of developmental sequences. Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 73: 169-186.
17. Telford MJ, Thomas RH. 1998. Expression of homeobox genes shows chelicerate arthropods retain their deutocerebral segment. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. USA 95: 10671-10675.
18. Velhagen WA. 1997. Analyzing developmental sequences using sequence units. Syst. Biol. 46: 204-210.
19. Wheeler QD. 1990. Ontogeny and character phylogeny. Cladistics 6: 225-268.