Two-stage sampling designs for gene association studies

Genetic Epidemiology

Volumn 27, Issue 4, 2004, Pages 401-414

  Thomas, Duncan ^a   Xie, Rongrong ^a   Gebregziabher, Mulugeta ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

Gene association studies; Single nucleotide polymorphisms; Tag SNPs; Two stage designs

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CASE CONTROL STUDY; COST EFFECTIVENESS ANALYSIS; GENE LINKAGE DISEQUILIBRIUM; GENETIC ASSOCIATION; GENETIC RISK; GENOTYPE; HAPLOTYPE; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; RESTRICTION MAPPING; RISK ASSESSMENT; SAMPLING; SINGLE NUCLEOTIDE POLYMORPHISM;

CASE-CONTROL STUDIES; CHROMOSOME MAPPING; GENETIC PREDISPOSITION TO DISEASE; GENETICS, POPULATION; GENOME, HUMAN; GENOTYPE; HAPLOTYPES; HUMANS; LINKAGE DISEQUILIBRIUM; MODELS, GENETIC; POLYMORPHISM, SINGLE NUCLEOTIDE; RESEARCH DESIGN;

EID: 10044277900     PISSN: 07410395     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/gepi.20047     Document Type: Article

References (46)

1. Bernstein JL, Langholz B, Haile RW, et al. 2004. Study design. Evaluating gene-environment interactions in the etiology of breast cancer: the WECARE study. Breast Cancer Res 6:R199-214.
2. Breslow NE, Chatterjee N. 1999. Design and analysis of two-phase studies with binary outcome applied to Wilms tumor prognosis. Appl Statist 48:457-468.
3. Brown D, Gorin M, Weeks D. 1994. Efficient strategies for genomic searching using the affected-pedigree-member method of linkage analysis. Am J Hum Genet 54:544-552.
4. Carlson CS, Eberle MA, Rieder MJ, Yi Q, Kruglyak L, Nickerson DA. 2004. Selecting a maximally informative set of single-nucleotide polymorphisms for association analyses using linkage disequilibrium. Am J Hum Genet 74:106-120.
5. Carroll RJ, Ruppert D, Stefanski LA. 1995. Measurement error in nonlinear models. London: Chapman and Hall.
6. Chapman JM, Cooper JD, Todd JA, Clayton DG. 2003. Detecting disease associations due to linkage disequilibrium using haplotype tags: a class of tests and the determinants of statistical power. Hum Hered 56:18-31.
7. Chiano M, Clayton D. 1998. Fine genetic mapping using haplotype analysis and the missing data problem. Ann Hum Genet 62:55-60.
8. Conti D, Gauderman W. 2004. SNPs, haplotypes, and model selection in a candidate gene region: The SIMPLe analysis of multilocus data. Genet Epidemiol 27:429-441 (this issue).
9. Cousin E, Genin E, Mace S, Ricards S, Chansac C, del Zompo M, Deleuze JF. 2003. Association studies in candidate genes: strategies to select SNPs to be tested. Hum Hered 56:151-159.
10. Douglas JA, Boehnke M, Gillanders E, Trent JM, Gruber SB. 2001. Experimentally-derived haplotypes substantially increase the efficiency of linkage disequilibrium studies. Nature Genet 28:361-364.
11. Elston RC, Guo X, Williams LV. 1996. Two-stage global search designs for linkage analysis using pairs of affected relatives. Genet Epidemiol 13:535-558.
12. Epstein MP, Satten GA. 2003. Inference on haplotype effects in case-control studies using unphased genotype data. Am J Hum Genet 73:1316-1329.
13. Fuller W. 1987. Measurement error models. New York: Wiley.
14. Gibbs RA, Belmont JW, Hardenbol P, et al. 2003. The International HapMap Project. Nature 426:789-796.
15. Haile R, Siegmund K, Gauderman W, Thomas D. 1999. Study design issues in the development of the University of Southern California consortium's colorectal cancer registry. Monogr Natl Cancer Inst 26:89-93.
16. Haiman CA, Stram DO, Pike MC, Kolonel LN, Burtt NP, Altshuler D, Hirschorn J, Henderson BE. 2003. A comprehensive haplotype analysis of CYP19 and breast cancer risk: the Multiethnic Cohort. Hum Mol Genet 12:2679-2692.
17. Holmans P, Craddock N. 1997. Efficient strategies for genome scanning using maximum-likelihood affected-sib-pair analysis. Am J Hum Genet 60:657-666.
18. Horne BD, Camp NJ. 2004. Principal component analysis for selection of optimal SNP-sets that capture intragenic genetic variation. Genetic Epidemiol 26 (Suppl):11-21.
19. Hudson RR. 2002. Generating samples under a Wright-Fisher neutral model of genetic variation. Bioinformatics 18:337-338.
20. Johnson GC, Esposito L, Barratt BJ, et al. 2001. Haplotype tagging for the identification of common disease genes. Nature Genet 29:233-237.
21. Kolonel L, Henderson B, Hankin J, et al. 2000. A multiethnic cohort in Hawaii and Los Angeles: baseline characteristics. Am J Epidemiol 151:346-357.
22. Kraft P, Thomas DC. 2000. Bias and efficiency in family-matched gene-characterization studies: conditional, prospective, retrospective, and joint likelihoods. Am J Hum Genet 66:1119-1131.
23. Meng Z, Zaykin DV, Xu CF, Wagner M, Ehm MG. 2003. Selection of genetic markers for association analyses, using linkage disequilibrium and haplotypes. Am J Hum Genet 73:115-130.
24. Moore DS. 1977. Generalized inverses, Wald's method and the construction of chi squared tests of fit. JASA 72:131-137.
25. Pepe MS, Flemming TR. 1991. A nonparametric method for dealing with mismeasured covariate data. JASA 86:108-113.
26. Satagopan JM, Elston RC. 2003. Optimal two-stage genotyping in population-based association studies. Genet Epidemiol 25:149-157.
27. Satagopan JM, Venkatraman ES, Begg CB. 2004. Two-stage designs for gene-disease association studies with sample size constraints. Biometrics 60:589-597.
28. Satten G, Kupper L. 1993. Inferences about exposures-disease associations using probabiliry-of-exposure information. JASA 88:200-208.
29. Schaid DJ, Rowland CM, Tines DE, Jacobson RM, Poland GA. 2002. Score tests for association between traits and haplotypes when linkage phase is ambiguous. Am J Hum Genet 70:425-434.
30. Sham P. 1994. Sequential analysis and case-control candidate gene association studies: reply to Sobell et al. Am J Med Genet 54:154-157.
31. Siegmund KD, Whittemore AS, Thomas DC. 1999. Multistage sampling for disease family registries. Monogr Natl Cancer Inst 26:43-48.
32. Sobell JL, Heston LL, Sommer SS. 1993. Novel association approach for determining the genetic predisposition to schizophrenia: case-control resource and testing of a candidate gene. Am J Med Genet 48:28-35.
33. Spiegelman D, Gray R. 1991. Cost-efficient study designs for binary response data with Gaussian covariate measurement error [erratum appears in Biometrics 1991 Dec;47(4):1641]. Biometrics 47:851-869.
34. Stram D, Longnecker M, Shames L, Kolonel LN, Henderson BE, Pike MC. 1995. Cost-efficient design of a diet validation study. Am J Epidemiol 142:353-362.
35. Stram DO, Haiman CA, Hirschhorn JN, Altshuler D, Kolonel LN, Henderson BE, Thomas DC. 2003a. Choosing haplotype-tagging SNPS based on unphased genotype data using a preliminary sample of unrelated subjects with an example from the Multiethnic Cohort Study. Hum Hered 55:27-36.
36. Stram DO, Pearce CL, Bretsky P, et al. 2003b. Modeling and E-M estimation of haplotype-specific relative risks from genotype data for a case-control study of unrelated individuals. Hum Hered 55:179-190.
37. Stram DO. 2004. Tag SNP selection for association studies. Genet Epidemiol 27:365-374 (this issue).
38. Thomas DC, Stram D, Dwyer J. 1993. Exposure measurement error: Influence on exposure-disease relationships and methods of correction. Ann Rev Publ Health 14:69-93.
39. Thomas DC, Stram DO, Conti D, Molitor J, Marjoram P. 2003. Bayesian spatial modeling of haplotype associations. Hum Hered 56:32-40.
40. Thompson D, Stram D, Goldgar D, Witte JS. 2003. Haplotype tagging single nucleotide polymorphisms and association studies. Hum Hered 56:48-55.
41. Weale ME, Depondt C, Macdonald SJ, Smith A, Lai PS, Shorvon SD, Wood NW, Goldstein DB. 2003. Selection and evaluation of tagging SNPs in the neuronal-sodium-channel gene SCN1A: implications for linkage-disequilibrium gene mapping. Am J Hum Genet 73:551-565.
42. Whittemore AS, Halpern J. 1997. Multi-stage sampling in genetic epidemiology. Stat Med 16:153-167.
43. Whittemore AS, Halpern J. 2003. Logistic regression of family data from retrospective study designs. Genet Epidemiol 25:177-189.
44. Zaykin DV, Westfall PH, Young SS, Karnoub MA, Wagner MJ, Ehm MG. 2002. Testing association of statistically inferred haplotypes with discrete and continuous traits in samples of unrelated individuals. Hum Hered 53:79-91.
45. Zhang K, Deng M, Chen T, Waterman MS, Sun F. 2002. A dynamic programming algorithm for haplotype block partitioning. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 99:7335-7339.
46. Zhang K, Qin ZS, Liu JS, Chen T, Waterman MS, Sun F. 2004. Haplotype block partitioning and tag SNP selection using genotype data and their applications to association studies. Genome Res 14:908-916.