Balancing performance, accountability and equity in stakeholder relationships: Towards more socially responsible HR practice

Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management

Volumn 10, Issue 3, 2003, Pages 129-140

  Simmons, John ^a  

^a LIVERPOOL JOHN MOORES UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0842302360     PISSN: 15353958     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/csr.40     Document Type: Article

References (57)

1. Ahmed S. 1999. The emerging measure of effectiveness for human resource management. Journal of Management Development 18(6): 543-556.
2. Andrews MC, Kacmar KM. 2001. Discriminating amongst organisational politics, justice and support. Journal of Organisational Behavior 18(6): 347-366.
3. Armstrong M, Baron A. 2000. Performance Management - the New Realities. CIPD: London.
4. Banville C, Landry M, Martel J-M, Boulaire C. 1998. A stakeholder approach to MCDA. Systems Research and Behavioral Science 15: 15-32.
5. Barrett E. 1999. Justice in the workplace? Normative ethics and the critique of human resource management. Personnel Review 28(4): 307-318.
6. Bathmaker S. 1999. So what's the deal? The state of the psychological contract in a 'new' university. Journal of Education and Training 51(2): 265-281.
7. Bowles ML, Coates G. 1993. Image and substance: the management of performance as rhetoric or reality. Personnel Review 22(2): 3-21.
8. Burgoyne J. 1995. Stakeholder analysis. In Qualitative Research Methods in Organisational Research, Cassell C, Symon G (eds). Sage: London; 167-187.
9. Carey LE. 1999. Ethical dimensions of a strategic approach to HRM: an Australian perspective. Asia Pacific Journal of Human Resources 37(3): 53-68.
10. Coyle-Shapiro J, Kessler I. 2000. Consequences of the psychological contract for the employment relationship: a large-scale survey. Journal of Management Studies 37 (7): 903-930.
11. Donaldson T. 1999. Making stakeholder theory whole. Academy of Management Review 1(99): 237-241.
12. Donaldson T, Preston LE. 1995. The stakeholder theory of the corporation: concepts, evidence and implications. Academy of Management Review 20(1): 65-91.
13. Dulebohn JH, Ferris GR. 1999. The role of influence tactics in perceptions of performance evaluation fairness. Academy of Management Journal 42(3): 288-303.
14. Erdogan B, Kraimer ML, Liden RC. 2001. Procedural justice as a two dimensional construct. Journal of Applied Behavioral Science 37(2): 205-222.
15. Fisher CM. 1994. The differences between appraisal schemes: variation and acceptability - part I. Personnel Review 24(1): 54-66.
16. Flint DH. 1999. The role of procedural justice in multisource performance appraisal: theory based applications and directions for research. Human Resource Management Review 9(1): 1-20
17. Freeman RE. 1984. Strategic Management: a Stakeholder Approach. Pitman: London.
18. Friedman AI, Miles S. 2001. Developing stakeholder theory. Journal of Management Studies 39(1): 1-21.
19. Frooman J. 1999. Stakeholder influence strategies. Academy of Management Review 24(2): 191-205.
20. Greenwood MR. 2002. Ethics and HRM: a review and conceptual analysis. Journal of Business Ethics 36: 261-278.
21. Greller MM. 1998. Participation in the performance appraisal review: inflexible manager behaviour and variable worker needs. Human Relations 51(8): 1061-1083.
22. Guest DE, Conway N. 2001. Employer Perceptions of the Psychological Contract. CIPD: London.
23. Haberberg A, Rieple A. 2001. The Strategic Management of Organisations. Prentice-Hall: Harlow.
24. Harris L. 2000. Procedural justice and perceptions of fairness in selection practice. International Journal of Selection and Assessment 8(3): 148-157.
25. Harrison IH. 1994. Diagnosing Organizations: Methods, Models and Processes, 2nd edn. Sage: Thousand Oaks, CA.
26. Hart TJ. 1993. Human resource management: time to exercise the militant tendency. Employee Relations 15(3): 29-36.
27. Hendry C. 1995. Human Resource Management. Butterworth-Heinemann: Oxford.
28. Hendry C, Woodward S, Bradley P. 2000. Performance and rewards: cleaning out the stables. Human Resource Management Journal 10(3): 46-61.
29. Kaplan RS, Norton DP. 1992. The balanced scorecard: measures that drive performance. Harvard Business Review 69(1): 71-79.
30. Lemons MA, Jones CA. 2000. Procedural justice in promotion decisions: using perceptions of fairness to build employee commitment. Journal of Managerial Psychology 16(4): 268-280.
31. Marchington M, Wilkinson A, Ackers P, Dundon T. 2001. Management Choice and Employee Voice, People and Work Research Report, Chartered Institute of Personnel and Development.
32. Martin G. 1994. Performance related pay in nursing. Health Manpower Journal 20(5): 10-17.
33. McDonald G, Nijhof A. 1999. Beyond codes of ethics: an integrated framework for stimulating morally responsible behaviour in organisations. Leadership and Organisation Development Journal 20(3): 133-147.
34. Middlewood D, Cardno C (eds). 2001. Managing Teacher Appraisal and Performance. Routledge Falmer: London.
35. Mitchell RK, Agle BR, Wood D. 1997. Towards a theory of stakeholder identification and salience: defining the principle of who and what really counts Academy of Management Review 22(4): 853-886.
36. Newell H, Scarborough H. 2002. HRM in Context - a Case Study Approach. Palgrave: Basingstoke.
37. Newton T, Findlay P. 1996. Playing God: the performance of appraisal. Human Resource Management Journal 6(3): 42-56.
38. Patterson MG, West MA, Lawthom R, Nickell L. 1997. The impact of people management practices on business performance. Issues in People Management 22, Institute of Personnel Management.
39. Pettijohn LS, Parker S, Pettijohn CE, Kent JL. 2001. Performance appraisals: usage, criteria and observations. Journal of Management Development 20(9): 754-771.
40. Randle K. 1997. Rewarding failure: operating a performance related pay system in pharmaceutical research. Personnel Review 26(3): 187-200.
41. Redman T, Snape E, Thompson D, Ka-Ching Yan F. 2000. Performance appraisal in a NHS hospital. Human Resource Management Journal 10(1): 48-62.
42. Simmons JA. 2002. Learning the lessons of history? Expert witness contributions to the future of performance appraisal in UK universities. Employee Relations Review 20: 10-17.
43. Simmons JA, Iles P. 2001. Performance appraisal in knowledge based organisations: implications for management education. International Journal of Management Education 2(1): 3-18.
44. Simmons JA, Iles P, Yolles M. 2002. Identifying those on board 'the moving train': towards a stakeholder-focused methodology for organisational decision making. Conference of the International Society for the Systems Sciences, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, 2002.
45. Solomon E. 2001. The dynamics of corporate change: management's evaluation of stakeholder characteristics. Human Systems Management 20: 257-265.
46. Stiles P, Gratton L, Truss C. 1997. Performance management and the psychological contract. Human Resource Management Journal 7(1): 57-66.
47. Stoney C, Winstanley D. 2001. Stakeholding: confusion or utopia: mapping the conceptual terrain. Journal of Management Studies 38(5): 603-626.
48. Storey J (ed.). 1989. New Perspectives on Human Resource Management. Routledge and Kegan Paul: London.
49. Thorpe R, Homan G. 2000. Strategic Reward Systems. Prentice-Hall: London.
50. Townley B. 1990. The politics of appraisal: lessons of the introduction of appraisal into UK universities. Human Resource Management Journal 1(2): 27-44.
51. Trezise KE. 1996. An introduction to business ethics for human resource management teaching and research. Personnel Review 25 (6): 85-89.
52. Weiss JW. 1998. Business Ethics: a Stakeholder and Issues Management Approach. Dryden: Fort Worth, TX.
53. Williams RS. 2002. Managing Employee Performance. Thomson: London.
54. Wilson I. 2000. The new rules: ethics, social responsibility and strategy. Strategy and Leadership 20(3): 12-16.
55. Winstanley D, Stuart-Smith K. 1996. Policing performance: the ethics of performance management Personnel Review 25(6): 66-83.
56. Winstanley D, Woodall J, Heery E. 1996. Business ethics and human resource management. Personnel Review 25(6): 5-12.
57. Woodd M. 1997. Human resource specialists - guardians of ethical conduct? Journal of European Industrial Training 21(3): 110-116.