Concept maps and language: A Turkish experience

International Journal of Science Education

Volumn 25, Issue 11, 2003, Pages 1299-1311

  Bagci Kilic, Gulsen ^a  

^a Department of Biology   (Turkey)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADAPTATION; COGNITION; LANGUAGE; TEACHING;

TURKEY;

EID: 0348077501     PISSN: 09500693     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/0950069032000070270     Document Type: Article

References (63)

1. ABRAMS, E. and WANDERSEE, J. H. (1992). How to use a concept map to identify students' biological misconceptions. Adaptation, XIV, 4-6.
2. ALEIXANDRE, M. P. J. and GAYOSO, I. G. R. (1996). An approach to introducing environmental education into the science methods course in teacher education. Environmental Education Research, 2, 27-39.
3. AULT, C. R. (1985). Concept mapping as a study strategy in earth science. Journal of College Science Teaching, 15, 38-44.
4. BAGCI KILIC, G. (2001). Kavram haritalari ve Türkçe (Concept maps and Turkish). Paper presented at the X. (National Educational Sciences Conference, Abant Izzet Baysal University, School of Education, Bolu, Turkey).
5. BARENHOLZ, H. and TAMIR, P. (1992). A comprehensive use of concept mapping in design of instruction and assessment. Research in Science and Technological Education, 10, 37-52.
6. BOSCHHUIZEN, R. (1988). The hierarchical ordering of conceptual systems in biology: problems of student teachers. European Journal of Teacher Education, 11, 177-184.
7. BRISCOE, C. and LAMASTER, S. U. (1991). Meaningful learning in college biology through concept mapping. American Biology Teacher, 53, 214-219.
8. CHOU, C. and LIN, H. (1997). Navigation maps in a computer-networked hypertext learning system. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Association for Educational Communications and Technology, Albuquerque, NM (ERIC ED403882).
9. CULLEN, J. (1990). Using concept maps in chemistry: an alternative view. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 27, 1067-1068.
10. EDMONDSON, K. M. (2000). Assessing science understanding through concept maps. In J. J. MINTZES, J. H. WANDERSEE and J. D. NOVAK (Eds.), Assessing science understanding. A human constructivist view (San Diego, CA: Academic Press), 15-40.
11. ENCARTA (2001a). English language. Microsoft® Encarta® Online Encyclopedia 2001, © 1997-2001 Microsoft Corporation, http://encarta.msn.com.
12. ENCARTA (2001b). Indo-European Languages. Microsoft® Encarta® Online Encyclopedia 2001, © 1997-2001 Microsoft Corporation, http://encarta.msn.com.
13. ENCARIA (2001c). Turkish Language. Microsoft® Encarta® Online Encyclopedia 2001, © 1997-2001 Microsoft Corporation, http://encarta.msn.com.
14. ENCARTA (2001d). Altaic Languages. Microsoft® Encarta® Online Encyclopedia 2001, © 1997-2001 Microsoft Corporation, http://encarta.msn.com.
15. GAFFNEY, K. E. (1992). Multiple assessment for multiple learning styles. Science Scope, 15, 54-55.
16. GONZALEZ, F. M. (1997). Evidence of rote learning of science by Spanish University Students. School Science and Mathematics, 97, 419-428.
17. GRIMES, B. F. (1992). Ethnologue, languages of the world (Dallas, TX: Summer Institute of Linguistics).
18. GUNAY, Y. and HAMURCU, H., (2000). Ilkögretim fen ögretiminde kavram haritalari (Concept maps in elementary science education). Paper presented at the IV National Science and Mathematics Education Conference, Hacettepe University, Ankara, Turkey.
19. HASHWEH, M. Z. (1986). Effects of subject-matter knowledge in the teaching of biology and physics. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, San Francisco, CA (ERIC ED275502).
20. HOLMES, G. A. and LEITZEL, T. C. (1993). Evaluating learning through a constructivist paradigm. Performance and Instruction, 32, 28-30.
21. HUAI, H. (1997). Concept mapping in learning biology: theoretical review on cognitive and learning styles. Journal of Interactive Learning Research, 8, 325-340.
22. KAPTAN, F. (1998). Fen ögretiminde kavram haritasi yönteminin kullanilmasi (The use of concept map technique in science education). Hacettepe University Journal of Education, 14, 95-99.
23. LAFFEY, J. M. and SINGER, J. (1997). Using mapping for cognitive assessment in project-based science. Journal of Interactive Learning Research, 8, 363-387.
24. LANG, M. and OLSON, J. (2000). Integrated science teaching as a challenge for teachers to develop new conceptual structures. Research in Science Education, 30, 213-224.
25. LEE, J. J. (1999). The impact of Korean language accommodations on concept mapping: tasks for Korean American English Language Learners. Paper presented at American Educational Research Association annual meeting, Montreal, Canada.
26. LLOYD, C. V. (1990). The elaboration of concepts in three biology textbooks: facilitating student learning. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 27, 1019-1032.
27. MARKHAM, K. M., MINTZES, J. J. and JONES, M. G. (1994). The concept map as a research and evaluation tool: further evidence of validity. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 31, 91-101.
28. MARKOW, P. G. and LONNING, R. A. (1998). Usefulness of concept maps in college chemistry laboratories: students perceptions and effects on achievement. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 35, 1015-1029.
29. MATRICARDI, G., MURATORI, R., PORRO, R., PIROLA, E. and CAPOZZA, A. (2000). Science education and controversial issues: a case study. Paper presented at Technological Education and National Development Conference, Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates (ERIC ED447305).
30. MOREIRA, M. (1985). Concept mapping: an alternative strategy for evaluation. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 10, 159-168.
31. NOVAK, J. D. (1990). Concept mapping: a useful tool for science education. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 27, 937-949.
32. NOVAK, J. D. (1998). Learning, creating and using knowledge: concept maps as facilitative tools in schools and corporations. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
33. NOVAK, J. D. and GOWIN, D. B. (1984). Learning how to Learn (New York: Cambridge University Press).
34. NOVAK, J. D. and MUSANDA, D. (1991), A twelve-year longitudinal study of science concept learning. American Educational Research Journal, 28, 117-153.
35. NOVAK, J. D. and WANDERSEE, J. H. (1990). Perspectives on concept mapping. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 27, 10.
36. OKEBUKOLA, P. A. (1990). Attaining meaningful learning of concepts in genetics and ecology: an examination of the potency of the concept-mapping technique. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 27, 493-504.
37. PANKRATIUS, W. J. (1990). Building an organized knowledge base. Concept mapping and achievement in secondary school physics. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 27, 315-333.
38. PEARSON, J. T. and HUGHES, W. J. (1986). Designing an a-level genetics course: identifying the necessary concepts and considering their relationships. Journal of Biological Education, 20, 47-55.
39. PREECE, P. F. W. (1978). Exploration of semantic space: review of research on the organisation of scientific concepts in semantic memory. Science Education, 63, 547-562.
40. QUILLAN, M. R. (1967). Word concepts: a theory and simulation of some basic semantic capabilities. Behavioral Sciences, 12, 41-430.
41. RAYMOND, A. M. (1997). The use of concept mapping in qualitative research: a multiple case study in mathematics education. Focus on Learning Problems in Mathematics, 19, 1-28.
42. REGIS, A. and ALBERTAZZI, P. G. (1996). Concept maps in chemistry education. Journal of Chemical Education, 73, 1084-1088.
43. RHONECK, C. V. (1985). Semantic structures describing the electric circuit and their influence for the improvement of teaching. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Chicago, IL (ERIC ED254751).
44. RICE, D. C., RYAN, J. M. and SAMSON, S. M. (1998). Using concept maps to assess student learning in the science classroom: must different methods compete? Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 35, 1103-1127.
45. ROBERTS, L. (1999). Using concept maps to measure statistical understanding. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 30, 707-717.
46. ROSS, B. and MUNBY, H. (1991). Concept mapping and misconceptions: a study of high-school students' understanding of acids and bases. International Journal of Science Education, 13, 11-23.
47. ROTH, W. and ROYCHOUDHURY, A. (1993). The concept map as a tool for the collaborative construction of knowledge: a microanalysis of high school physics students. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 30, 503-534.
48. ROTH, W. M. (1992). Dynamic evaluation. Science Scope, 15, 37-40.
49. RYE, J. A. and RUBBA, P. A. (1998). An exploration of the concept map as an interview tool to facilitate the externalization of students' understandings about global atmospheric change. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 35, 521-546.
50. SCHMID, R. F. and TELARO, G. (1990). Concept mapping as an instructional strategy for high school biology. Journal of Educational Research, 84, 78-85.
51. SOKMEN, N. and BAYRAM, H. (2000). Egitimde kavram haritalarinin önemi (The importance of concept maps in education). Education and Science, 25, 115.
52. STODDART, T, ABRAMS, R., GASPER, E. and CANADAY, D. (2000). Concept maps as assessment in science inquiry learning-a report of methodology. International Journal of Science Education, 22, 1221-1246.
53. TROWBRIDGE, J. E. and WANDERSEE, J. H. (1994). Using concept mapping in a college course on evolution: identifying critical junctures in learning. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 31, 459-475.
54. TROWBRIDGE, J. E. and WANDERSEE, J. H. (1998). Theory-driven graphic organizers. In J. J. MINTZES, WANDERSEE J. H. and J. D. NOVAK (Eds.), Teaching science for understanding. A human constructivist view (San Diego, CA: Academic Press), 95-131.
55. UCLA Language Materials Project (2000). Learning resources for less commonly taught languages of the world, http://www.lmp.ucla.edu/.
56. VAN BOXTEL, C., VAN DER LINDEN, J. and KANSELAAR, G. (1997). Collaborative construction of conceptual understanding: interaction processes and learning outcomes emerging from a concept mapping and a poster task. Journal of Interactive Learning Research, 8, 341-361.
57. VAN BOXTEL, C., VAN DER LINDEN, J. L. and KANSELAAR, G. (2000). Collaborative learning tasks and elaboration of conceptual knowledge. Learning and Instruction, 10, 311-330.
58. WALLACE, J. P. and MINTZES, J. J. (1990). The concept map as a research tool: exploring conceptual change in bilogy. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 27, 1033-1052.
59. WANDERSEE, J. H. (1987). Drawing concept circles. A new way to teach and test students. Science Activities, 27, 923-936.
60. WANDERSEE, J. H. (1990). Concept mapping and the cartography of cognition. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 27, 923-936.
61. WILSON, J. M. (1994). Network representations of knowledge about chemical equilibrium: variations with achievement. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 31, 1133-1147.
62. WILSON, J. (1996). Concept maps about chemical equilibrium and students' achievement scores. Research in Science Education, 26, 169-185.
63. ZOLLER, U. (1990). Students' misunderstandings and misconceptions in college freshman chemistry (general and organic). Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 27, 1053-1065.