Integrated science teaching as a challenge for teachers to develop new conceptual structures

Research in Science Education

Volumn 30, Issue 2, 2000, Pages 213-224

  Lang, Manfred ^a   Olson, John ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF KIEL   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0347913145     PISSN: 0157244X     EISSN: 15731898     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/BF02461629     Document Type: Article

References (39)

1. Alexander, P., & Judy, J. (1988). The interaction of domain-specific and strategic knowledge in academic performance. Review of Educational Research, 58(4), 375-404.
2. Atkin, M. (1998). The OECD study of innovations in science, mathematics and technology education. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 30(6), 647-660.
3. Bauer, K.-O. (1999). On teachers' professional self. In M. Lang, J. Olson, K.-H. Hansen, & W. Bünder (Eds.), Changing practices/changing schools: Recent research on teachers' professionalism (pp. 193-201). Leuven, Belgium: Garant.
4. Black, P., & William, D. (1998). Inside the black box. Raising standards through classroom assessment. London: Kings College.
5. Black, P., & Atkin, J. (Eds.).(1996). Changing the subject. Innovations in science, mathematics and technology education. London: Routledge/OECD.
6. Bund-Länder-Kommission für Bildungsplanung und Forschungsförderung (BLK). (1997). Gutachten zur Vorbereitung des Programms "Steigerung der Effizienz des mathematischnaturwissenschaftlichlichen Unterrichts [Expertise for Preparation of the Program "Increase of Efficiency in Mathematics and Science Education"]. Bonn, Germany: Bund-Länder -Kommission für Bildungsplanung und Forschungsfö rderung [Commission of the Central and Federal States Governments for Educational Planning and Research Promotion].
7. Buhren, C., Killus, D., & Müller, S. (1998). Wege und Methoden der Selbstevaluation [Ways and methods for self-evaluation]. Beiträge 6. Dortmund, Germany: Institut für Schulentwicklungsforschung.
8. Bybee, R. (1997). Achieving scientific literacy: From purposes to practices. Portsmouth, England: Heinemann.
9. Close, D. (1996). National standards and benchmarks in science education. ERIC Digest ED402156.
10. Fischer, H., Hucke. L, & Gerull, K. (1999). The interpretation of concept maps using a reference. In M. Komorek, H. Berendt, H. Dahncke, R. Duit, W. Gräber, & A. Kross (Eds.), Research in science education. Past, present, and future (pp. 269-271). Proceedings of the Second International Conference of the European Science Education Research Association (E.S.E.R.A). Kiel, Germany: Institute for Science Education (IPN).
11. Frey, K. (1973). Zum Begriff Integriertes Curriculum Naturwissenschaften [About the concept of integrated curriculum for science education]. In K. Frey, & P. Häußler (Eds.), Integriertes Curriculum Naturwissenschaft: Theoretische Grundlagen und Ansätze [Integrated curriculum for science education: Theoretical basis and approaches]. Weinheim, Germany: Beltz.
12. Frey, K. (1974). Integrated science education in the Federal Republic of Germany. Contribution to the symposium: "An interdisciplinary approach towards the teaching of science subjects at the secondary level." Exeter, UK: Council of Europe.
13. Hansen, K.-H. (1999). Science teacher socialization and professional development: integrated science education as a challenge for teaching. In M. Lang, J. Olson, K.-H. Hansen, & W. Bünder (Eds.), Changing practices/changing schools: Recent research on teachers' professionalism (pp. 134-148). Leuven, Belgium: Garant.
14. Hashweh, M. (1987). Effects of subject matter knowledge in the teaching of biology and physics. Teaching and Teacher Education, 3, 109-120.
15. Huber, L., & Effe-Stumpf G. (1994). Der fächerübergreifende Unterricht am Oberstufen-Kolleg [Integrated Teaching at the Upper Secondary College]. In U. Krause-Isermann, J. Kupsch, & M. Schumacher (Eds.), Perspektivwechsel [Change in Perspective]. (Ambos 38). Bielefeld, Germany: Kramer.
16. Korthagen, F., & Kessel, J. (1999). Linking theory and practice: Changing the pedagogy ofteacher education. Educational Researcher, 28(4), 4-17.
17. Lang, M. (1997). Neue Wege für den naturwissenschaftlichen Unterricht [New ways for teaching science]. IPN-Materialien. Kiel, Germany: Institute for Science Education (IPN).
18. Lang, M. (1998). Leitfaden zur Sicherung der Qualität schulischer Bildung und schulübergreifender Standards für den mathematisch- naturwissenschaftlichen Bereich [Manual for the gain of quality in schooling and general standards for science and mathematics education]. Manuskript. Kiel, Germany: Institute for Science Education (IPN).
19. Lang, M. (2000). Mediated exchange and reflective collaboration: A model of science teaching development. Journal of Teachers and Teaching, 6(9), 9-22.
20. Markham, K., Mintzes, J., & Jones, M. (1994). The concept map as a research and evaluation tool: Further evidence for validity. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 31(1), 1-11.
21. Mason C. (1992). Concept mapping: A tool to develop reflective instruction. Science Education, 76(1), 51-63.
22. Miller, K., & Davison, D. (1998). Is thematic integration the best way to reform science and mathematics education? Science Educator, 7(1), 7-12.
23. National Research Council. (1996). National science educational standards. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
24. Novak, J. (1990). Concept mapping: A useful tool for science education. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 27(10), 937-949.
25. Olson, J. (1992). Understanding teaching. Milton Keynes: Open University Press.
26. Olson J., James E., & Lang M. (1999). Changing the subject: The challenges to teacher professionalism of innovation in OECD countries. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 31(1), 69-83.
27. Piaget, J. (1957). Logic and psychology. New York: Basic books.
28. Plotnick, E. (1997). Concept mapping: A graphical system for understanding the relationship between concepts. ERIC Digest ED407938
29. Riquarts, K., & Hansen, K.-H. (1998). Collaboration among teachers, researchers and inservice trainers to develop an integrated science curriculum. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 30,(6), 661-676.
30. Projektkerngruppe (PING). (1996). Kurzinformation, Status, Konzeption, Entwicklung [Short information, status, conception, development]. Kiel, Germany: Institute for Science Education (IPN).
31. Robertson, C., Cowell, B., & Olson, J. (1998). A case study of integration and destreaming: Teachers and students in an Ontario secondary school respond. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 30(6), 691-717.
32. Ruiz-Primo M., Shavelson R., & Schulz S. (1997). On the validity of concept maps-base assessment interpretations: An experiment testing the assumption of hierarchical concept maps in science. (CSE technical report 455). Los Angeles: National Centre for Research on Evaluation, Standards, and Student Testing (CRESST).
33. Seiler, T. (1973). Die Bereichsspezifität formaler Denkstruturen -Konsequenzen für den pädagogischen Prozeß [Domain specific formal structures of thinking-consequences for the psychological process]. In K. Frey, & M. Lang (Eds.), Kognitionspsychologie und naturwissenschaftlicher Unterricht - Cognitive processes and science instruction (pp.249-285). Bern, Germany: Huber.
34. Terhart, E. (1995). Didaktik/Curriculum in teacher education: Some German complications. In S. Hopmann, & K. Riquarts, (Eds.), Didaktik and/or Curriculum. Kiel, Germany: Institute for Science Education (IPN).
35. Terhart, E. (1999). Developing a professional culture. In M. Lang, J. Olson, K.-H. Hansen, & W. Bünder (Eds.), Changing schools/changing practices: Perspectives on educational reform and teacher professionalism (pp. 27-40). Leuven, Belgium: Garant.
36. Trent, S., Pernell, E., Mungai, A., & Chimedza, R. (1998). Using concept maps to measure conceptual change in preservice teachers enrolled in a multicultural education/special education course. Remedial and Special Education, 19(1), 16-31.
37. Wiley, D., & Resnick, L. (1997). The new standards reference examination: Standards-referenced scoring system. CSE technical report 470. Los Angeles, CA: National Centre for Research on Evaluation, Standards and Student Testing (CRESST).
38. Wilson, J. (1994). Network representations of knowledge about chemical equilibrium: Variations with achievement. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 31(10), 133-142.
39. Yinger, R., & Hendriks-Lee, M. (1998). Professional development standards as a new context for professional development in the U.S. Teachers and Teaching: Theory and Practice, 4, 273-298.