Clinical trial comparing plasma arc and conventional halogen curing lights for orthodontic bonding

American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics

Volumn 125, Issue 1, 2004, Pages 30-35

  Manzo, Bruno ^a,b   Liistro, Giuseppe ^a   De Clerck, Hugo ^a  

^a CLINIQUES UNIVERSITAIRES SAINT LUC   (Belgium)

^b NONE   (Belgium)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

HALOGEN;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ARTICLE; CHEMICAL BOND; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; EVALUATION; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; HUMAN; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; MALE; ORTHODONTICS; RELIABILITY; SCHOOL CHILD; SURVIVAL;

EID: 0347355600     PISSN: 08895406     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2003.03.003     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. Rossouw P.E. Enamel bonding. A significant contribution to clinical orthodontics practice. Ont Dent. 74:1997;39-40.
2. Hamula W. Direct bonding with light-cured adhesives. J Clin Orthod. 25:1991;437-438.
3. Armas Galindo H.R., Sadowsky P.L., Vlachos C., Jacobson A., Wallace D. An in vivo comparison between a visible light-cured bonding system and a chemically cured bonding system. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 113:1998;271-275.
4. Sonis A.L. Comparison of a light-cured adhesive with an autopolymerizing bonding system. J Clin Orthod. 22:1988;730-732.
5. Visible light-cured composites and activating units. J Am Dent Assoc. 110:1985;100-103.
6. Lalani N., Foley T.F., Voth R., Banting D., Mamandras A. Polymerization with the argon laser curing time and shear bond strength . Angle Orthod. 70:2000;28-33.
7. Talbot T.Q., Blankenau R.J., Zobitz M.E., Weaver A.L., Lohse C.M., Rebellato J. Effect of argon laser irradiation on shear bond strength of orthodontic brackets an in vitro study . Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 118:2000;274-279.
8. Oesterle L.J., Newman S.M., Shellhart W.C. Rapid curing of bonding composite with a xenon plasma arc light. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 119:2001;610-616.
9. Sfondrini M.F., Cacciafesta V., Klersy C. Halogen versus high-intensity light-curing of uncoated and precoated brackets a shear bond strength study . J Orthod. 29:2002;45-50.
10. Sfondrini M.F., Cacciafesta V., Pistorio A., Sfondrini G. Effects of conventional and high-intensity light-curing on enamel shear bond strength of composite resin and resin-modified glass-ionomer. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 119:2001;30-35.
11. Ishikawa H., Komori A., Kojima I., Ando F. Orthodontic bracket bonding with a plasma-arc light and resin-reinforced glass ionomer cement. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 120:2001;58-63.
12. Pettemerides A.P., Ireland A.J., Sherriff M. An ex vivo investigation into the use of a plasma arc lamp when using a visible light-cured composite and a resin-modified glass poly(alkenoate) cement in orthodontic bonding. J Orthod. 28:2001;237-244.
13. Fowler P.V. A twelve-month clinical trial comparing the bracket failure rates of light-cured resin-modified glass-ionomer adhesive and acid-etch chemical-cured composite. Aust Orthod J. 15:1998;186-190.
14. Cacciafesta V., Bosch C., Melsen B. Clinical comparison between a resin-reinforced self-cured glass ionomer cement and a composite resin for direct bonding of orthodontic brackets. Part 2 Bonding on dry enamel and on enamel soaked with saliva . Clin Orthod Res. 2:1999;186-193.
15. Millett D.T., Hallgren A., Cattanach D., McFadzean R., Pattison J., Robertson M., et al. A 5-year clinical review of bond failure with a light-cured resin adhesive. Angle Orthod. 68:1998;351-356.
16. Fleiss J.L. Statistical methods for rates and proportions. 2nd ed :1982;John Wiley & Sons, New York.
17. Daly L.E., Bourke G.J. Interpretation and uses of medical statistics. 4th ed :2000;Blackwell Science, Oxford.
18. Ash S., Hay N. Adhesive pre-coated brackets, a comparative clinical study. Br J Orthod. 23:1996;325-329.
19. O'Brien K.D., Read M.J., Sandison R.J., Roberts C.T. A visible light-activated direct-bonding material an in vivo comparative study . Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 95:1989;348-351.
20. Trimpeneers L.M., Dermaut L.R. A clinical trial comparing the failure rates of two orthodontic bonding systems. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 110:1996;547-550.
21. Chung C.H., Piatti A. Clinical comparison of the bond failure rates between fluoride-releasing and non-fluoride-releasing composite resins. J Clin Orthod. 34:2000;409-412.
22. De Saeytijd C., Carels C.E., Lesaffre E. An evaluation of a light-curing composite for bracket placement. Eur J Orthod. 16:1994;541-545.
23. Knoll M., Gwinnett A.J., Wolff M.S. Shear bond strength of brackets bonded to anterior and posterior teeth. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 89:1986;476-479.
24. Whittaker D.K. Structural variations in the surface zone of human tooth enamel observed by scanning electron microscopy. Arch Oral Biol. 27:1982;383-392.
25. Lovius BBJ, Pender N, Hewage S, O'Dowling, Tomkins A. A clinical trial of a light activated bonding material over an 18-month period. Br J Orthod 1987;14:11-20.
26. Pender N., Dresner E., Wilson S., Vowles R. Shear strength of orthodontic bonding agent. Eur J Orthod. 10:1988;374-379.
27. Zachrisson B.U. A posttreatment evaluation of direct bonding in orthodontics. Am J Orthod. 71:1977;173-189.
28. Reynolds I.R. A review of direct orthodontic bonding. Br J Orthod. 2:1975;171-178.
29. Carstensen W. Clinical results after direct bonding of brackets using shorter etching times. Am J Orthod. 89:1986;70-72.
30. Berry E.A. 3rd, Pitts D.G., Francisco P.R., von der Lehr W.N. An evaluation of lenses designed to block light emitted by light-curing units. J Am Dent Assoc. 112:1986;70-72.
31. Makinson O.F. Curing lights and eye protection. Clinical note no. 4. Aust Dent J. 31:1986;137-138.
32. Ham W.T. Ocular hazard of light sources review of current knowledge . J Occup Med. 25:1983;101-103.
33. The effects of blue light on the retina and the use of protective filtering eyeglasses. J Am Dent Assoc. 112:1986;533-535.