![]() |
Volumn 113, Issue 3, 1998, Pages 271-275
|
An in vivo comparison between a visible light-cured bonding system and a chemically cured bonding system.
a
|
Author keywords
[No Author keywords available]
|
Indexed keywords
FLUORIDE;
METHACRYLIC ACID DERIVATIVE;
POLYURETHAN;
RESIN;
RESIN CEMENT;
SEQUENCE (BONDING AGENT);
SYSTEM 1 PLUS;
ARTICLE;
CANINE TOOTH;
CHEMISTRY;
CHI SQUARE DISTRIBUTION;
COMPARATIVE STUDY;
DENTAL ACID ETCHING;
DENTAL BONDING;
EQUIPMENT;
EVALUATION;
FEMALE;
FOLLOW UP;
HUMAN;
INCISOR;
LIGHT;
LONGITUDINAL STUDY;
MALE;
METHODOLOGY;
ORTHODONTIC DEVICE;
PHYSICAL CHEMISTRY;
PREMOLAR TOOTH;
REPRODUCIBILITY;
ACID ETCHING, DENTAL;
BICUSPID;
CHEMISTRY, PHYSICAL;
CHI-SQUARE DISTRIBUTION;
COMPOSITE RESINS;
CUSPID;
DENTAL BONDING;
EQUIPMENT FAILURE;
EVALUATION STUDIES;
FEMALE;
FLUORIDES;
FOLLOW-UP STUDIES;
HUMANS;
INCISOR;
LIGHT;
LONGITUDINAL STUDIES;
MALE;
METHACRYLATES;
ORTHODONTIC BRACKETS;
POLYURETHANES;
REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS;
RESIN CEMENTS;
MLCS;
MLOWN;
|
EID: 0032014731
PISSN: 08895406
EISSN: None
Source Type: Journal
DOI: 10.1016/s0889-5406(98)70296-3 Document Type: Article |
Times cited : (42)
|
References (0)
|