When is it "a pleasure to do business with you?" The effects of relative status, outcome favorability, and procedural fairness

Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes

Volumn 92, Issue 1-2, 2003, Pages 1-21

  Chen, Ya Ru ^a   Brockner, Joel ^b   Greenberg, Jerald ^c  

^a NEW YORK UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b Och Spine at New York Presbyterian Hospitals   (United States)

^c OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0346973469     PISSN: 07495978     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0749-5978(03)00062-1     Document Type: Article

References (62)

1. Adler, J. W., Hensler, D. R., & Nelson, C. E. (1983). Simple justice: How litigants fare in the Pittsburgh Court Arbitration Program. Santa Monica, CA: Rand.
2. Aiken, L. S., & West, S. G. (1991). Multiple regression: Testing and interpreting interactions. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
3. Baron, R. M., & Kenny, D. (1986). The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 58, 1173-1182.
4. Bartko, J. J. (1976). On various intraclass correlation reliability coefficients. Psychological Bulletin, 83, 762-765.
5. Bies, R. J. (1987). The predicament of injustice: The management of moral outrage. In L. L. Cummings, & B. M. Staw (Eds.), Research in organizational behavior (Vol. 9, pp. 289-319). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
6. Bies, R. J. (2001). Interactional (in)justice: The scared and the profane. In J. Greenberg, & R. Cropanzano (Eds.), Advances in organizational justice (pp. 89-118). Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
7. Blau, P. (1964). Exchange and power in social life. New York: Wiley.
8. Blumer, H. (1960). Race prejudice as a sense of group position. Pacific Sociological Review, 1, 3-5.
9. Brewer, M. B., & Brown, R. J. (1998). Intergroup relations. In D. T. Gilbert, S. T. Fiske, & G. Lindzey (Eds.), The handbook of social psychology (Vol. 2, (4th ed., pp. 554-594). New York: Oxford University Press.
10. Brockner, J. (2002). Making sense of procedural fairness: How high procedural fairness can reduce or heighten the influence of outcome favorability. Academy of Management Review, 27, 58-76.
11. Brockner, J., Chen, Y., Mannix, E., Leung, K., & Skarlicki, D. (2000). Culture and procedural fairness: When the effects of what you do depend upon how you do it. Administrative Science Quarterly, 45, 138-159.
12. Brockner, J., Heuer, L. B., Magner, N., Folger, R., Umphress, E., Van den Bos, K., Vermunt, R., Magner, M., & Siegel, P. A. (in press). High procedural fairness heightens the effect of outcome favorability on self-evaluations: An attributional analysis. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes.
13. Brockner, J., Konovsky, M., Cooper-Schneider, R., Folger, R., Martin, C. L., & Bies, R. J. (1994). The interactive effects of procedural justice and outcome negativity on the victims and survivors of job loss. Academy of Management Journal, 37, 397-409.
14. Brockner, J., Siegel, P. A., Daly, J., Tyler, T. R., & Martin, C. (1997). When trust matters: The moderating effect of outcome favorability. Administrative Science Quarterly, 42, 558-583.
15. Brockner, J., & Wiesenfeld, B. M. (1996). An integrative framework for explaining reactions to decisions: The interactive effects of outcomes and procedures. Psychological Bulletin, 120, 189-208.
16. Chatman, J., Polzer, J., Barsade, S., & Neale, M. (1998). Being different yet feeling similar: The influence of demographic composition and organizational culture on work processes and outcomes. Administrative Science Quarterly, 43, 749-780.
17. Chen, Y., Blount, S., & Sanchez-Burks, J. (in press). Status in group synchronization. In: M. Neale, & E. A. Mannix (Eds.), Research on managing groups and teams (Vol. 6). San Diego, CA: Elsevier.
18. Colquitt, J. (2001). On the dimensionality of organizational justice: A construct validation study. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86, 386-400.
19. Crocker, J., Major, B., & Steele, C. M. (1998). Social stigma. In D. T. Gilbert, S. T. Fiske, & G. Lindzey (Eds.), The handbook of social psychology (Vol. 2, (4th ed., pp. 504-554). New York: Oxford University Press.
20. Eden, D. (1988). Pygmalion in management. Lexington, MA: Lexington Books.
21. Ellemers, N., Van Rijswijk, W., Roefs, M., & Simons, C. (1997). Bias in intergroup perceptions: Balancing group identity with social reality. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 23, 186-198.
22. Elsbach, K., & Kramer, R. M. (1996). Members' responses to organizational identity threats: Encountering and countering the Business Week rankings. Administrative Science Quarterly, 41, 442-476.
23. Evans, M. G. (1985). A Monte-Carlo study of the effects of correlated method variance in moderated multiple regression analysis. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 36, 305-323.
24. Fiske, S. T. (1993). Controlling other people: The impact of power on stereotypes. American Psychologist, 48, 621-628.
25. Fiske, S. T. (2001). Effects of power on bias: Power explains and maintains individual, group, and societal disparities. In A. Y. Lee-Chai, & J. A. Bargh (Eds.), The use and abuse of power: Multiple perspectives on the causes of corruption (pp. 181-193). Philadelphia, PA: Psychology Press/Taylor & Francis.
26. Folger, R. (1986). Rethinking equity theory: A referent cognitions model. In H. W. Bierhoff, R. L. Cohen, & J. Greenberg (Eds.), Justice in social relations (pp. 145-162). New York: Plenum.
27. Folger, R. (1993). Reactions to mistreatment at work. In J. K. Murnighan (Ed.), Social psychology in organizations: Advances in theory and research (pp. 161-183). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
28. Folger, R., & Martin, C. (1986). Relative deprivation and referent cognitions: Distributive and procedural justice effects. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 22, 531-546.
29. Folger, R., & Cropanzano, R. (1998). Organizational justice and human resource management. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
30. Folger, R., Rosenfield, D., & Robinson, T. (1983). Relative deprivation and procedural justification. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 45, 268-273.
31. Greenberg, J. (1986). Differential intolerance for inequity from organizational and individual agents. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 16, 191-196.
32. Greenberg, J. (1994). Using socially fair treatment to promote acceptance of a work site smoking ban. Journal of Applied Psychology, 79, 288-297.
33. Greenberg, J. (1996). The guest for justice on the job: Essays and experiments. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
34. Greenberg, J., & Colquitt, J. A. (in press). Organizational Justice: A primer. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
35. Heuer, L. B., Blumenthal, E., Douglas, A., & Weinblatt, T. (1999). The generality of procedural justice concerns: A deservedness model of group value and self-interest based fairness concerns. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 25, 1279-1292.
36. Keltner, D., Gruenfeld, D. H., & Anderson, C. (in press). Power, approach, and inhibition. Psychological Review.
37. Kenny, D. A., & LaVoie, L. (1985). Separating individual and group effects. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 48, 339-448.
38. Kim, W. C., & Mauborgne, R. (1997). Fair process: Managing in the knowledge economy. Harvard Business Review, 75, 65-75.
39. Konovsky, M., & Pugh, S. D. (1994). Citizenship behavior and social exchange. Academy of Management Journal, 37, 656-669.
40. Kramer, R. M. (1996). Divergent realities and convergent disappointments in the hierarchic relation: Trust and the intuitive auditor at work. In R. M. Kramer, & T. R. Tyler (Eds.), Trust in organizations: Frontiers of theory and research (pp. 216-245). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
41. Kramer, R. M., & Tyler, T. R. (1996). Trust in organizations: Frontiers of theory and research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
42. Kwong, J. Y., & Leung, K. (2002). A moderator of the interaction effect of procedural justice and outcome favorability: Importance of the relationship. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 87, 278-299.
43. Lind, E. A. (2001). Fairness heuristic theory: Justice judgments as pivotal cognitions in organizational relations. In J. Greenberg, & R. Cropanzano (Eds.), Advances in organizational justice (pp. 56-88). Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
44. Lind, E. A., & Tyler, T. R. (1988). The social psychology of procedural justice. New York: Plenum Press.
45. Magner, N., Welker, R. B., & Johnson, G. G. (1996). The interactive effects of participation and outcome favorability on turnover intentions and evaluations of supervisors. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 69, 135-143.
46. Mark, M. M., & Folger, R. (1984). Responses to relative deprivation: A conceptual framework. In P. Shaver (Ed.), Review of personality and social psychology (Vol. 5, pp. 192-218). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
47. Markus, H. R., & Kitayama, S. (1991). Culture and the self: Implications for cognition, emotion, and motivation. Psychological Review, 98, 224-253.
48. Pfeffer, J. (1992). Managing with power: Politics and influence in organizations. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.
49. Schroth, H., & Shah, P. (2000). Procedures, do we really want to know them? Journal of Applied Psychology, 85, 462-471.
50. Simmel, G. (1950). The sociology of Georg Simmel. Glencoe, IL: Free Press.
51. Swann, W. B., Jr. (1996). Self-traps: The elusive quest for higher self-esteem. New York: W.H. Freeman.
52. Tajfel, H., & Turner, J. C. (1986). The social identity theory of intergroup behavior. In S. Worchel, & W. G. Austin (Eds.), Psychology of intergroup relations (pp. 7-24). Chicago: Nelson-Hall.
53. Tenbrunsel, A. E., & Bazerman, M. H. (1997). Working women. Evanston, IL: Dispute Resolution Research Center.
54. Terry, D. J., Carey, C. J., & Callan, V. J. (2001). Employee adjustment to an organizational merger: An intergroup perspective. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 267-280.
55. Thibaut, J., & Walker, L. (1975). Procedural justice: A psychological analysis. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
56. Tyler, T. R., & Caine, A. (1981). The influence of outcomes and procedures on satisfaction with formal leaders. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 41, 642-655.
57. Tyler, T. R., & Lind, E. A. (1992). A relational model of authority in groups. In M. P. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 25, pp. 115-191). New York: Academic Press.
58. Van den Bos, K., Bruins, J., Wilke, H. A. M., & Dronkert, E. (1999). Sometimes unfair procedures have nice aspects: On the psychology of the fair process effect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 77, 324-336.
59. Van den Bos, K., Wilke, H. A. M., & Lind, E. A. (1998). When do we need procedural fairness. The role of trust in authority. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75, 1449-1458.
60. Van Prooijen, J. W., Van den Bos, K., & Wilke, H. A. M. (2002). Procedural justice and status: Status salience as antecedent of procedural fairness effects. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 83, 1353-1361.
61. Weiss, E. S., & Murtha, T. P. (1997). IBM-Mexico microcomputer investment negotiations. Ann Arbor, MI: Research on Learning and Teaching.
62. Wiesenfeld, B. M., Brockner, J., & Thibault, V. (2000). Procedural fairness, managers' self-esteem, and managerial behaviors following a layoff. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 83, 1-32.