Chiral polymorphism: a scanning tunneling microscopy study

Langmuir

Volumn 16, Issue 25, 2000, Pages 9887-9894

  De Feyter, Steven ^a   Gesquière, André ^a   De Schryver, Frans ^a   Meiners, Christian ^b   Sieffert, Michel ^b   Müllen, Klaus ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF LEUVEN   (Belgium)

^b MAX PLANCK INSTITUTE FOR POLYMER RESEARCH   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CARBOXYLIC ACIDS; CONFORMATIONS; CRYSTAL STRUCTURE; GRAPHITE; INTERFACES (MATERIALS); MOLECULAR STRUCTURE; SCANNING TUNNELING MICROSCOPY; SOLUTIONS; SUBSTRATES;

CHIRAL POLYMORPHISM; ENANTIOSPECIFICITY; PYROLITIC GRAPHITE;

MONOLAYERS;

EID: 0346552806     PISSN: 07437463     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1021/la000693x     Document Type: Article

References (56)

1. Pasteur, L. C. R. Hebd. Seances Acad. Sci. 1848, 26, 535-539.
2. Takanishi, Y.; Takezoe, H.; Suzuki, Y.; Kobayashi, I.; Yajima, T.; Terada, M.; Mikami, K. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. Engl. 1999, 38, 2353-2356.
3. (a) Du, X. Z.; Liang, Y. Q. Chem. Phys. Lett. 1999, 313, 565-568.
4. (b) Xue, Q. B.; Yang, K. Z.; Xiao, C.; Zhang, Q. Z. Thin Solid Films 1999, 347, 263-271.
5. (c) Kuzmenko, I.; Kjaer, K.; Als-Nielsen, J.; Lahav, M.; Leiserowitz, L. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1999, 121, 2657-2661.
6. (d) Zhong, O. Y.; Xu, X. B.; Wu, C. X.; Iwamoto, M. Phys. Rev. E 1999, 59, 2105-2108.
7. (e) Iwamoto, M.; Wu, C. X.; Zhong, O. Y. Phys. Rev. E 1999, 59, 586-590.
8. (f) Prus, P.; Pietraskiewicz, M.; Bilewicz, R. Supramol. Chem. 1998, 10, 17-25.
9. (g) Scalas, E.; Brezesinski, G.; Kaganer, V. M.; Möhwald, H. Phys. Rev. E 1998, 58, 2172-2178.
10. (h) Yamagishi, A.; Sasa, N.; Taniguchi, M. Langmuir 1997, 13, 1689-1694.
11. (i) Scalas, E.; Brezesinski, G.; Möhwald, H.; Kaganer, V. M.; Bouwman, W. G.; Kjaer, K. Thin Solid Films 1996, 285, 56-61.
12. (j) Rietz, R.; Rettig, W.; Brezesinski, G.; Bouwman, W. G.; Kjaer, K.; Möhwald, H. Thin Solid Films 1996, 285, 211-215.
13. (k) Vollhardt, D.; Emrich, G.; Gutberlet, T.; Fuhrhop, J. H. Langmuir 1996, 12, 5659-5663.
14. (l) Parazak, D. P.; Uang, J. Y.-J.; Turner, B.; Stine, K. J. Langmuir 1994, 10, 3787-3793.
15. (m) Selinger, J. V.; Wang, Z.-G.; Bruinsma, R. F.; Knobler, C. M. Phys. Rev. Lett. 1993, 70, 1139-1142.
16. (n) Rietz, R.; Brezesinski, G.; Möhwald, H. Ber. Bunsen-Ges. Phys. Chem. 1993, 97, 1394-1399.
17. (o) Andelman, D.; Orland, H. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1993, 115, 12322-12329.
18. (p) Dvolaitsky, M.; Guedeau-Boudeville, M. A. Langmuir 1989, 5, 1200-1205.
19. (q) Arnett, A. M.; Harvey, N. G.; Rose, P. L. Acc. Chem. Res. 1989, 22, 131-138.
20. (r) Tachibana, T.; Yoshizumi, T.; Hori, K. Bull. Chem. Soc. Jpn. 1979, 52, 34-41.
21. (a) Nassoy, P.; Goldman, M.; Bouloussa, O.; Rondelez, F. Phys. Rev. Lett. 1995, 75, 457-460.
22. (b) Weissbuch, I.; Berfeld, M.; Bouman, W.; Kjaer, K.; Als-Nielsen, J.; Lahav, M.; Leisorowitz, L. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1997, 119, 933-942.
23. (c) Kuzmenko, I.; Weissbuch, I.; Gurovich, E.; Leiserowitz, L.; Lahav, M. Chirality 1998, 10, 415-424.
24. (d) Lahav, M.; Leiserowitz, L. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. Engl. 1999, 38, 2533-2536.
25. Eckhardt, C. J.; Peachey, N. M.; Swanson, D. R.; Takacs, J. M.; Khan, M. A.; Gong, X.; Kim, J.-H.; Wang, J.; Uphaus, R. A. Nature 1993, 362, 614-616.
26. Viswanathan, R.; Zasadzinski, J. A.; Schwartz, D. K. Nature 1994, 368, 440-443.
27. (a) Smith, D. P. E. J. Vac. Sci. Technol., B 1991, 9, 1119-1125.
28. (b) Rabe, J. P.; Buchholz, S. Phys. Rev. Lett. 1991, 66, 2096-2099.
29. (c) Sowerby, S. J.; Heckl, W. M.; Petersen, G. B. J. Mol. Evol. 1996, 43, 419-424.
30. (d) Charra, F.; Cousty, J. Phys. Rev. Lett. 1998, 80, 1682-1685.
31. (e) Claypool, C. L.; Faglioni, F.; Matzger, A. J.; Goddard, W. A., III; Lewis, N. S. J. Phys. Chem. B 1999, 103, 9690-9699.
32. (f) Patrick, D. L.; Cee, V. J.; Morse, M. D.; Beebe, T. P. J. Phys. Chem. B 1999, 103, 8328-8336.
33. (a) Bohringer, M.; Morgenstern, K.; Schneider, W. D.; Berndt, R. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. Engl. 1999, 38, 821-823.
34. (b) Böhringer, M.; Morgenstern, K.; Schneider, W.-D.; Berndt, R.; Mauri, F.; De Vita, A.; Car, R. Phys. Rev. Lett. 1999, 83, 324-327.
35. (c) Bohringer, M.; Schneider, W. D.; Berndt, R. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2000, 39, 792-795.
36. (a) Stevens, F.; Dyer, D. J.; Walba, D. M. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. Engl. 1996, 35, 900-901.
37. (b) Walba, D. M.; Stevens, F.; Clark, N. A.; Parks, D. C. Acc. Chem. Res. 1996, 29, 591-597.
38. De Feyter, S.; Grim, P. C. M.; Rucker, M.; Vanoppen, P.; Meiners, C.; Sieffert, M.; Valiyaveettil, S.; Mullen, K.; De Schryver, F. C. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. Engl. 1998, 37, 1223-1226.
39. De Feyter, S.; Gesquiere, A.; Grim, P. C. M.; De Schryver, F. C.; Valiyaveettil, S.; Meiners, C.; Sieffert, M.; Mullen, K. Langmuir 1999, 15, 2817-2822.
40. Qian, P.; Nanjo, H.; Yokoyama, T.; Suzuki, T. M. Chem. Lett. 1998, 1133.
41. Fang, H. B.; Giancarlo, L. C.; Flynn, G. W. J. Phys. Chem. B 1998, 102, 7311-7315.
42. Le Poulennec, C.; Cousty, J.; Xie, Z.X.; Mioskowski, C. Surf. Sci. 2000, 448, 93-100.
43. (a) Lopinski, G. P.; Moffatt, D. J.; Wayner, D. D.; Wolkow, R. A. Nature 1998, 392, 909-911.
44. (b) Lopinski, G. P.; Moffatt, D. J.; Wayner, D. D. M.; Zgierski, M. Z.; Wolkow, R. A. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1999, 121, 4532-4533.
45. Claypool, C. L.; Faglioni, F.; Goddard, W. A.; Lewis, N. S. J. Phys. Chem. B 1999, 103, 7077-7080.
46. (a) Parks, D. C.; Clark, N. A.; Walba, D. M.; Beale, P. D. Phys. Rev. Lett. 1993, 70, 607-610.
47. (b) Gorman, C. B.; Gorman, C. B.; Touzov, I.; Miller, R. Langmuir 1998, 14, 3052-3061.
48. (c) Stawasz, M. E.; Sampson, D. L.; Parkinson, B. A. Langmuir 2000, 16, 2326-2342.
49. Stabel, A.; Heinz, R.; Rabe, J. P.; Wegner, G.; De Schryver, F. C.; Corens, D.; Dehaen, W.; Süling, C. J. Phys. Chem. 1995, 99, 8690-8697.
50. (a) Domenicano, M.; Schultz, G.; Hargittai, I.; Colapietro, M.; Portalone, G.; George, P. Struct. Chem. 1990, 1, 107.
51. (b) Meiners, C.; Müllen, K. Private communication.
52. These error values reflect the uncertainty in the determination of the direction of the lamella axis and the graphite reference axis and also take into account uncertainties caused by possible image distortions.
53. Bernstein, J.; Hagler, A. T. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1978, 100, 673.
54. 2 axis in the plane of the substrate. Although this symmetry operation leads to enantiomorphous unit cells, the monolayer structures are not enantiomorphous (Figure 1C). For instance, in one case the methyl group on the stereogenic center would be directed toward the supernatant solution whereas after the 2-fold rotation, this methyl group would be directed to the graphite substrate, resulting in different interaction energies.
55. Parks, D. C.; Clark, N. A.; Walba, D. M.; Beale, P. D. Phys. Rev. Lett. 1993, 70, 607-610.
56. For the MM+ calculations, one S-enantiomer molecule has been modeled on a sufficiently large piece of graphite. Several initial start conformations were sampled. The molecular structure corresponding to the lowest energy conformation was used as the building unit to construct the molecular model given in Figure 3D. The eicosyloxy group was oriented parallel to the main graphite axes. The calculations predict a small clockwise rotation of the 2-octyloxy group with respect to the eicosyloxy chain of 6°. No intermolecular interactions were considered in the calculation.