Using PVA for management despite uncertainty: Effects of habitat, hatcheries, harvest on salmon

Ecology

Volumn 84, Issue 6, 2003, Pages 1359-1369

  Ellner, Stephen P ^a   Fieberg, John ^b  

^a Department of Obstetrics Gynecology   (United States)

^b Northwest Indian Fisheries Commission   (United States)

Author keywords

Extinction risk; Population viability analysis; PVA; Salmon; Sensitivity analysis; Sobol' indices; Uncertainty

Indexed keywords

EXTINCTION RISK; FORECASTING METHOD; HATCHERY; SALMONID; UNCERTAINTY ANALYSIS;

ONCORHYNCHUS; ONCORHYNCHUS TSHAWYTSCHA; POTATO VIRUS A; SALMONIDAE;

EID: 0345570525     PISSN: 00129658     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1890/0012-9658(2003)084[1359:UPFMDU]2.0.CO;2     Document Type: Review

References (56)

1. Archer, G., A. Saltelli, and I. M. Sobol'. 1997. Sensitivity measures, ANOVA-like techniques and the use of the bootstrap. Journal of Statistical Computation and Simulation 58:99-120.
2. Beamesderfer, R. C. P., H. A. Schaller, M. P. Zimmerman, C. E. Petrosky, O. P. Langness, and L. LaVoy. 1997. Spawner-recruit data for spring and summer Chinook salmon populations in Idaho, Oregon, and Washington. In D. R. Marmorek and C. Peters, compilers and editors. PATH - plan for analyzing and testing hypotheses: report of retrospective analysis for fiscal year 1997. ESSA Technologies, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
3. Beissinger, S. R., and M. I. Westphal. 1998. On the use of demographic models of population viability in endangered species management. Journal of Wildlife Management 62: 821-841.
4. Boyce, M. 1992. Population viability analysis. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 23:481-506.
5. Burgman, M., and H. P. Possingham. 2000. Population viability analysis for conservation: the good, the bad and the undescribed. Pages 97-112 in A. G. Young and G. M. Clarke, editors. Genetics, demography and viability of fragmented populations. Cambridge University Press, London, UK.
6. Campolongo, F., S. Tarantola, and A. Saltelli. 1999. Tackling quantitatively large dimensionality problems. Computer Physics Communications 117:75-85.
7. Casella, G., and R. L. Berger. 1990. Statistical inference. Duxbury, Belmont, California, USA.
8. Caswell, H. 2001. Matrix population models: construction, analysis, and interpretation. Second edition. Sinauer, Sunderland, Massachusetts, USA.
9. Chan, K., A. Saltelli, and S. Tarantola. 2000. Winding stairs: a sampling tool to compute sensitivity indices. Statistics and Computing 10:187-196.
10. Cross, P., and S. R. Beissinger. 2001. Using logistic regression to analyze sensitivity of PVA models: a comparison of sensitivity methods using African Wild Dog models. Conservation Biology 15:1335-1346.
11. CTC (Chinook Technical Committee). 2001. Joint chinook technical committee report, annual exploitation rate analysis and model calibration. Pacific Salmon Commission, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
12. Davison, A. C., and D. V. Hinkley. 1997. Bootstrap methods and their application. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.
13. Dixon, P. M. 2001. The bootstrap and the jackknife: describing the precision of ecological studies. Pages 267-288 in S. Scheiner and J. Gurevitch, editors. Design and analysis of ecological experiments. Second edition. Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK.
14. Efron, B., and R. J. Tibshirani. 1993. An introduction to the bootstrap. Chapman and Hall, New York, New York, USA.
15. Ellner, S. P., B. A. Bailey, G. V. Bobashev, A. R. Gallant, B. T. Grenfell, and D. W. Nychka. 1998. Noise and nonlinearity in measles epidemics: combining mechanistic and statistical approaches to population modeling. American Naturalist 151:425-440.
16. Ellner, S. P., J. Fieberg, D. Ludwig, and C. Wilcox. 2002a. Precision of population viability analysis. Conservation Biology 16:258-261.
17. Ellner, S. P., Y. Seifu, and R. H. Smith. 2002b. Fitting population dynamic models to time series data by gradient matching. Ecology 83:2256-2270.
18. ESA (Ecological Society of America). 2001. Information to authors: how to prepare a manuscript. [Online, URL: 〈www.esapubs.org/esapubs/ authors_main.htm〉.]
19. Fieberg, J., and S. P. Ellner. 2000. When is it meaningful to estimate an extinction probability? Ecology 81:2040-2047.
20. Groom, M. J., and M. A. Pascual. 1998. The analysis of population persistence: an outlook on the practice of viability analysis. Pages 4-27 in P. L. Fielder and P. M. Kareiva, editors. Conservation biology. Chapman and Hall, New York, New York, USA.
21. Hilborn, R., B. G. Bue, and S. Sharr. 1999. Estimating spawning escapements from periodic counts: a comparison of methods. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 56:888-896.
22. Hilborn, R., and M. Mangel. 1997. The ecological detective. Princeton University Press, Princeton, New Jersey, USA.
23. Hinrichsen, R. A. 2002. The accuracy of alternative stochastic growth rate estimates for salmon populations. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 59:1014-1023.
24. Homma, T., and A. Saltelli. 1996. Importance measures in global sensitivity analysis of model output. Reliability Engineering and System Safety 52:1-17.
25. Jansen, M. J. 1999. Analysis of variance designs for model output. Computer Physics Communications 117:35-43.
26. Levin, P. S., R. W. Zabel, and J. G. Williams. 2001. The road to extinction is paved with good intentions: negative association of fish hatcheries with threatened salmon. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London Series B 268: 1153-1158.
27. Ludwig, D. 1999. Is it meaningful to estimate an extinction probability? Ecology 10:298-310.
28. Ludwig, D. 1996. Uncertainty and the assessment of extinction probabilities. Ecological Applications 6:1067-1076.
29. McCarthy, M. A., M. A. Burman, and S. Ferson. 1995. Sensitivity analysis for models of population viability. Biological Conservation 73:93-100.
30. McCarthy, M. A., M. A. Burgman, and S. Ferson. 1996. Logistic sensitivity and bounds for extinction risks. Ecological Modelling 86:297-303.
31. McClure, M., B. Sanderson, E. Holmes, C. Jordan, P, Kareiva, and P. Levin. 2000. A standardized quantitative analysis of the risks faced by salmonids in the Columbia River basin. National Marine Fisheries Service, Northwest Fisheries Science Center, Cumulative Risk Initiative Draft Report, Seattle, Washington, USA.
32. McElhany, P., M. H. Ruckelshaus, M. J. Ford, T. C. Wainwright, and E. P. Bjorkstedt. 2000. Viable salmonid populations and the recovery of evolutionarily significant units. U.S. Department of Commerce, NOAA Technical Memorandum NMFS-NWFSC-42.
33. McKay, M. D., J. D. Morrison, and S. C. Upton. 1999. Evaluating prediction uncertainty in simulation models. Computer Physics Communications 117:44-51.
34. Menges, E. 2000. Population viability analyses in plants: challenges and opportunities. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 15:51-56.
35. Mills, L. S., D. F. Doak, and M. J. Wisdom. 1999. Reliability of conservation actions based on elasticity analysis of matrix models. Conservation Biology 13:815-829.
36. Morris, W., D. Doak, M. Groom, P. Kareiva, J. Fieberg, L. Gerber, P. Murphy, and D. Thompson. 1999. A practical handbook for population viability analysis. Nature Conservancy, Arlington, Virginia, USA.
37. Oosterhout, G. R., and P. R. Mundy. 2001. The doomsday clock 2001: an update on the status and projected time to extinction for Snake River wild spring/summer Chinook stocks. Trout Unlimited, Portland, Oregon, USA.
38. Pastres, R., K. Chan, C. Solidoro, and C. Dejak. 1999. Global sensitivity analysis of a shallow-water 3D eutrophication model. Computer Physics Communications 117:62-74.
39. Paulsen, C. M., and T. R. Fisher. 2001. Statistical relationship between parr-to-smolt survival of Snake River spring-summer Chinook salmon and indices of land use. Transactions of the American Fisheries Society 130:347-358.
40. Petrosky, C. E., H. A. Schaller, and P. Budy. 2001. Productivity and survival rate trends in the freshwater spawning and rearing stage of Snake River Chinook salmon (Oncorhynchus tshawytscha). Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 58:1196-1207.
41. Possingham, H. P., D. B. Lindenmayer, and T. W. Norton. 1993. A framework for the improved management of threatened species based on populations viability analysis. Pacific Conservation Biology 1:39-45.
42. Reed, J. M., D. D. Murphy, and P. F. Brussard. 1998. Efficacy of population viability analysis. Wildlife Society Bulletin 26:244-251.
43. Sæther, B.-E., S. Engen, R. Lande, P. Arcese, and J. N. Smith. 2000. Estimating the time to extinction in an island population of song sparrows. Proceedings of the Royal Society London B Series 267:621-626.
44. Saltelli, A., T. H. Andres, and T. Homma. 1993. Sensitivity analysis of model output: an investigation of new techniques. Computational Statistics and Data Analysis 15: 211-238.
45. Saltelli, A., S. Tarantola, and F. Campolongo. 2000. Sensitivity analysis as an ingredient of modeling. Statistical Science 15:377-395.
46. Saltelli, A., S. Tarantola, and K. Chan. 1998. Presenting result from model based studies to decision makers: can sensitivity analysis be a defogging agent? Risk Analysis 18: 799-803.
47. Saltelli, A., S. Tarantola, and K. Chan. 1999. A quantitative model-independent method for global sensitivity analysis of model output. Technometrics 41:39-56.
48. Schaller, H. A., C. E. Petrosky, and O. P. Langness. 1999. Contrasting patterns of productivity and survival rates for stream-type Chinook salmon (Oncorhynchus tshawytscha) populations of the Snake and Columbia rivers. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 56:1031-1045.
49. Skalski, J. R. 1996. Regression of abundance estimates from mark-recapture surveys against environmental covariates. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 53: 196-204.
50. Sobol', I. M. 1993. Sensitivity analysis for nonlinear mathematical models. [In Russian.] Mathematical Modeling and Computational Experiment 1:407-414 [translation of Sobol', I. M. 1990. Sensitivity estimates for nonlinear mathematical models. Matematicheskoe Modelirovanie 2:112-118].
51. Sobol', I. M. 1993. Sensitivity analysis for nonlinear mathematical models. [In Russian.] Mathematical Modeling and Computational Experiment 1:407-414 [translation of Sobol', I. M. 1990. Sensitivity estimates for nonlinear mathematical models. Matematicheskoe Modelirovanie 2:112-118].
52. Theiler, J., S. Eubank, A. Longtin, B. Galdrikian, and J. D. Farmer. 1992b. Testing for nonlinearity in time series data: the method of surrogate data. Physica D 58:77-94.
53. Theiler, J., B. Galdrikian, A. Longtin, S. Eubank, and J. D. Farmer. 1992a. Using surrogate data to detect nonlinearity in time series. Pages 163-188 in M. Casdagli and S. Eubank, editors. Nonlinear modelling and forecasting. Santa Fe Institute, Addison Wesley, New York, New York, USA.
54. Thombs, L. A., and W. R. Schucany. 1990. Bootstrap prediction intervals for autoregression. Journal of the American Statistical Association 85:486-492.
55. Turchin, P., and S. P. Ellner. 2000. Living on the edge of chaos: population dynamics of Fennoscandian voles. Ecology 81:3099-3116.
56. Wood, S. N. 2001. Partially specified ecological models. Ecological Monographs 71:1-25.