Analysis of variance designs for model output

Computer Physics Communications

Volumn 117, Issue 1, 1999, Pages 35-43

  Jansen, Michiel J W ^a  

^a WAGENINGEN UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

RANDOM PROCESSES; SET THEORY; VECTORS;

LATIN HYPERCUBE SAMPLING; ORDINARY RANDOM SAMPLING; SCRAMBLED QUASI-RANDOM SAMPLING;

MATHEMATICAL MODELS;

EID: 0033097907     PISSN: 00104655     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0010-4655(98)00154-4     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. P. Bratley, B.L. Fox, Algorithm 659: implementing Sobol's quasirandom sequence generator, ACM Trans. Math. Software 14 (1988) 88-100.
2. R.I. Cukier, H.B. Levine, K.E. Shuler, Nonlinear sensitivity analysis of multiparameter model systems., J. Comput. Phys. 26 (1978) 1-42.
3. B. Efron, C. Stein, The jackknife estimate of variance, Ann. Stat. 9 (1981) 586-596.
4. R.L. Iman, W.J. Conover, A distribution-free approach to inducing rank correlation among input variables, Commun. Statist. Simul. Comput. 11 (1982) 311-334.
5. M.J.W. Jansen, W.A.H. Rossing, R.A. Daamen, Monte Carlo estimation of uncertainty contributions from several independent multivariate sources, in: J. Grasman, G. Van Strafen, eds., Predictability and Nonlinear Modelling in Natural Sciences and Economics (Kluwer, Dordrecht, 1994) pp. 334-343.
6. P.W.M. John, Statistical Design and Analysts of Experiments (MacMillan, New York, 1971).
7. B. Krzykacz, SAMOS: a computer program for the derivation of empirical sensitivity measures of results from large computer models, GRS-A-1700, Gesellschaft für Reaktorsicherheit, Garching (1990).
8. M.D. McKay, Variance-based methods for assessing uncertainty importance in NUREG-1150 analyses, Los Alamos National Laboratory, LA-UR-96-2695, Los Alamos (1996).
9. M.D. McKay, R.J. Beckman, W.J. Conover, A comparison of three methods for selecting values of input variables in the analysis of output from a computer code, Technometrics 21 (1979) 239-245.
10. H. Niederreiter, Random Number Generation and Quasi-Monte Carlo Methods (SIAM, Philadelphia, PA, 1992).
11. A.B. Owen, A central limit theorem for latin hypercube sampling, J.R. Statist. Soc. B 54 (1992) 541-551.
12. A.B. Owen, Scrambled net variance for integrals of smooth functions, Ann. Statist. 25 (1997) 1541-1562.
13. A. Robertson, Experimental design in the evaluation of genetic parameters. Biometrics 15 (1959) 219-226.
14. S.R. Searle, G. Casella, C.E. McCulloch, Variance Components (Wiley, New York, 1992).
15. I.M. Sobol', On the distribution of points in a cube and the approximate evaluation of integrals, USSR Comput. Math. Phys. 7 (1967) 86-112.
16. I.M. Sobol', Sensitivity estimates for nonlinear mathematical models, Matematicheskoe Modelirovanie 2 (1990) 112-118 [in Russian];
17. Translated in: Math. Model. & Comput. Exp. 1 (1993) 407-414.
18. [17| M. Stein, Large sample properties of simulations using latin hypercube sampling, Technometrics 29 (1987) 143-151.
19. S. Tarantola, A. Saltelli, K.P.S. Chan, Quantitative methods for global sensitivity analysis, in: R.M. Cooke, ed.. Report on Benchmark Workshop Uncertainty/Sensitivity Analysis Codes, European Safety and Reliability Association, Technical Committee on Uncertainty Modelling (1997).