The accuracy of alternative stochastic growth rate estimates for salmon populations

Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences

Volumn 59, Issue 6, 2002, Pages 1014-1023

  Hinrichsen, Richard A ^a  

^a Hinrichsen Environmental Services   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ACCURACY ASSESSMENT; BOOTSTRAPPING; ESTIMATION METHOD; GROWTH RATE; SALMONID;

SALMONIDAE;

EID: 0036381586     PISSN: 0706652X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1139/f02-065     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Barlow, J. 1990. A birth-interval model for estimating cetacean reproductive rates for resighting data. Rep. Int. Whal. Comm. (Spec. Issue), 12: 155-160.
2. Barlow, J., and Clapham, P.J. 1997. A new birth-interval approach to estimating demographic parameters of humpback whales. Ecology, 78: 535-546.
3. Beamesderfer, R.C.P., Petrosky, C.E., Schaller, H.A., and Langness, O. 1997. Spawner-recruit data for spring and summer chinook salmon populations in Idaho, Oregon, and Washington. In Plan for Analyzing and Testing Hypotheses (PATH): report of retrospective analysis for fiscal year 1997. Compiled and Edited by D.R. Marmorek and C. Peters. ESSA Technologies Ltd., Vancouver, B.C.
4. Beamish, R.J., Noakes, D.J., McFarlane, G.A., Klyashtorin, L., Ivanov, V.V., and Kurashov, V. 1999. The regime concept and natural trends in the production of Pacific salmon. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 56: 516-526.
5. Botsford, L.W., and Brittnacher, J.G. 1998. Viability of Sacramento River winter-run chinook salmon. Conserv. Biol. 12: 65-79.
6. Caswell, H. 2000. Matrix population models. 2nd ed. Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, Mass.
7. Caswell, H., Brault, S., Read, A.J., and Smith, T.D. 1998. Harbor porpoise and fisheries: an uncertainty analysis of incidental mortality. Ecol. Appl. 8: 1226-1238.
8. Coulson, T., Mace, G.M, Hudson, E., and Possingham, H. 2001. The use and abuse of population viability analysis. Trends Ecol. Evol. 16: 219-221.
9. Cumulative Risk Initiative. 2000. A standardized quantitative analysis of risks faced by salmonids in the Columbia River Basin. Cumulative Risk Initiative, Northwest Fisheries Science Center, NMFS-NOAA, 2725 Montlake Boulevard East, Seattle, Wash.
10. Dennis, B., Munholland, P.L, and Scott, J.M. 1991. Estimation of growth and extinction parameters for endangered species. Ecol. Monogr. 61: 115-143.
11. Deriso, R.B., Marmorek, D.R., and Parnell, I.J. 2001. Retrospective patterns of differential mortality and common year-effects experienced by spring and summer chinook salmon (Oncorhynchus tshawytscha) of the Columbia River. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 58: 2419-2430.
12. Efron, B., and Tibshirani, R.J. 1993. An introduction to the bootstrap. Chapman & Hall/CRC, New York.
13. Fieberg, J., and Ellner, S.P. 2000. When is it meaningful to estimate an extinction probability? Ecology, 81: 2040-2047.
14. Goodman, D. 2001. Managing Columbia Basin salmon: the facts, the questions, and the data. In What we don't know about Pacific Northwest fish runs. Proceedings of the Portland State University Salmon Symposium, Portland, Oreg., 7-8 July 2000. Edited by P. Koss and M. Katz. Portland State University, Portland, Oreg. pp. 5-23.
15. Hare, S.R., Mantua, N.J., and Francis, R.C. 1999. Inverse production regimes: Alaska and West Coast Pacific salmon. Fisheries (Bethesda), 24: 6-14.
16. Hilborn, R., and Starr, P.J. 1984. Making stock-recruitment work. In Proceedings of the workshop on stream indexing for salmon escapement estimation. Edited by P.E.K. Symons and M. Waldichuck. Can. Tech. Rep. Fish. Aquat. Sci. No. 1326. pp. 227-244.
17. Heyde, C.C., and Cohen, J.E. 1985. Confidence intervals for demographic projections based on products of random matrices. Theor. Popul. Biol. 27: 120-153.
18. Holmes, E.E. 2001. Estimating risks in declining populations with poor data. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 98: 5072-5077.
19. Kareiva, P., Marvier, M., and McClure, M. 2000. Recovery and management options for spring/summer chinook salmon in the Columbia River Basin. Science (Washington, D.C.), 290: 977-979.
20. Lande, R., and Orzack, S.H. 1988. Extinction dynamics of age-structured populations in a fluctuating environment. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 85: 7418-7421.
21. Leslie, P.H. 1948. Some further notes on the use of matrices in population mathematics. Biometrika, 35: 213-245.
22. Ludwig, D. 1999. Is it meaningful to estimate a probability of extinction? Ecology, 80: 298-310.
23. Press, W.H., Teukolsky, S.A., Vetterling, W.T., and Flannery, B.P. 1992. Numerical recipes in FORTRAN. Cambridge University Press, New York.
24. Rajarshi, M.B. 1990. Bootstrap in Markov-sequences based on estimates of transition density. Ann. Inst. Statist. Math. 42: 253-268.
25. Schaller, H.A., Petrosky, C.E., and Langness, O.P. 1999. Contrasting patterns of productivity and survival rates for stream-type chinook salmon (Oncorhynchus tshawytscha) populations of the Snake and Columbia rivers. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 56: 1031-1045.
26. Tuljapurkar, S.D. 1989. An uncertain life: demography in random environments. Theor. Popul. Biol. 35: 227-294.
27. Tuljapurkar, S.D., and Orzack, S.H. 1980. Population dynamics in variable environments. I. Long-run growth rates and extinction. Theor. Popul. Biol. 18: 314-342.