Rearrangements and chromosomal evolution

Current Opinion in Genetics and Development

Volumn 13, Issue 6, 2003, Pages 583-587

  Sankoff, David ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF OTTAWA   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ALGORITHM; CHROMOSOME BREAKAGE; CHROMOSOME REARRANGEMENT; EUKARYOTE; GENE LOSS; GENE REARRANGEMENT; GENE SEQUENCE; GENE STRUCTURE; GENE TRANSFER; GENETIC LINKAGE; HUMAN; MATHEMATICAL MODEL; MOLECULAR EVOLUTION; NONHUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROKARYOTE; QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS; REVIEW;

EUKARYOTA; PROKARYOTA;

EID: 0345447448     PISSN: 0959437X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.gde.2003.10.006     Document Type: Review

References (55)

1. Sankoff D, Nadeau JH (Eds): Comparative Genomics: Gene Order Dynamics, Map Alignment and the Evolution of Gene Families. Dordrecht, NL: Kluwer; 2000.
2. Sankoff D, El-Mabrouk N: Genome rearrangement. In Current Topics in Computational Biology. Edited by Jiang T, Smith T, Xu Y, Zhang M. Cambridge, MA: Massachusetts Institute of Technology Press; 2002:135-155.
3. Gonzalez J., Ranz J.M., Ruiz A. Chromosomal elements evolve at different rates in the Drosophila genome. Genetics. 161:2002;1137-1154.
4. Sharakhov I.V., Serazin A.C., Grushko O.G., Dana A., Lobo N., Hillenmeyer M.E., Westerman R., Romero-Severson J., Costantini C., Sagnon N.et al. Inversions and gene order shuffling in Anopheles gambiae and A. funestus. Science. 298:2002;182-185.
5. Zdobnov E.M., von Mering C., Letunic I., Torrents D., Suyama M., Copley R.R., Christophides G.K., Thomasova D., Holt R.A., Subramanian G.M.et al. Comparative genome and proteome analysis of Anopheles gambiae and Drosophila melanogaster. Science. 298:2002;149-159.
6. Coghlan A., Wolfe K.H. Fourfold faster rate of genome rearrangement in nematodes than in Drosophila. Genome Res. 12:2002;857-867.
7. Gardner M.J., Hall N., Fung E., White O., Berriman M., Hyman R.W., Carlton J.M., Pain A., Nelson K.E., Bowman S.et al. Genome sequence of the human malaria parasite Plasmodium falciparum. Nature. 419:2002;498-511.
8. Katinka M.D., Duprat S., Cornillot E., Metenier G., Thomarat F., Prensier G., Barbe V., Peyretaillade E., Brottier P., Wincker P.et al. Genome sequence and gene compaction of the eukaryote parasite Encephalitozoon cuniculi. Nature. 414:2001;450-453.
9. Kellis M., Patterson N., Endrizzi M., Birren B., Lander E.S. Sequencing and comparison of yeast species to identify genes and regulatory elements. Nature. 423:2003;241-254.
10. Seoighe C., Federspiel N., Jones T., Hansen N., Bivolarovic V., Surzycki R., Tamse R., Komp C., Huizar L., Davis R.W.et al. Prevalence of small inversions in yeast gene order evolution. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 97:2000;14433-14437.
11. McLysaght A, Seoighe C, Wolfe KH: High frequency of inversions during eukaryote gene order evolution. In Comparative Genomics. Edited by Sankoff D, Nadeau JH. Dordrecht NL: Kluwer Academic Press; 2000:47-58.
12. Pevzner P., Tesler G. Human and mouse genomic sequences reveal extensive breakpoint reuse in mammalian evolution. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 100:2003;7672-7677 A breakthrough in adapting rearrangement algorithms to nuclear genomes, bypassing gene-finding and ortholog identifications. These findings are suggestive of new directions for modeling, algorithms, and further comparative sequencing.
13. Bailey J.A., Gu Z., Clark R.A., Reinert K., Samonte R.V., Schwartz S., Adams M.D., Myers E.W., Li P.W., Eichler E.E. Recent segmental duplications in the human genome. Science. 297:2002;1003-1007 An assessment of the particular role of segmental duplications in recent primate history. These are associated with gene diversification, regions of genomic instability and genetic disease.
14. Mefford HC, Trask BJ: The complex structure and dynamic evolution of human subtelomeres. Nat Rev Genet 2002, 3:91-102. [Published erratum appears in Nat Rev Genet 2002, 3:229.].
15. Samonte R.V., Eichler E.E. Segmental duplications and the evolution of the primate genome. Nat Rev Genet. 3:2002;65-72.
16. Thomas J.W., Schueler M.G., Summers T.J., Blakesley R.W., McDowell J.C., Thomas P.J., Idol J.R., Maduro V.V., Lee-Lin S.Q., Touchman J.W.et al. Pericentromeric duplications in the laboratory mouse. Genome Res. 13:2003;55-63.
17. Salse J., Piegu B., Cooke R., Delseny M. Synteny between Arabidopsis thaliana and rice at the genome level: a tool to identify conservation in the ongoing rice genome sequencing project. Nucleic Acids Res. 30:2002;2316-2328.
18. Wong S., Butler G., Wolfe K.H. Gene order evolution and paleopolyploidy in hemiascomycete yeasts. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 99:2002;9272-9277.
19. Bowers J.E., Chapman B.A., Rong J., Paterson A.H. Unravelling angiosperm genome evolution by phylogenetic analysis of chromosomal duplication events. Nature. 422:2003;433-438.
20. Hughes A.L., Friedman R. 2R or not 2R: testing hypotheses of genome duplication in early vertebrates. J Struct Funct Genomics. 3:2003;85-93.
21. Gu X., Wang Y., Gu J. Age distribution of human gene families shows significant roles of both large- and small-scale duplications in vertebrate evolution. Nat Genet. 31:2002;205-209.
22. Hokamp K., McLysaght A., Wolfe K.H. The 2R hypothesis and the human genome sequence. J Struct Funct Genomics. 3:2003;95-110 An account of the current status of the genome doubling controversy pertaining to the vertebrate lineage, with critique of both phylogeny-based and map-based arguments. The authors use a whole-genome approach (at the gene-order level) to establish the likelihood of a tetraploidization event early in vertebrate history.
23. McLysaght A., Hokamp K., Wolfe K.H. Extensive genomic duplication during early chordate evolution. Nat Genet. 31:2002;200-204.
24. Durand D. Vertebrate evolution: doubling and shuffling with a full deck. Trends Genet. 19:2003;2-5.
25. Hsiao W., Wan I., Jones S.J., Brinkman F.S. IslandPath: aiding detection of genomic islands in prokaryotes. Bioinformatics. 19:2003;418-420.
26. Lander E.S., Linton L.M., Birren B., Nusbaum C., Zody M.C., Baldwin J., Devon K., Dewar K., Doyle M., FitzHugh W.et al. Initial sequencing and analysis of the human genome. Nature. 409:2001;860-921.
27. Salzberg S.L., White O., Peterson J., Eisen J.A. Microbial genes in the human genome: lateral transfer or gene loss? Science. 292:2001;1903-1906.
28. Doolittle W.F., Boucher Y., Nesbo C.L., Douady C.J., Andersson J.O., Roger A.J. How big is the iceberg of which organellar genes in nuclear genomes are but the tip? Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 358:2003;39-57.
29. Kunin V., Ouzounis C.A. The balance of driving forces during genome evolution in prokaryotes. Genome Res. 13:2003;1589-1594.
30. Amor D.J., Choo K.H. Neocentromeres: role in human disease, evolution, and centromere study. Am J Hum Genet. 71:2002;695-714.
31. Tamames J: Evolution of gene order conservation in prokaryotes. Genome Biol 2001, 2:RESEARCH0020.
32. Durand D., Sankoff D. Testing for gene clusters. J Comput Biol. 10:2003;453-482.
33. Bergeron A, Corteel S, Raffinot M: The algorithmic of gene teams. In Algorithms in Bioinformatics, Proceedings of the Second International Workshop. Edited by Gusfield D, Guigo R. Berlin: Springer Lecture Notes in Computer Science 2452; 2002:464-476.
34. Sankoff D. Short inversions and conserved gene clusters. Bioinformatics. 18:2002;1305-1308.
35. Lefebvre J.-F., El-Mabrouk N., Tillier E., Sankoff D. Detection and validation of single-gene inversions. Bioinformatics. 19:2003;i190-i196.
36. Bader D.A., Moret B.M., Yan M. A linear-time algorithm for computing inversion distance between signed permutations with an experimental study. J Comput Biol. 8:2001;483-491.
37. Bergeron A: A very elementary presentation of the Hannenhalli-Pevzner theory. Discrete Applied Mathematics 2003, in press.
38. Tesler G. GRIMM: genome rearrangements web server. Bioinformatics. 18:2002;492-493.
39. El-Mabrouk N. Sorting signed permutations by reversals and insertions/deletions of contiguous segments. J Discrete Algorithms. 1:2001;105-122.
40. Marron M, Swenson KM, Moret BME: Genomic distances under deletions and insertions. Proceedings of COCOON, the Ninth International Computing and Combinatorics Conference: 2003; Berlin: Springer Lecture Notes in Computer Science; 2697:537-547.
41. Sankoff D. Genome rearrangement with gene families. Bioinformatics. 15:1999;909-917.
42. Bourque G., Pevzner P.A. Genome-scale evolution: reconstructing gene orders in the ancestral species. Genome Res. 12:2002;26-36.
43. Tang J., Moret B.M.E. Scaling up accurate phylogenetic reconstruction from gene-order data. Bioinformatics. 19:2003;i305-i312 The authors review ongoing efforts to develop rearrangement-based phylogenetics and report on experiments to infer larger trees.
44. Sankoff D, Blanchette M: Comparative genomics via phylogenetic invariants for Jukes-Cantor semigroups. In Stochastic Models: A Conference in Honour of Professor Donald A Dawson. Edited by Gorostiza LG, Ivanoff BG. Providence, RI: American Mathematical Society; 2000:399-418.
45. Wang LS: Genome rearrangement phylogeny using Weighbor. In Algorithms in Bioinformatics, Proceedings of the Second International Workshop. Edited by Gusfield D, Guigo R. Berlin: Springer Lecture Notes in Computer Science 2452; 2002:112-125.
46. York T.L., Durrett R., Nielsen R. Bayesian estimation of the number of inversions in the history of two chromosomes. J Comput Biol. 9:2002;805-818.
47. Miklós I: MCMC genome rearrangement. Bioinformatics 2003, in press.
48. El-Mabrouk N., Sankoff D. The reconstruction of doubled genomes. SIAM J Computing. 32:2003;754-792.
49. Sankoff D, Parent MN, Bryant D: Accuracy and robustness of analyses based on numbers of genes in observed segments. In Comparative Genomics: Gene Order Dynamics, Map Alignment and the Evolution of Gene Families. Edited by Sankoff D, Nadeau JH. Dordrecht, NL: Kluwer; 2000:299-306.
50. Housworth E.A., Postlethwait J. Measures of synteny conservation between species pairs. Genetics. 162:2002;441-448.
51. Sankoff D., Deneault M., Turbis P., Allen C.P. Chromosomal distributions of breakpoints in cancer, infertility and evolution. Theor Popul Biol. 61:2002;497-501.
52. Pevzner PA, Raphael B: Genome rearrangements in tumor cells: reconstructing tumor genome architecture. Bioinformatics 2003, in press.
53. 7 bp. An illustration of the power of the UCSC genome browser.
54. Pal C., Hurst L.D. Evidence for co-evolution of gene order and recombination rate. Nat Genet. 33:2003;392-395.
55. Lercher M.J., Urrutia A.O., Hurst L.D. Clustering of housekeeping genes provides a unified model of gene order in the human genome. Nat Genet. 31:2002;180-183 A systematic approach to questions of functional non-randomness in gene order, suggesting that genes cluster according to tissue-specific expression patterns.