Measures of synteny conservation between species pairs

Genetics

Volumn 162, Issue 1, 2002, Pages 441-448

  Housworth, Elizabeth Ann ^a,b   Postlethwait, John ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF OREGON   (United States)

^b INDIANA UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CHROMOSOME 1; CHROMOSOME PAIRING; GENETIC CONSERVATION; GENOME; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SPECIES DIFFERENTIATION;

EVOLUTION; MODELS, GENETIC; MULTIVARIATE ANALYSIS;

EID: 0036741566     PISSN: 00166731     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. Bengtsson, B. O., K. K. Levan and G. Levan, 1993 Measuring genome reorganization from synteny data. Cytogenet. Cell Genet. 64: 198-200.
2. BovBase, 2001 The Roslin Institute, Edinburgh (http:www.d.bbsrc.ac.uk/bovmap/arkbov/), July 28, 2001.
3. Cramér, H., 1946 Mathematical Methods of Statistics. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ.
4. Ehrlich, J. D. Sankoff and J. H. Nadeau, 1997 Synteny conservation and chromosome rearrangements during mammalian evolution. Genetics 147: 289-296.
5. Feller, W., 1968 An Introduction to Probability Theory and Its Applications, Vol. I. John Wiley & Sons, New York.
6. Fisher, R. A., 1938 Statistical Method for Research Workers. Oliver and Boyd, Edinburgh.
7. Fridstedt, B., and L. Gray, 1997 A Modern Approach to Probability Theory. Birkhäuser, Boston.
8. Goodman, L. A., and W. H. Kruskal, 1954 Measures of association for cross classifications. J. Am. Stat. Assoc. 49: 732-764.
9. Graur, D., and W.-H. Li, 2000 Fundamentals of Molecular Evolution. Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, MA.
10. Guttman, L., 1941 An outline of the statistical theory of prediction. Supplementary study B-1, pp. 253-318 in The Prediction of Personal Adjustment, edited by P. Horst, P. Wallin and L. Guttman. Bulletin 48, Social Science Research Council, New York.
11. Hannenhalli, S., C. Chappey, E. V. Koonin and P. A. Pevzner, 1995 Genome sequence comparison and scenarios for gene rearrangements: a test case. Genomics 30: 299-311.
12. Kumar, S., and S. B. Hedges, 1999 A molecular timescale for vertebrate evolution. Nature 392: 917-920.
13. Kumar, S., S. R. Gadackar, A. Filipski and X. Gu, 2001 Determina tion of the number of conserved chromosomal segments between species. Genetics 157: 1387-1395.
14. Mouse Genome Database (MGB), 2001 Mouse Genome Informatics Web Site, The Jackson Laboratory, Bar Harbor ME (http://informatics.ja.x.org/), July 28, 2001.
15. Murphy, W. J., S. Sun, Z. Chen, N. Yuhki, D. Hirschmann et al., 2000 A radiation hybrid map of the cat genome: implications for comparative mapping. Genome Res., 10: 691-702.
16. Nadeau, J. H., and D. Sankoff, 1998 Counting on comparative maps. Trends Genet. 14: 495-501.
17. Sankoff, D., and J. H. Nadeau, 1996 Conserved synteny as a measure of genome rearrangement. Discrete Appl. Math. 71: 247-257.
18. Sankoff, D., G. Leduc, N. Antoine, B. Paquin, B. F. Lang et al., 1992 Gene order comparisons for phylogenetic inference: evolution of tile mitochondrial genome. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 89:6575-6579.
19. Sankoff, D., M.-N. Parent, I. Marchland and V. Ferretti, 1997 On the Nadeau-Taylor theory of conserved chromosome segments, pp. 262-274 in Combinatorial Pattern Matching. Eighth Annual Symposium edited by A. Apostolico and J. Hein. Lecture Notes in Computer Science 1264, Springer Verlag, Berlin.
20. Waddington, D., A. Springbett and D. W. Burt, 1999 A chromo some-based model for estimating the number of conserved segments between pairs of species from comparative genetic maps. Genetics 154: 323-332.
21. Zakharov, I. A., and A. K. Valeev, 1988 Quantitative analysis of evolution of mammalian genomes by comparison of genetic maps. Proc. Acad. Sci. USSR 301: 1213-1218. Genetika 28: 77-81.
22. Zakharov, I. A., and A. K. Valeev, 1988 Quantitative analysis of evolution of mammalian genomes by comparison of genetic maps. Proc. Acad. Sci. USSR 301: 1213-1218. Genetika 28: 77-81.