Women's Views of the Factors that Encourage and Discourage Classroom Participation

Journal of College Student Development

Volumn 44, Issue 6, 2003, Pages 831-844

  Salter, Daniel W ^a   Persaud, Anita ^a  

^a PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0344685372     PISSN: 08975264     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1353/csd.2003.0077     Document Type: Review

References (39)

1. Bischoping, K., & Bell, S. (1998). Gender and contradictory definitions of university accessibility. The Review of Higher Education, 21(2), 179-194.
2. Briggs, K. C., & Myers, I. B. (1998). The Myers-Briggs Type Indicator-Form M. Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press.
3. Carskadon, T. G. (1994). Student personality factors: Psychological type and the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator. In K. W. Prichard & R. McLaran Sawyer (Eds.), Handbook of college teaching: Theory and applications (pp. 68-81). Westport, CT: Greenwood Press.
4. Dillon, J. T. (1982). Male-female similarities in class participation. Journal of Educational Research, 75, 350-353.
5. Drew, T. L., & Work, G. G. (1998). Gender-based differences in perception of experiences in higher education: Gaining a broader perspective. Journal of Higher Education, 65, 542-555.
6. Evans, N. J., Forney, D. S., & Guido-DiBrito, F. (1998). Student development in college: Theory, research and practice. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
7. Ferguson, M. (1992). Is the classroom still a chilly climate for women? College Student Journal, 26, 507-511.
8. Fritschner, L. M. (2000). Inside the undergraduate college classroom: Faculty and students differ on the meaning of student participation. Journal of Higher Education, 71, 342-362.
9. Hall, R., & Sandler, B. (1982). The classroom climate: A chilly one for women? Project on the Status and Education of Women. Washington, DC: Association of American Colleges.
10. Heller, J. F., Puff, C. R., & Mills, C. J. (1985). Assessment of the chilly college climate for women. Journal of Higher Education, 55, 446-461.
11. Jensen, G. H. (1987). Learning styles. In J. Provost & S. Anchors (Eds.), Applications of the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator in higher education (pp. 181-206). Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press.
12. Jung, C. G. (1971). Psychological types. (H. G. Baynes, trans.; R. F. C. Hull, rev. trans.). Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. (Original work published 1921).
13. Karp, D. A., & Yoels, W. C. (1975). The college classroom: Some observations on the meanings of student participation. Journal of Sociology and Social Research, 60, 421-439.
14. Krupnick, C. G. (1985). Women and men in the classroom: Inequality and its remedies. On Teaching & Learning, 1, 18-25.
15. Kuh, G., Schuh, J. H., & Whitt, E. J. (1991). Involving colleges. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
16. Lease, S. H., & Schmeck, R. R. (1990). The relationship of gender and gender identification to classroom participation. College Student Journal, 24, 392-398.
17. McCaulley, M. H. (2000). The Myers-Briggs Type Indicator in counseling. In C. E. Watkins, Jr., & V. L. Campbell (Eds.), Testing and assessment in counseling practice (2nd ed., pp. 111-173). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
18. Miller, C. D., Finley, J., & McKinley, D. L. (1990). Learning approaches and motives: Male and female differences and implications for learning assistance programs. Journal of College Student Development, 31, 147-154.
19. Mischel, W. (1977). The interaction of person and situation. In D. Magnusson & N. S. Endler (Eds.), Personality at the crossroads (pp. 333-352). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
20. Myers, I. B., McCaulley, M. H., Quenk, N. L., & Hammer, Al. L. (1998). MBTI manual: A guide to the development and use of the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator (3rd. ed.). Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press.
21. Myers, I. B., & Myers, P. B. (1980). Gifts differing. Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press.
22. Pascarella, E. T., Whitt, E. J., Edison, M. I., Nora, A., Hagedorn, L. S., Yeager, P. M., et al. (1997). Women's perceptions of a "chilly climate" and their cognitive outcomes during the first year of college. Journal of College Student Development, 38, 109-124.
23. Persaud, A. (1999). Gender inequity in today's college classroom: Understanding women's participation. Unpublished manuscript, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA.
24. Persaud, A., & Salter, D. W. (2003). Understanding women's perceptions of classroom "fit" and participation as interactions between psychological and environmental types. Journal of Classroom Interaction, 38(2), 1-10.
25. Richardson, J. T., & King, E. (1991). Gender differences in the experience of higher education: Quantitative and qualitative approaches. Educational Psychology, 11, 363-382.
26. Sadker, M., & Sadker, D. (1994). Failing at fairness: How our schools cheat girls. New York: Touchstone Press.
27. Salter, D. W. (1996). Psychological and environmental type congruence in educational settings. Proceedings of International Symposium: Quality Education-Evolution and Revolution (pp. 195-197). Gainesville, FL: Center for Applications of Psychological Type.
28. Salter, D. W. (1998). Salter Environmental type Assessment-Research Form A2. Unpublished research instrument.
29. Salter, D. W. (2000a). Gender bias issues in the college classroom: A study of the interactions between psychological and environmental types. Initiatives, 59(2). Retrieved November 13, 2000 from http://www.nawe.org
30. Salter, D. W. (2000b). SETA Manual: A user's guide to the Salter Environmental Type Assessment. Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press.
31. Salter, D. W. (2000c). The Salter Environmental Type Assessment - Experimental Form B. Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press.
32. Salter, D. W. (2003). Exploring the "chilly" classroom phenomenon as interactions between psychological and environmental types. Journal of College Student Development, 44, 110-121.
33. Salter, D. W. (in press a). A generalizability study of Salter Environmental Type Assessment scores by environmental domain. Measurement and Evaluation in Counseling and Development.
34. Salter, D. W. (in press b). Testing the Attraction-Selection-Attrition model of organizational functioning: The personality of the professoriate. Journal of Psychological Type.
35. Salter, D. W., Junco, R., & Irvin, D. S. (in press). Campus social climate correlates of environmental type dimensions. NASPA Journal.
36. Salter, D. W., & Vandiver, B. J. (2002). Overview of the taxonomy of environmental types and the factor structure of the Salter Environmental Type Assessment. Journal of College Student Development, 43, 892-905.
37. Sandler, B. R., Silverberg, L. A., & Hall, R. M. (1996). The chilly classroom climate: A guide to improve the education of women. Washington, DC: The National Association for Women in Education.
38. Seymour, E., & Hewitt, N. M. (1997). Talking about leaving: Why undergraduates leave the sciences. Colorado: Westview Press.
39. Speth, C., & Brown, R. (1990). Effects of college students' learning styles and gender on their test preparation strategies. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 4(3), 189-202.