Exploring the "Chilly Classroom" Phenomenon as Interactions Between Psychological and Environmental Types

Journal of College Student Development

Volumn 44, Issue 1, 2003, Pages 110-121

  Salter, Daniel W ^a  

^a PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0141865591     PISSN: 08975264     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1353/csd.2003.0009     Document Type: Review

References (62)

1. Anchors, W. S., Robbins, M. A., & Gershman, E. S. (1989). The relationship between Jungian type and persistence to graduation among college students. Journal of Psychological Type, 17, 20-25.
2. Apostal, R., & Trontvent, R. (1989). College students' academic comfort and personality. Journal of College Student Development, 30, 210-212.
3. Belenky, M. F., Clinchy, B. M., Goldberger, N. R., & Tarule, J. M. (1986). Women's ways of knowing: The development of self, voice, and mind. New York: Basic Books.
4. Brown, R. (1978). The effects of congruency between learning style and teaching style on college student achievement. College Student Journal, 12, 307-309.
5. Carry, A. (1999). The effects of learning styles awareness and knowledge of instructional models on the study habits of college students at-risk for academic failure. Dissertation Abstracts International, 60 (02), 354A. (UMI No. 95015081)
6. Carskadon, T. G. (1994). Student personality factors: Psychological type and the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator. In K. W. Prichard & R. M. Sawyer (Eds.), Handbook of college teaching: Theory and applications (pp. 68-81). Westport, CT: Greenwood Press.
7. Cook, J. R. (1987). Anticipatory person-environment fit as a predictor of college student health and adjustment. Journal of College Student Personnel, 28, 210-212.
8. Cooper, S. E., & Miller, J. A. (1991). MBTI learning styleteaching style discongruencies. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 51, 699-707.
9. Craik, K. H. (1981). Environmental assessment and situational analysis. In D. Magnusson (Ed.), Toward a psychology of situations (pp. 37-48). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
10. Drew, T. L., & Work, G. G. (1998). Gender-based differences in perception of experiences in higher education: Gaining a broader perspective. Journal of Higher Education, 65, 542-555.
11. Dunn, R., & Stevenson, J. M. (1997). Teaching diverse college students to study with a learning-styles prescription. College Student Journal, 31, 333-339.
12. Evans, N. J., Forney, D. S., & Guido-DiBrito, F. (1998). Student development in college: Theory, research, and practice. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
13. Ferguson, M. (1992). Is the classroom still a chilly climate for women? College Student Journal, 26, 507-511.
14. Fried, J. (1994), In groups, out groups, paradigms, and perceptions. In J. Fried (Ed.), Different voices: Gender and perspective in student affairs administration. Washington, DC: National Association of Student Personnel Administrators.
15. Gilligan, C. (1982). In a different voice: Psychological theory and women's development. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
16. Hammer, A. L. (1996). MBTI applications: A decade of research on the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator. Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press.
17. Hinkle, D. E., Austin, J. T., & McLaughlin, G. W. (1989). Log-linear models: Applications in higher education research. In J. C. Smart (Ed.), Higher education: Handbook of theory and research (pp. 323-353). New York: Agathon.
18. Jung, C. G. (1971). Psychological types. (H. G. Baynes, Trans., revised by R. F. C. Hull). Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. (Original work published 1921)
19. Kalsbeek, D. (1987) Campus retention: The MBTI in institutional self-studies. In J. A. Provost & S. Anchors (Eds.), Applications of Myers-Briggs Type Indicator in higher education (pp. 31-64). Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press.
20. Kennedy, J. J. (1992). The analysis of qualitative data: Introductory log-linear analysis for behavioral researchers (2nd ed.). New York: Praeger.
21. Lacina, L. J. (1991). Empowering students in the college classroom through learning styles research. College Student Journal, 25, 354-355.
22. Lawrence, G. (1993). People types and tiger stripes: A practical guide to learning styles (3rd ed.). Gainesville, FL: Center for the Applications of Psychological Type.
23. Lenehan, M., Lenehan, M. C., Dunn, R. S., & Ingham, J. (1994). Effects of learning-style intervention on college students' achievement, anxiety, anger, and curiosity. Journal of College Student Development, 35, 461-466.
24. Leslie, D. W. (2002). Resolving the dispute: Teaching is academe's core value. Journal of Higher Education, 73, 49-73.
25. Little, B. R. (1987). Personality and the environment. In D. Stokols & I. Altman (Eds.), Handbook of environmental psychology (pp. 205-244). New York: Wiley.
26. Lynch, A. Q., & Sellers, P. A. (1996). Preferences for different educational environments and psychological type: A comparison of adult learners and traditional age college students. Journal of Psychological Type, 39, 18-29.
27. Miller, C. D., Finley, J., & McKinley, D. L. (1990). Learning approaches and motives: Male and female differences and implications for learning assistance programs. Journal of College Student Development, 31, 147-154.
28. Moody, J. (1989). Type and moral development: Kohlberg and Gilligan. Journal of Psychological Type, 18, 11-13.
29. Murray, H. (1938). Explorations in personality. New York: Oxford University Press.
30. Myers, I. B. (1987). The Myers-Briggs Type Indicator-Form G. Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press.
31. Myers, I. B., McCaulley, M. H., Quenk, N. L., & Hammer, A. L. (1998). MBTI manual: A guide to the development and use of the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator (3rd. ed.). Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press.
32. Myers, I. B., & Myers, P. B. (1980). Gifts Differing. Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press.
33. Nelson, B., Dunn, R., Griggs, S. A., Primavera, L., Fitzpatrick, M., Bacilious, Z., et al. (1993). Effects of learning style intervention on college students' retention and achievement. Journal of College Student Development, 34, 364-369.
34. Netter, P. (1996). Prediction CFA as a search for types. Applied Psychology: An International Review, 45, 338-344.
35. Otis, G. D., & Quenk, N. L. (1989). Care and justice considerations in "real" life moral problems. Journal of Psychological Type, 18, 3-10.
36. O'Shea, T., & Mamchur, C. (1989). Using a loglinear model to analyze MBTI distributions. Journal of Psychological Type, 17, 45-55.
37. Pascarella, E. T., & Terenzini, P. T. (1991). How college affects students: Findings and insights from 20 years of research. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
38. Pascarella, E. T., Whitt, E. J., Edison, M. I., Nora, A., Hagedorn, L. S., Yeager, P. M., et al. (1997). Women's perceptions of a "chilly climate" and their cognitive outcomes during the first year of college. Journal of College Student Development, 38, 109-124.
39. Persaud, A. (1999). Gender inequity in today's college classroom: Understanding women's participation. Unpublished manuscript. The Pennsylvania State University, University Park.
40. Persaud, A., & Salter, D. W. (2002). Women's views of the factors that encourage and discourage classroom participation. Manuscript submitted for publication.
41. Provost, J. A., & Anchors, S. (1987). Applications of Myers-Briggs Type Indicator in higher education. Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press.
42. Richardson, J. T., & King, E. (1991). Gender differences in the experience of higher education: Quantitative and qualitative approaches, Educational Psychology, 11, 363-382.
43. Sadker, D. (2000). Gender equity: Still knocking at the classroom door. Equity and Excellence in Education, 35(1), 80-83.
44. Sadker, M., & Sadker, D. (1994). Failing at fairness: How America's schools cheat girls. New York: Charles Scribner's Sons.
45. Salter, D. W. (1996). Psychological and environmental type congruence in educational settings. Proceedings: Quality Education: Evolution and Revolution-The Role of Psychological Type, 195-197.
46. Salter, D. W. (1998). Salter Environmental Type Assessment-Research Form Al. (Available from D. W. Salter, 330 CEDAR Building, University Park, PA 16802).
47. Salter, D. W. (1999, March). Using the Salter Environmental Type Assessment in higher education settings. Paper presented at the ACPA Conference, Atlanta, GA.
48. Salter, D. W. (2000a). SETA manual: A users' guide to the Salter Environmental Type Assessment. Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press.
49. Salter, D. W. (2000b). The Salter Environmental Type Assessment-Experimental Form B. Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press.
50. Salter, D. W. (2000c). Gender bias issues in the college classroom: A study of the interactions between psychological and environmental types. Initiatives, 59(2). Retrieved November 13,2000 from http://www.nawe.org
51. Salter, D. W. (2002). A validity study of the Salter Environmental Type Assessment. Journal of Career Assessment, 10, 428-440.
52. Sandler, B. R., Silverberg, L. A., & Hall, R. M. (1996). The chilly classroom climate: A guide to improve the education of women. Washington, DC: National Association for Women in Education.
53. Schneider, B. (2001). Fits about fit. Applied Psychology: An International Review, 50, 141-152.
54. Schroeder, C. C., DiTiberio, J. K., & Kalsbeek, D. H. (1989). Bridging the gap between faculty and students: Opportunities and obligations for student affairs. NASPA Journal, 26, 14-20.
55. Schurr, K. T., Ruble, V. E., Palomba, C., Pickerill, B., & Moore, D. (1997). Relationship between the MBTI and selected aspects of Tinto's model for college attrition. Journal of Psychological Type, 40, 31-42.
56. Speth, C., & Brown, R. (1990). Effects of college students' learning styles and gender on their test preparation strategies. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 4(3), 189-202.
57. Stokes, J. (1987). Exploring the relationship of type and gender (Part 1): Anecdotal experiences of MBTI users. Journal of Psychological Type, 13, 34-43.
58. Strange, C. (1994). Student development: The evolution and status of an essential idea. Journal of College Student Development, 35, 399-443.
59. Tannen, D. (1990). You just don't understand: Women and men in conversation. New York: Random House.
60. Ullman-Petrash, L. (2000). The thinking-feeling scale and separate and connected ways of knowing. Journal of Psychological Type, 52, 36-40.
61. von Eye, A. (2002). Configural frequency analysis: Methods, models, and applications. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
62. Winkel, G. H. (1985). Ecological validity issues in field research settings. In A. Baum & J. E. Singer (Eds.), Advances in ecological psychology, Vol. 5: Methods and environmental psychology (pp. 1-41). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.