In vivo evaluation of a moisture-activated orthodontic adhesive: A comparative clinical trial

Orthodontics and Craniofacial Research

Volumn 5, Issue 3, 2002, Pages 170-178

  Karamouzos, Athanasios E ^a   Mavropoulos, A ^a   Athanasiou, A E ^a   Kolokithas, G ^a  

^a ARISTOTLE UNIVERSITY OF THESSALONIKI   (Greece)

Author keywords

Moisture active adhesive; Orthodontic bonding; Randomized controlled trial

Indexed keywords

2 CYANOACRYLIC ACID ETHYL ESTER; ADHESIVE AGENT; CYANOACRYLATE DERIVATIVE; ETHYL 2-CYANOACRYLATE; RESIN; RESIN CEMENT; SMARTBOND; STAINLESS STEEL; SYSTEM 1 PLUS; WATER;

ARTICLE; CANINE TOOTH; CHEMISTRY; CLINICAL TRIAL; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; DENTAL BONDING; EQUIPMENT; FEMALE; HUMAN; INCISOR; MALE; MECHANICAL STRESS; ORTHODONTIC DEVICE; ORTHODONTICS; PREMOLAR TOOTH; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; STATISTICAL MODEL; STATISTICS; SURFACE PROPERTY; SURVIVAL;

ADHESIVES; BICUSPID; COMPOSITE RESINS; CUSPID; CYANOACRYLATES; DENTAL BONDING; EQUIPMENT FAILURE; FEMALE; HUMANS; INCISOR; LINEAR MODELS; MALE; ORTHODONTIC APPLIANCE DESIGN; ORTHODONTIC BRACKETS; RESIN CEMENTS; STAINLESS STEEL; STATISTICS; STRESS, MECHANICAL; SURFACE PROPERTIES; SURVIVAL ANALYSIS; WATER;

EID: 0036691378     PISSN: 16016335     EISSN: 16016343     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1034/j.1600-0544.2002.02207.x     Document Type: Article

References (50)

1. Buonocore MG. A simple method of increasing the adhesion of acrylic filling materials to enamel surfaces. J Dent Res 1955;34:849-53.
2. Newman GV. Epoxy adhesives for orthodontic attachments: progress report. Am J Orthod 1965;51:901-12.
3. Zachrisson BU. A posttreatment evaluation of direct bonding in orthodontics. Am J Orthod 1977;71:173-89.
4. Mizrahi E. Success and failure of banding and bonding. A clinical study. Angle Orthod 1982;52:113-7.
5. Newman GV. A post-treatment survey of direct bonding of metal brackets. Am J Orthod 1978;74:197-206.
6. Golden AM. A simplified bonding procedure for metal and plastic brackets. J Clin Orthod 1979;13:256-7.
7. Tavas MA, Watts DC. Bonding of orthodontic brackets by transillumination of a light-activated composite: an in vitro study. Br J Orthod 1979;6:207-10.
8. Cook PA, Youngson CC. An in vitro study of the bond strength of a glass-ionomer cement in the direct bonding of orthodontic brackets. Br J Orthod 1988;15:247-53.
9. Fricker JP. A 12-month clinical evaluation of a glass polyalkenoate cement for the direct bonding of orthodontic brackets. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 1992;101:381-4.
10. Millett DT, McCluskey LA, McAuley F, Creanor SL, Newell J, Love J. A comparative clinical trial of a compomer and a resin adhesive for orthodontic bonding. Angle Orthod 2000;70:233-40.
11. Smith RT, Shivapuja PK. The evaluation of dual cement resins in orthodontic bonding. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 1993;103:448-51.
12. Sargison AE, McCabe JF, Gordon PH. An ex vivo study of self-, light-, and dual-cured composites for orthodontic bonding. Br J Orthod 1995;22:319-23.
13. Ash S, Hay N. Adhesive pre-coated brackets: a comparative clinical study. Br J Orthod 1996;23:325-9.
14. Bishara SE, Khowassah MA, Oesteerle LJ. Effect of humidity and temperature changes on orthodontic bonding adhesive systems. J Dent Res 1975;54:751-8.
15. Hormati AA, Fuller JL, Denehy GE. Effects of contamination and mechanical disturbance on the quality of acid etched enamel. J Am Dent Assoc 1980;100:34-8.
16. Grandhi RK, Combe EC, Speidel TM. Shear bond strength of stainless steel orthodontic brackets with a moisture-insensitive primer. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 2001;119:251-5.
17. Cook WD. Polymerization defects in composite resins. In: Vanherle G, Smith DC, editors. Posterior Composite Resin Dental Restorative Materials. Amsterdam: Szulc Publishing, 1985: pp. 273-86.
18. Eliades T, Katsavrias E, Eliades G. Moisture-insensitive adhesives: reactivity with water and bond strength to wet and saliva-contaminated enamel. Eur J Orthod 2002;24:35-42.
19. Cacciafesta V, Jost-Brnkman PG, Süßenberg U, Miethke RR. Effects of saliva and water contamination on the enamel shear bond strength of a light-cured glass ionomer cement. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 1998;113:402-7.
20. Cacciafesta V, Bosch C, Melsen B. Clinical comparison between a resin-reinforced self-cured glass ionomer cement and a composite resin for direct bonding of orthodontic brackets Part 1: Wetting with water. Clin Orthod Res 1998;51:29-36.
21. Eliades T, Eliades G. Orthodontic adhesive resins. In: Brantley WA, Eliades T, editors. Orthodontic Materials, Scientific and Clinical Aspects. Stuttgart: Thieme, 2001: pp. 201-20.
22. Al-Munajed MK, Gordon PH, McCabe JF. The use of a cyanoacrylate adhesive for bonding orthodontic brackets: an ex-vivo study. J Orthod 2000;27:255-60.
23. Crabb JJ, Wilson HJ. Use of some adhesives in orthodontics. Dent Pract 1971;22:111-2.
24. Howells DJ, Jones P. In vitro evaluation of a cyanoacrylate bonding agent. Br J Orthod 1989;16:75-8.
25. Kahl B, Konig A, Hilgers RD, Schwarze CW. [Ethyl cyanoacrylate (Cyano-Veneer) as an orthodontic bracket adhesive. A comparative in-vitro study with Cyano-Veneer and a conventional orthodontic bracket adhesive]. Fortschr Kieferorthop 1993;54: 263-7.
26. Krishnan PH, Gupta DS, Sharma VP. Application of cyanoacrylate in orthodontics. J Polymer Materials 1994;11:299-300.
27. Korbmacher H, Klocke A, Huck L, Kahl-Nieke B. Evaluation of new one-phase orthodontic adhesive. Eur J Orthod 2000;22:595 (Abstract).
28. Örtendahl TW, Örtengren U. A new orthodontic bonding adhesive. J Clin Orthod 2000;34:50-4.
29. Eliades T, Brantley WA. The inappropriateness of conventional orthodontic bond strength assessment protocols. Eur J Orthod 2000;22:13-23.
30. Årtun J, Bergland S. Clinical trials with crystal growth conditioning as an alternative to acid-etch enamel pretreatment. Am J Orthod 1984;85:333-40.
31. Turner PJ. The clinical evaluation of a fluoride-containing orthodontic bonding material. Br J Orthod 1993;20:307-13.
32. Gustafsson M, Lindman R. Failure rates of four different orthodontic bonding systems. Eur J Orthod 2000;22: Abstract 47.
33. O'Brien KD, Read MJ, Sandison RJ, Roberts CT. A visible lightactivated direct-bonding material: an in vivo comparative study. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 1989;95:348-51.
34. Sunna S, Rock WP. Clinical performance of orthodontic brackets and adhesive systems: a randomized clinical trial. Br J Orthod 1998;25:283-7.
35. Shammaa I, Ngan PK, Im H, Kao E, Gladwin M, Gunel E, Brown C. Comparison of bracket debonding force between two conventional resin adhesives and a resin-reinforced glass ionomer cement: an in vitro and in vivo study. Angle Orthod 1999;69:463-9.
36. Cacciafesta V, Bosch C, Melsen B. Clinical comparison between a resin-reinforced self-cured glass ionomer cement and a composite resin for direct bonding of orthodontic brackets. Part 2: Bonding on dry enamel and on enamel soaked with saliva. Clin Orthod Res 1999;2:186-93.
37. Chung CH, Piatti A. Clinical comparison of the bond failure rates between fluoride-releasing and non-fluoride-releasing composite resins. J Clin Orthod 2000;34:409-12.
38. Lovius BBJ, Pender N, Hewage S, O'Dowling I, Tomkins A. A clinical trial of a light activated material over an 18-month period. Br J Orthod 1987;14:11-20.
39. Wiltshire WA. Shear bond strength of a glass ionomer for direct bonding in orthodontics. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 1994;106:127-30.
40. Trimpeneers LM, Dermaut LR. A clinical trial comparing the failure rates of two orthodontic bonding systems. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 1996;110:547-50.
41. Carstensen W. Clinical results after direct bonding of brackets using shorter etching times. Am J Orthod 1986;89:70-2.
42. Kinch AP, Taylor H, Warltier R, Oliver RG, Newcombe RG. A clinical trial comparing the failure rates of directly bonded brackets using etch times of 15 or 60 seconds. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 1988;94:476-83.
43. Sonis AL. Comparison of a light-cured adhesive with an autopolymerizing bonding system. J Clin Orthod 1988;22:730-2.
44. Read MJ, O'Brien KD. A clinical trial of an indirect bonding technique with a visible light-cured adhesive. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 1990;98:259-62.
45. Millett DT, Hallgren A, Cattanach D, McFadzean R, Pattison J, Robertson M, Love J. A 5-year clinical review of bond failure with a light-cured resin adhesive. Angle Orthod 1998;68:351-6.
46. Armas Galindo HR, Sadowsky PL, Vlachos C, Jacobson A, Wallace D. An in vivo comparison between a visible light-cured bonding system and a chemically cured bonding system. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 1998;113:271-5.
47. Underwood ML, Rawls HR, Zimmerman BF. Clinical evaluation of a fluoride-exchanging resin as an orthodontic adhesive. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 1989;96:93-9.
48. Gorelick L, Geiger AM, Gwinnett AJ. Implications of the failure rates of bonded brackets and eyelets: a clinical study. Am J Orthod 1984;86:403-6.
49. Whittaker DK. Structural variations in the surface zone of human tooth enamel observed by scanning electron microscopy. Arch Oral Biol 1982;27:383-92.
50. White L. Toothbrush pressures of orthodontic patients. Am J Orthod 1983;83:109-13.