The Rise of Female Leaders;Der Aufstieg von Frauen in hohe Führungspositionen

Zeitschrift fur Sozialpsychologie

Volumn 34, Issue 3, 2003, Pages 123-132

  Eagly, Alice H ^a  

^a NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Gender prejudice; Gender roles; Leadership; Leadership style; Sex discrimination; Women

Indexed keywords

EID: 0141976842     PISSN: 00443514     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1024//0044-3514.34.3.123     Document Type: Article

References (70)

1. Adler, N.J. (1999). Global leaders: Women of influence. In G.N. Powell (Ed.), Handbook of gender & work (pp. 239-261). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
2. American Council on Education. (2002). The American college president. Washington, DC: American Council on Education.
3. Astin, A.W., Parrott, S.A., Korn, W.S., & Sax, L. J. (1997). The American freshman: Thirty year trends. Los Angeles: Higher Education Research Institute, University of California, Los Angeles.
4. Basinger, J. (2002, November 22). The growing $500,000 club. Chronicle of Higher Education, 49(13), A29, 49.
5. Bass, B.M. (1998). Transformational leadership: Industry, military, and educational impact. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
6. Burgess, D., & Borgida, E. (1999). Who women are, who women should be: Descriptive and prescriptive gender stereotyping in sex discrimination. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 5, 665-692.
7. Burns, J.M. (1978). Leadership. New York: Harper & Row.
8. Byrnes, J.P., Miller, D.C., & Schafer, W.D. (1999). Gender differences in risk taking: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 125, 367-383.
9. Carli, L.L. (2001). Gender and social influence. Journal of Social Issues, 57, 725-741.
10. Catalyst. (2002). Fact sheet: Women CEOs. Retrieved October 6, 2002 from http://www.catalystwomen.org/press_room/factsheets/fact_women_ceos.htm
11. Center for American Woman and Politics. (2003). Fact sheet: Women in elective office 2003. Retrieved March 10, 2003 from http://www.rci.rutgers.edu/ ̃cawp/pdf/ elective.pdf
12. Center for Leadership Studies. (2000). Multifactor leadership questionnaire: Norms. Retrieved June 22,2000, from http://cls.binghamton.edu/mlq.htm
13. Cleveland, J.N., Stockdale, M., & Murphy, K.R. (2000). Women and men in organizations: Sex and gender issues at work. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
14. DeMott, B. (2000). Killer woman blues: Why Americans can't think straight about gender and power. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
15. Deutsch, C.H. (2002, June 2). At Xerox, the chief earns (grudging) respect. New York Times, Sec. 3, p. 1.
16. de Zárate, R.O. (2003). Women world leaders: 1945-2003. Retrieved February 21, 2003 from http://www.terra.es/pereona12/monolith/00women.htm
17. Diekman, A.B., & Eagly, A.H. (2000). Stereotypes as dynamic constructs: Women and men of the past, present, and future. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 26, 1171-1188.
18. Diekman, A.B., & Goodfriend, W. (2002). Attitudes toward social groups in motion: The evaluative content of dynamic and static gender stereotypes. Manuscript submitted for publication.
19. Eagly, A.H. (in press). Prejudice: Toward a more inclusive understanding. In A.H. Eagly, R.M. Baron, & V.L. Hamilton (Eds.), The social psychology of group identity and social conflict: Theory, application, and practice. Washington, DC: APA Books.
20. Eagly, A.H., & Carli, L.L. (in press). Women and men as leaders. In J. Antonakis, R.J. Sternberg, & A.T. Cianciolo, (Eds.), The nature of leadership. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
21. Eagly, A.H., & Johannesen-Schmidt, M.C. (2001). The leadership styles of women and men. Journal of Social Issues, 57, 781-797.
22. Eagly, A.H., Johannesen-Schmidt, M.C., & van Engen, M. (2003). Transformational, transactional, and laissez-faire leadership styles: A meta-analysis comparing women and men. Psychological Bulletin, 95, 569-591.
23. Eagly, A.H., & Johnson, B.T. (1990). Gender and leadership style: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 108, 233-256.
24. Eagly, A.H., & Karau, S.J. (1991). Gender and the emergence of leaders: A meta-analysis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 60, 685-710.
25. Eagly, A.H., & Karau, S.J. (2002). Role congruity theory of prejudice toward female leaders. Psychological Review, 109, 573-598.
26. Eagly, A.H., Makhijani, M.G., & Klonsky, B.C. (1992). Gender and the evaluation of leaders: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 111, 3-22.
27. Eagly, A.H., & Mladinic, A. (1994). Are people prejudiced against women? Some answers from research on attitudes, gender stereotypes, and judgments of competence. In W. Stroebe & M. Hewstone (Eds.), European review of social psychology (Vol. 5, pp. 1-35). New York: Wiley.
28. Eagly, A.H., Wood, W., & Diekman, A.B. (2000). Social role theory of sex differences and similarities: A current appraisal. In T. Eckes & H.M. Trautner (Eds.), The developmental social psychology of gender (pp. 123-174). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
29. Fiske, S.T., Bersoff, D.N., Borgida, E., Deaux, K., & Heilman, M.E. (1991). Social science research on trial: Use of sex stereotyping research in Price Waterhouse v. Hopkins. American Psychologist, 46, 1049-1060.
30. Fondas, N. (1997). Feminization unveiled: Management qualities in contemporary writings. Academy of Management Review, 22, 257-282.
31. Fortune (2003). The 2002 global 500: The CEOs. Retrieved February 21, 2003 from http://www.fortune.com/fortune/global500/ceo/0,15127,00.html
32. Garvin, D.A. (1993). Building a learning organization. Harvard Business Review, 77(4), 78-91.
33. Hall, J.A., & Friedman, G.B. (1999). Status, gender, and nonverbal behavior: A study of structured interactions between employees of a company. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 25, 1082-1091.
34. Hannover, B. & Kessels, U. (this issue). Erklärungsmuster weiblicher und männlicher Spitzen-Manager zur Un- terrepräsentanz von Frauen in Führungspositionen. Zeitschrift für Sozialpsychologie.
35. Hedges, L.V., & Nowell, A. (1995). Sex differences in mental test scores, variability, and numbers of high-scoring individuals. Science, 269, 41-45.
36. Heilmnan, M.E. (2001). Description and prescription: How gender stereotypes prevent women's ascent up the organizational ladder. Journal of Social Issues, 57, 657-674.
37. House, R.J., & Aditya, R.N. (1997). The social scientific study of leadership: Quo vadis? Journal of Management, 23, 409-473.
38. Juran, J.M. (1988). Juran on planning for quality. New York: Free Press.
39. Kanter, R.M. (1997). On the frontiers of management. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.
40. Konrad, AM., Ritchie, J.E. Jr., Lieb, P., & Corrigall, E. (2000). Sex differences and similarities in job attribute preferences: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 126, 593-641.
41. Langford, T., & MacKinnon, N.J. (2000). The affective bases for the gendering of traits: Comparing the United States and Canada. Social Psychology Quarterly, 63, 34-48.
42. Lipman-Blumen, J. (1996). The connective edge: Leading in an interdependent world. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
43. Lowe, K.B., Kroeck, K.G., & Sivasubramaniam, N. (1996). Effectiveness correlates of transformational and transactional leadership: Ameta-analytic review of the MLQ literature. Leadership Quarterly, 7, 385-425.
44. Lyness, K.S., & Thompson, D.E. (1997). Above the glass ceiling? A comparison of matched samples of female and male executives. Journal of Applied Psychology, 82, 359-375.
45. Maume, D.J. (1999). Glass ceilings and glass escalators: Occupational segregation and race and sex differences in managerial promotions. Work and Organizations, 26, 483-509.
46. Morrison, A.M., White, R.P., & Van Velsor, E. (1987). Breaking the glass ceiling: Can women reach the top of America's largest corporations? Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
47. Moskowitz, D.S., Suh, E.J., & Desaulniers, J. (1994). Situational influences on gender differences in agency and communion. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 66, 753-761.
48. Ohlott, P.J., Ruderman, M.N., & McCauley, C.D. (1994). Gender differences in managers' developmental job experiences. Academy of Management Journal, 37, 46-67.
49. Ragins, B.R., Townsend, B., & Mattis, M. (1998). Gender gap in the executive suite: CEOs and female executive report on breaking the glass ceiling. Academy of Management Executive, 12, 28-42.
50. Reskin, B.F. (2000). Getting it right: Sex and race inequal ity in work organizations. Annual Review of Sociology, 26, 707-709.
51. Reskin, B.F., & Roos, P.A. (1990). Job queues, gender queues: Explaining women's inroads into male occupations. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
52. Reskin, B.F., & Ross, C.E. (1995). Jobs, authority, and earnings among managers: The continuing significance of sex. In J.A. Jacobs (Ed.), Gender inequality at work (pp. 127-151). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
53. Rudman, L.A., & Glick, P. (1999). Feminized management and backlash toward agentic women: The hidden costs to women of a kinder, gentler image of middle management. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 77, 1004-1010.
54. Rudman, L.A., & Glick, P. (2001). Prescriptive gender stereotypes and backlash toward agentic women. Journal of Social Issues, 57, 743-762
55. Schein, V.E. (2001). A global look at psychological barriers to women's progress in management. Journal of Social Issues, 57, 675-688.
56. Sczesny, S. (this issue). Führungskompetenz: Selbst- und Fremdwahrnehmung weiblicher und männlicher Füh-rungskräfte. Zeitschrift für Sozialpsychologie.
57. Smith, R.A. (2002). Race, gender, and authority in the workplace: Theory and research. Annual Review of Sociology, 28, 509-542.
58. Steffens, M.C., & Mehl, B. (this issue). Erscheinen "Karrierefrauen" weniger sozial kompetent als "Karrieremänner"? -Geschlechterstereotype und Führungskräfteauswahl. Zeitschrift für Sozialpsychologie.
59. Twenge, J.M. (1997). Changes in masculine and feminine traits over time: A meta-analysis. Sex Roles, 36, 305-325.
60. Twenge, J.M. (2001). Changes in women's assertiveness in response to status and roles: A cross-temporal meta-analysis, 1931-1993. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81, 133-145.
61. United Nations. (2002). Women in public life. In The world's women 2000: Trends and statistics. Retrieved November 5, 2002 from http://unstats.un.org/unsd/demographic/ww2000/table6a.htm
62. U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics. (1982). Labor force statistics derived from the current population survey: A databook (Vol. 1: Bulletin 2096). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Labor.
63. U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics. (2002). Household data: Annual averages (Table 11: Employed persons by detailed occupation, sex, race, and Hispanic origin). Retrieved March 10, 2003 from http://www.bls.gov/ cps/cpsaat11.pdf
64. U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Educational Statistics. (2000). NAEP trends in academic progress: Three decades of student performance (NCES 2000-469, by J.R. Campbell, CM. Hombo, & J. Mazzeo). Washington, DC: Author. Retrieved May 15, 2001, from http://nces.ed.gov/NAEP/site/home. asp
65. U.S. Office of Personnel Management. (2002). The fact book, 2002 edition: Federal civilian workforce statistics. Washington, DC: Author. Retrieved March 10, 2003 from http://www.opm.gov/feddata/02factbk.pdf
66. Williams, C.L. (1992). The glass escalator: Hidden advantages for men in the "female" professions. Social Problems, 39, 253-267.
67. Williams, C.L. (1995). Still a man's world: Men who do women's work. Berkeley: University of California Press.
68. Wootton, B.H. (1997). Gender differences in occupational employment. Monthly Labor Review, 120(4), 14-24.
69. Wright, E.O., Baxter, J., & Birkelund, G.E. (1995). The gender gap in workplace authority: A cross-national study. American Sociological Review, 60, 407-435.
70. Yoder, J.D. (2001). Making leadership work more effectively for women. Journal of Social Issues, 57, 815-828.