Pulp response to direct capping with an adhesive system

American Journal of Dentistry

Volumn 13, Issue 2, 2000, Pages 81-87

  Costa, Carlos A S ^a   Mesas, Arthur N ^b   Hebling, Josimeri ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN SCHOOL OF DENTISTRY   (United States)

^b NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BISPHENOL A BIS(2 HYDROXYPROPYL) ETHER DIMETHACRYLATE; BISPHENOL A GLYCIDYL METHACRYLATE; DENTIN BONDING AGENT; DENTIN BONDING AGENTS; DIAGNOSTIC AGENT; DYE; FLUORESCENT DYE; POLYMETHACRYLIC ACID DERIVATIVE; PRIME & BOND; RESIN; ZINC OXIDE EUGENOL;

ANIMAL; ARTICLE; CLASSIFICATION; DENTAL SURGERY; DRUG EFFECT; ENDODONTICS; FOLLOW UP; MALE; MOLAR TOOTH; ODONTOBLAST; PATHOLOGY; PATHOPHYSIOLOGY; PHYSIOLOGY; PULPITIS; RAT; SURFACE PROPERTY; TOOTH DISEASE; TOOTH PULP; TOOTH PULP DISEASE; WOUND HEALING;

ANIMAL; BISPHENOL A-GLYCIDYL METHACRYLATE; COMPOSITE RESINS; DENTAL CAVITY PREPARATION; DENTAL LEAKAGE; DENTAL PULP; DENTAL PULP CAPPING; DENTAL PULP EXPOSURE; DENTAL RESTORATION, PERMANENT; DENTIN, SECONDARY; DENTIN-BONDING AGENTS; DYES; FLUORESCENT DYES; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; MALE; MOLAR; ODONTOBLASTS; POLYMETHACRYLIC ACIDS; PULPITIS; RATS; SUPPORT, NON-U.S. GOV'T; SURFACE PROPERTIES; WOUND HEALING; ZINC OXIDE-EUGENOL CEMENT;

EID: 0034173025     PISSN: 08948275     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Cox CF, Hafez AA, Akimoto N, et al. Biocompatibility of primer, adhesive and resin composite systems on non-exposed and exposed pulps of non-human primate teeth. Am J Dent 1998;10:S55-S63.
2. Akimoto N, Momoi Y, Kohno A, et al. Biocompatibility of Clearfil Liner Bond 2 and Clearfil AP-X system on nonexposed and exposed primate teeth. Quint Int 1998;29:177-188.
3. Tsuneda Y, Hayakawa T, Yamamoto H, et al. A histological study of direct pulp capping with adhesive resin. Oper Dent 1995;20:223-229.
4. Hanks CT, Strawn RR, Wataha JC, et al. Cytotoxic effects of resin components on cultured mammalian fibroblasts. J Dent Res 1991;70: 1450-1455.
5. Ratanasathien S, Wataha JC, Hanks CT, et al. Cytotoxic interactive effects of dentin bonding components on mouse fibroblasts. J Dent Res 1995;74:1602-1606.
6. Smith AJ, Cassidy N, Perry H, et al. Reactionary dentinogenesis. Int J Dev Biol 1995;39:273-288.
7. Cox CF. Biocompatibility of dental materials in the absence of bacterial infection. Oper Dent 1987;12:146-152.
8. Watts A, Paterson RC. Pulpal response to a zinc oxide-eugenol cement. Int Endod J 1987;20:82-86.
9. Onoe N. Study of adhesive bonding system as a direct pulp capping agent. Jap J Cons Dent 1994;37:429-436.
10. Costa CAS, Benatti Neto C, Hebling J, et al. Compatibilidade biológica do tecido conjuntivo de rato ao implante de óxido de zinco e eugenol (OZE) variando aproporção pó/líquido. Rev Odontol UNESP 1994;4:97-103.
11. Hume WR. An analysis of the release and the diffusion through dentin from zinc-oxide eugenol mixtures. J Dent Res 1984;63:881-884.
12. Bergenholtz G, Cox CF, Loesche WJ et al. Bacterial leakage around dental restorations: Its effect on the dental pulp. A microbial and histopathological study. J Oral Pathol 1982;11:439-450.
13. Bergenholtz G. Iatrogenic injury to the pulp in dental procedures: Aspects of pathogeneisis, management and preventive measures. Int Dent J 1991;41:99-110.
14. Ruch JV, Lesot H, Begue-kirn C. Odontoblast differentiation. Int J Dev Biol 1995;39:51-68.
15. Yoshiba K, Yoshiba N, Nakamura H, et al. Immunolocalization of fibronectin during reparative dentinogenesis in human teeth after pulp capping with calcium hydroxide. J Dent Res 1996;75:1590-1593.
16. Senzaki H. A histological study of reparative dentinogenesis in the rat incisor after colchicine administration. Archs Oral Biol 1980;25:737-740.
17. Tziafas D. Reparative dentinogenesis: A monograph on the dentinogenic potential of dental pulp. Thessaloniki: University Studio Press, 1997;41-55.
18. Kitasako Y, Inokoshi S, Fujitani M, et al. Short-term reaction of exposed monkey pulp beneath adhesive resins. Oper Dent 1998;23:308-317.
19. Cox CF, Keall CL, Keall HJ, et al. Biocompatibility of surface sealed dental materials against exposed pulp. J Prosthet Dent 1987;57:1-8.
20. Pereira JC, Segala AD, Costa CAS. Human pulp response to direct capping with an adhesive system. Am J Dent, In press.
21. Nascimento ABL, Fontana U, Costa CAS. Histologic evaluation of human pulp in direct contact with different materials. J Dent Res 1998;77:690 (Abstr 466).
22. Araújo FB, Barata JS, Costa CAS, et al. Clinical, radiographical and histological evaluation of direct capping with a resin adhesive in primary teeth. Am J Dent 2000, In press.
23. Costa CAS, Hebling J, Teixeira MF. Estudo preliminar da compatibilidade biológica dos adesivos dentinarios All-Bond 2 e Scotchbond MP. Avaliação histológica de implantes subcutâneos em ratos. Rev Odontol Univ São Paulo 1996;11:11-18.
24. Costa CAS, Teixeira HM; Nascimento ABL, et al. Biocompatibility of an adhesive system and 2-hydroxyethylmethacrylate. J Dent Child 1999, In press.
25. Gwinnett AJ, Tay FR. Early and intermediate time response of the dental pulp to an acid etch technique in vivo. Am J Dent 1998;10:S35-S44.
26. Hebling J, Giro EMA, Costa CAS. Biocompatibility of an adhesive system applied to exposed human dental pulp. J Endod 1999, In press.
27. Watts A, Paterson RC. A comparison of pulp responses to two different materials in the dog and the rat. Oral Surg 1981;52:648-652.