The effect of etching on bacterial microleakage of an adhesive composite restoration

Journal of Dentistry

Volumn 30, Issue 1, 2002, Pages 29-36

  Murray, Peter E ^a,b   Smyth, Thomas W ^c   About, Imad ^d   Remusat, Remeille ^d   Franquin, Jean Claude ^d   Smith, Anthony J ^b  

^a INDIANA UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF DENTISTRY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF BIRMINGHAM   (United Kingdom)

^c St Anthony Hospital   (United States)

^d AIX MARSEILLE UNIVERSITY   (France)

Author keywords

Adhesives; Inflammation; Microleakage; Phosphoric acid; Pulp

Indexed keywords

ADHESIVE AGENT; EDETIC ACID; PHOSPHORIC ACID; RESIN; BISPHENOL A BIS(2 HYDROXYPROPYL) ETHER DIMETHACRYLATE; DENTIN BONDING AGENT; RESIN CEMENT; SCOTCHBOND DUAL CURE;

ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ARTICLE; BACTERIUM; CONTROLLED STUDY; CORRELATION ANALYSIS; DENTAL ETCHING; DENTIN; EXPOSURE; FEMALE; FREQUENCY ANALYSIS; GEL; HUMAN; INFLAMMATION; MALE; MEDICAL ASSESSMENT; MORPHOMETRICS; MOUTH CAVITY; ORTHODONTICS; PRACTICE GUIDELINE; PROBLEM SOLVING; STANDARDIZATION; TOOTH EXTRACTION; TOOTH PULP; ADOLESCENT; ADULT; CHILD; CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CYTOLOGY; DENTAL ACID ETCHING; DENTAL SURGERY; DRUG EFFECT; METHODOLOGY; ODONTOBLAST; PULPITIS; SECRETION; TOOTH DISEASE; TOOTH PULP DISEASE;

ACID ETCHING, DENTAL; ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; BISPHENOL A-GLYCIDYL METHACRYLATE; CHILD; DENTAL LEAKAGE; DENTAL PULP NECROSIS; DENTAL RESTORATION, PERMANENT; DENTIN; DENTIN, SECONDARY; DENTIN-BONDING AGENTS; EDETIC ACID; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; ODONTOBLASTS; PHOSPHORIC ACIDS; PULPITIS; RESIN CEMENTS; SMEAR LAYER;

EID: 0036134373     PISSN: 03005712     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0300-5712(01)00055-0     Document Type: Article

References (45)

1. Brännström M, Nordenvall K-J, Glanz P-O. The effect of EDTA-containing surface-active solutions on the morphology of prepared dentin: an in vivo study. J Dent Res 1980;59:1127-31.
2. Czonstkowsy M, Wilson EG, Holstein FA. The smear layer in endodontics. Dent Clin N Am 1990;34:13-25.
3. Takeda FH, Harashima T, Kimura Y, et al. A comparative study of the removal of smear layer by three endodontic irrigants and two types of laser. Int Endodont J 1999;32:32-9.
4. Pashley DH. Smear layer: an overview of structure and function. Proc Finnish Dent Soc 1992;88(Suppl 1):S215-24.
5. Sen BH, Wesselink PR, Turkun M. The smear layer: a phenomenon in root canal therapy. Int Endodont J 1995;28:141-8.
6. Llindemann RA, Hume WR, Wolcott RB. Dentin permeability and pulpal response to EDTA. J Prosthetic Dent 1985;53:341-3.
7. White GJ, Beech DR, Tyas MJ. Dentin smear layer: an asset or a liability for bonding? Dent Mater 1989;5:379-83.
8. Santinin A, Mitchell S. A scanning electron microscopic study of the effect of Gluma CPS bonding system on dentinal smear layers produced by different bur types and rotational speeds and on the reson-dentin interface. Quintess Int 1998;29:737-47.
9. Akimotot N, Momoi Y, Kohno A, et al. Biocompatibility of Clearfil liner bond 2 and Clearfil AP-X system on nonexposed and exposed primate teeth. Dent Mater 1998;29:177-88.
10. Maupome G, Sheiham A. Criteria for restoration replacement and restoration life-span estimates in an educational environment. J Oral Rehab 1998;25:896-901.
11. Burke FJ, Cheung SW, Mjör IA, et al. Reasons for the placement and replacement of restorations in vocational training practices. Primary Dent Care 1999;6:17-20.
12. Bergenholtz G, Cox CF, Loesche WJ, et al. Bacterial leakage around dental restorations; its effect on the dental pulp. J Oral Pathol 1982;11:439-50.
13. Cox CF. Microleakage related to restorative procedures. Proc Finnish Dent Soc 1992;88(Suppl 1):83-93.
14. Poldon AM, Federick GT, Ladenheim S, et al. The production of a root surface smear layer by instrumentation and its removal by citric acid. J Periodontol 1994;55:443-6.
15. Blomof J, Lindskog S. Root surface texture and early cell and tissue colonisation after different etching modalities. Eur J Oral Sci 1995;103:17-24.
16. Vougioklakis G, Smith DC, Lipton S. Evaluation of the bonding of cervical restorative materials. J Oral Rehab 1982;9:231-5.
17. Pashley DH. Smear layer: physiological considerations. Operative Dent 1984;3(Suppl):13-29.
18. Gwinnett AJ. Smear layer: morphological considerations. Operative Dent 1984;3(Suppl):S3-S12.
19. Murray PE, About I, Lumley PJ, et al. Postoperative pulpal and repair responses. J Am Dent Ass 2000;131:321-9.
20. Murray PE, About I, Lumley PJ, et al. Human odontoblast cell numbers after dental injury. J Dent 2000;28:277-85.
21. Murray PE, Lumley PJ, Ross HF, et al. Tooth slice organ culture for cytotoxicity assessment of dental materials. Biomaterials 2000;21:1711-21.
22. Murray PE, About I, Franquin J-C, et al. Restorative pulpal and repair responses. J Am Dent Ass 2001;132:482-91.
23. Mjör IA. Biological and clinical properties. In: Mjor IA, editor. Dental materials, biological properties and clinical evaluation, Boca Raton: CRC Press, 1985. p. 91-121.
24. Mjör IA. Current views on biological testing of restorative materials. J Oral Rehab 1990;17:503-7.
25. Lille RD, Fulmer HM. Histopathologic technique and practical histochemistry. 4th ed. New York, USA: McGraw-Hill, 1976.
26. Dawson-Saunders B, Trapp RG. Basic and clinical biostatistics. 2nd ed. Norwalk, CN, USA: Appleton and Lange, 1994.
27. Mjör IA. Dentin and pulp. Reaction patterns in human teeth. Florida: CRC Press, 1983. p. 63-156.
28. Smith AJ, Cassidy N, Perry H, et al. Reactionary dentinogenesis. Int J Dev Biol 1995;39:273-80.
29. Zöllner A, Gaengler P. Pulp reactions to different preparation techniques on teeth exhibiting periodontal disease. J Oral Rehab 2000;27:93-102.
30. Eick JD, Gwinnett JD, Pashley DH, et al. Current concepts on adhesion to dentin. Crit Rev Oral Biol Med 1997;8:306-35.
31. Tao L, Pashley DH, Boyd L. Effect of different types of smear layers on dentin and enamel shear bond strengths. Dent Mater 1988;4:208-16.
32. Tao L, Tagami J, Pashley DH. Effects of pulpal pressure on bond strengths of superbond and gluma. Am J Dent 1991;4:73-6.
33. Eick JD. Smear layer-materials surface. Proc Finnish Dent Soc 1992;88:225-42.
34. Leinfelder KF. Criteria for clinical evaluation of composite resin restorations. In: Anusavice K, editor. Quantity evaluation of dental restorations, Chicago: Quintess Publishing Co, 1989. p. 95-110.
35. Pashley DH. Clinical considerations of microleakage. J Endodont 1990;16:70-7.
36. Cox CF. Evaluation and treatment of bacterial microleakage. Am J Dent 1994;7:293-5.
37. Pameijer CH, Stanley HR. Pulp reaction to a dentin bonding agent. Am J Dent 1995;8:140-4.
38. Torneck CD. Reaction of hamster tissue to drugs used in sterilization of the root canal. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1961;14:730-47.
39. Finkelman RD, Mohan RD, Jennings JC, et al. Quantitation of growth factors IGF-I, SG/IGF-II and TGF-β in human dentine. J Bone Miner Res 1990;5:717-23.
40. Cassidy N, Fahey M, Prime SS, et al. Comparative analysis of transforming growth factor-beta isoforms 1-3 in human and rabbit dentine matrices. Archs Oral Biol 1997;42:219-23.
41. Sloan AJ, Smith AJ. Stimulation of the dentine-pulp complex of rat incisor teeth by transforming growth factor - β isoforms 1-3 in vitro. Archs Oral Biol 1999;44:149-56.
42. Takata T, D'Errico JA, Atkins KB, et al. Protein extracts of dentin affect proliferation and differentiation of osteoprogenitor cells in vitro. J Periodontol 1998;69:1247-55.
43. Pashley EL, Tao L, Derkson G, et al. Dentin permeability and bond strength after various surface treatments. Dent Mater 1989;5:375-8.
44. Kugel G, Ferrari M. The science of bonding: from first to sixth generation. J Am Dent Assoc 2000;13:139-47.
45. Camps J, Dejou J, Remusat M, et al. Factors influencing pulpal response to cavity restorations. Dent Mater 2000;16:432-40.