The safety assessment of novel foods and concepts to determine their safety in use

International Journal of Food Sciences and Nutrition

Volumn 54, Issue SUPPL., 2003, Pages

  Howlett, J ^a   Edwards, D G ^b   Cockburn, A ^c   Hepburn, P ^d   Kleiner, J ^e   Knorr, D ^f   Kozianowski, G ^g   Muller D ^h   Peijnenburg, A ⁱ   Perrin, I ^j   Poulsen, M ^k   Walker, R ^l  

^a The Lord Rank Centre ^*  (United Kingdom)

^b RHM Technology Ltd   (United Kingdom)

^c Monsanto UK Ltd   (United Kingdom)

^d UNILEVER RESEARCH   (United Kingdom)

^e International Life Sciences Institute of Europe   (Belgium)

^f TECHNISCHE UNIVERSITÄT BERLIN   (Germany)

^g Sudzucker AG Mannheim/Ochsenfurt   (Germany)

^h Procter/Gamble Service GmbH   (Germany)

ⁱ WAGENINGEN UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

^j NESTLÉ RESEARCH CENTER   (Switzerland)

^k DANISH VETERINARY AND FOOD ADMINISTRATION   (Denmark)

^l UNIVERSITY OF SURREY   (United Kingdom)

more..

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; COMPARATIVE STUDY; DECISION MAKING; DIETARY INTAKE; FOOD ANALYSIS; FOOD COMPOSITION; FOOD HANDLING; FOOD INDUSTRY; FOOD PROCESSING; FOOD SAFETY; GENOMICS; GOOD LABORATORY PRACTICE; HISTORY; HUMAN; INFORMATION PROCESSING; NUTRITIONAL SCIENCE; NUTRITIONAL VALUE; PROTEOMICS; QUALITY CONTROL; REFERENCE VALUE; TOXICITY TESTING;

ANIMALIA;

EID: 0141857869     PISSN: 09637486     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/09637480310001610308     Document Type: Article

References (44)

1. Anon (2001): High intensity electric field pulses. Trends Food Sci. Technol. 12, 89-112.
2. Australia New Zealand Food Authority (1998): Guidelines for the safety assessment of foods to be included in Standard A 18-Food produced using gene technology. Barton, Australia: Food Standards Australia New Zealand.
3. Barbosa-Canovas GV, Pothakamury UR, Pafou EK & Swanson BG (1998): Nonthermal preservation of foods. New York: Marcel Dekker inc.
4. Barlow SM, Greig JB, Bridges JW, Carere A, Carpy AJ, Galli CL, Kleiner J, Knudsen I, Koeter HB, Levy LS, Madsen C, Mayer S, Narbonne JF, Pfannkuch F, Prodanchuk MG, Smith MR & Steinberg P (2002): Hazard identification by methods of animal-based toxicology. Food Chem. Toxicol. 40, 145-191.
5. Busta F (2000): Quantification of destruction kinetics for microbial inactivation by alternative food processing technologies. Food Sci. 65(suppl.), 1S-108S.
6. Commission of the European Communities (1997): Recommendation of 29 July 1997 concerning the scientific aspects and the presentation of information necessary to support applications for the placing on the market of novel foods and novel food ingredients. L253, 1-36. Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities.
7. Commission of the European Communities (2001): Decision of 23.05.2001 on authorising the placing on the market of pasteurised fruit-based preparations produced using high-pressure pasteurisation as a novel food ingredient under Regulation (EC) No 258/97 of the European Parliament and of the Council. Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities.
8. Dybing E, Doe J, Groten J, Kleiner J, O'Brien J, Renwick AG, Schlatter J, Steinberg P, Tritscher A, Walker R & Younes M (2002): Hazard characterisation of chemicals in food and diet. Dose response, mechanisms and extrapolation issues. Food Chem. Toxicol. 40, 237-282.
9. ECETOC (2001): Genomics, Transcripts profiling, Proteomics and Metabolomics (GTPM) an introduction. Document 42. European Centre for Ecotoxicology and Toxicology of Chemicals.
10. Edler L, Poirier K, Dourson M, Kleiner J, Mileson B, Nordmann H, Renwick A, Slob W, Walton K & Wurtzen G (2002): Mathematical modelling and quantitative methods. Food Chem. Toxicol. 40, 283-326.
11. Edwards DG, Porter PD & Dean Jill (1985a): The responses of rats to various combinations of energy and protein I: Diets made from purified ingredients. Lab. Anim. 19, 328-335.
12. Edwards DG & Dean Jill (1985b): The responses of rats to various combinations of energy and protein II: Diets made from natural ingredients. Lab. Anim. 19, 336-343.
13. Eisenbrand G, Pool-Zobel B, Baker V, Balls M, Blaauboer BJ, Boobis A, Carere A, Kevekordes S, Lhuguenot JC, Pieters R & Kleiner J (2002): Methods of in vitro toxicology. Food Chem. Toxicol. 40, 193-236.
14. FAO/WHO (1991): Strategies for assessing the safety of foods produced by biotechnology. Geneva: World Health Organization.
15. FAO/WHO (1996): Biotechnology and food safety. 61. Rome: FAO.
16. FAO/WHO (1997): Risk management and food safety. 65. Rome: FAO.
17. FAO/WHO CODEX (2002): Report of the Third Session of the CODEX Ad Hoc Intergovernmental Task Force on Foods Derived from Biotechnology, Proposed draft annex on the Assessment of Possible Allergenicity. 62-74. Rome: Codex Alimentarius FAO.
18. FAO/WHO UNICEF Protein Advisory Group (1970): PAG Statement No4 on Single Cell Protein. Tokyo: United Nations University Press.
19. GMOCARE QLK1-1999-00765. New methodologies for assessing the potential of unintended effects in genetically modified food crops. www.entransfood.com/RTDprojects/GMOCARE/default.htm. Wageningen, The Netherlands: RIKILT Institute of Food Safety.
20. Gould GW (1995): New methods of food preservation. London: Blackie Academic & Professional.
21. Health Canada (1994): Guidelines for the safety assessment of novel foods. Ottawa: Food Directorate Health Canada.
22. Hendricks M & Knorr D (2002): Ultra high pressure processing of foods. New York: Kluwer.
23. ILSI Europe (1999): Safety assessment of viable genetically modified micro-organisms used in food. International Washington, DC: Life Sciences Institute Press.
24. Jonas DA, Antignac E, Antoine JM, Classen HG, Huggett A, Knudsen I, Mahler J, Ockhuizen T, Smith M, Teuber M, Walker R & De Vogel P (1996): The safety assessment of novel foods. Guidelines prepared by ILSI Europe Novel Food Task Force. Food Chem. Toxicol. 34, 931-940.
25. Jonas DA, Elmadfa I, Engel KH, Heller KJ, Kozianowski G, Konig A, Muller D, Narbonne JF, Wackernagel W & Kleiner J (2001): Safety considerations of DNA in food. Ann. Nutr. Metab. 45, 235-254.
26. Keenan KP, Laroque P, Ballam GC, Soper KA, Dixit R, Mattson BA, Adams SP & Coleman JB (1996): The effects of diet, ad libitum overfeeding, and moderate dietary restriction on the rodent bioassay: the uncontrolled variable in safety assessment. Toxicol. Pathol. 24, 757-768.
27. Knudsen I & Ovesen L (1995): Assessment of novel foods: a call for a new and broader GRAS concept. Regul. Toxicol. Pharmacol. 21, 365-369.
28. Kroes R, Muller D, Lambe J, Lowik MR, van Klaveren J, Kleiner J, Massey R, Mayer S, Urieta I, Verger P & Visconti A (2002): Assessment of intake from the diet. Food Chem. Toxicol. 40, 327-385.
29. Mertens B & Knorr D (1997): Developments of nonthermal processes for food preservation. Food Technol. 46, 124-133.
30. Munro IC, McGirr LG, Nestmann ER & Kille JW (1996): Alternative approaches to the safety assessment of macronutrient substitutes. Regul. Toxicol. Pharmacol. 23, S6-14.
31. National Research Council (1995): Nutrient requirements of laboratory animals. Washington: National Academy Press.
32. OECD (1993): Safety evaluation of foods derived by modern biotechnology: concepts and principles. Paris: Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development.
33. OECD (2001a): Consensus document on compositional considerations for new varieties of soybean: key food and feed nutrients and anti-nutrients. 2. Paris: Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development.
34. OECD (2001b): Consensus document on key nutrients and key toxicants in low erucic acid rapeseed (canola). 1. Paris: Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development.
35. OECD (2002a): Consensus document on compositional considerations for new varieties of potatoes: key food and feed nutrients, anti-nutrients and toxicants. 4. Paris: Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development.
36. OECD (2002b): Consensus document on compositional considerations for new varieties of sugar beet: key food and feed nutrients and anti-nutrients. 3. Paris: Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development.
37. OECD (2002c): Consensus document on compositional considerations for new varieties of maize (Zea mays): key food and feed nutrients, anti-nutrients and secondary plant metabolites. 6. Paris: Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development.
38. Ozen BF & Floros JD (2001): Effects of emerging food processing techniques on the packaging materials. Trends Food Sci. Technol. 12, 60-67.
39. Renwick AG (1993): Data-derived safety factors for the evaluation of food additives and environmental contaminants. Food Addit. Contam. 10, 275-305.
40. Renwick AG (1995): The use of an additional safety or uncertainty factor for nature of toxicity in the estimation of acceptable daily intake and tolerable daily intake values. Regul Toxicol. Pharmacol. 22, 250-261.
41. US Food and Drug Administration (29-5-1992): Foods derived from new plant varieties. Federal Register 57 (104) 22984. Washington: Office of the Federal Register.
42. van den Brandt P, Voorrips L, Hertz-Picciotto I, Shuker D, Boeing H, Speijers G, Guittard C, Kleiner J, Knowles M, Wolk A & Goldbohm A (2002): The contribution of epidemiology. Food Chem. Toxicol. 40, 387-424.
43. WHO (1987): Principles for the safety assessment of food additives and contaminants in food. 70. Geneva: WHO.
44. World Medical Association (2002): Helsinki Declaration concerning ethical principles for medical research involving human subjects; first adopted Helsinki, June 1964 and last amended Washington 2002. www.wma.net/e/policy/b3.htm. France: The World Medical Association.