A Literature Review of Science and Mathematics Integration

School Science and Mathematics

Volumn 99, Issue 8, 1999, Pages 421-430

  Czerniak, Charlene M ^a   Weber, William B ^a   Sandmann, Alexa ^a   Ahern, John ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TOLEDO   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0141692620     PISSN: 00366803     EISSN: 19498594     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1949-8594.1999.tb17504.x     Document Type: Article

References (59)

1. AIMS Educational Foundation. (1986). Activities integrating math and science. Fresno, CA: Author.
2. AIMS Educational Foundation. (1987). Math + science: A solution. Fresno, CA: Author.
3. Beane, J. A. (1993). A middle school curriculum: From rhetoric to reality. Columbus, OH: National Middle School Association.
4. Beane, J. (1995). Curriculum integration and the disciplines of knowledge. Phi Delta Kappan, 76, 616–622.
5. Beane, J. (1996). On the shoulders of giants! The case for curriculum integration. Middle School Journal, 25, 6–11.
6. Berlin, D. (1994). The integration of science and mathematics education: Highlights from the NSF/SSMA Wingspread conference plenary papers. School Science and Mathematics, 94(1), 32–35.
7. Berlin, D., & White, A. (1992). Report from the NSF/SSMA Wingspread conference: A network for integrated science and mathematics teaching and learning. School Science and Mathematics, 92(6), 340–342.
8. Berlin, D., & White, A. (1994) The Berlin-White integrated science and mathematics model. School Science and Mathematics, 94(1), 2–4.
9. Bragow, D., Gragow, K. A., & Smith, E. (1995). Back to the future: Toward curriculum integration. Middle School Journal, 27, 39–46.
10. Brooks, J. G., & Brooks, M. G. (1993). In search of understanding: The case for constructivist classrooms. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
11. Brown, W. R., & Wall, C. E. (1976). A look at the integration of science and mathematics in the elementary school–1976. School Science and Mathematics, 76(1), 551–562.
12. Canady, R. (1995). Block scheduling: A catalyst for change in high schools. Princeton, NJ: Eye on Education.
13. Carnegie Council on Adolescent Development, Task Force on Education of Young Adolescents (1989). Turning points: Preparing American youth for the 21st century: The report of the task force on education of young adolescents. Washington, DC: Carnegie Council on Adolescent Development.
14. Cohen, P. (1995). Understanding the brain: Educators seek to apply brain research. ASCD Education Update, 37(7), 1, 4–5.
15. Cremin, L. (1964). The transformation of the school. New York: Vintage Press.
16. Davison, D. M., Miller, K. W., & Metheny, D. L. (1995). What does integration of science and mathematics really mean School Science and Mathematics, 95(5), 226–230.
17. Dickinson, V. L., & Young, T. A. (1998). Elementary science and language arts: Should we blur the boundaries School Science and Mathematics, 98(6), 334–339.
18. Gardner, H., & Boix-Mansilla, V. (1994). Teaching for understanding within and across the disciplines. Educational Leadership, 51, 14–18.
19. George, P. S. (1996). The integrated curriculum: A reality check. Middle School Journal, 28, 12–19.
20. Greene, L. C. (1991). Science-centered curriculum in elementary school. Educational Leadership, 49, 42–51.
21. Hart, D. (1994). Authentic assessment: A handbook for educators. Menlo Park, CA: Addison-Wesley.
22. Huntley, M. A. (1998). Design and implementation of a framework for defining integrated mathematics and science education. School Science and Mathematics, 98(6), 320–327.
23. Hurd, P. D. (1991). Why we must transform science education. Educational Leadership, 49(2), 33–35.
24. Institute for Mathematics and Science Education. (1995). Teaching integrated mathematics and science. University of Illinois at Chicago, IL: Author.
25. Jacobs, H. H. (1989). Interdisciplinary curriculum: Design and implementation. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
26. Lawrence Hall of Science. (1984). Great explorations in math and science. University of California at Berkeley, CA: Author.
27. Lederman, N. G., & Niess, M. L. (1997). Integrated, interdisciplinary, or thematic instruction? Is this a question or is it questionable semantics School Science and Mathematics, 97(2), 57–58.
28. Lehman, J. (1994). Integrating science and mathematics: Perceptions of preservice and practicing elementary teachers. School Science and Mathematics, 94(2), 58–64.
29. Lonning, R. A., & DeFranco, T. C. (1997). Integration of science and mathematics: A theoretical model. School Science and Mathematics, 97(4), 212–215.
30. Lonning, R. A., DeFranco, T. C., & Weinland, T. P. (1998). Development of theme-based, interdisciplinary, integrated curriculum: A theoretical model. School Science and Mathematics, 98(6), 312–319.
31. Mason, T. C. (1996). Integrated curricula: Potential and problems. Journal of Teacher Education, 47(4), 263–270.
32. McComas, W. F. (1993). STS education and the affective domain. In R. E. Yager (Ed.), What research says to the science teacher, 7: The science, technology, and society movement (pp. 161–168). Washington, DC: National Science Teachers Association.
33. McComas, W. F., & Wang, H. A. (1998). Blended science: The rewards and challenges of integrating the science disciplines for instruction. School Science and Mathematics, 98(6), 340–348.
34. Minnesota Mathematics and Science Project. (1970). Minneapolis, MN: Minnesota School Mathematics and Science Center.
35. National Association for the Education of Young Children. (1987). Developmentally appropriate practice in early childhood programs serving children from birth through age 8. Washington, DC: Author.
36. National Council for the Social Studies. (1994). Curriculum standards for social studies. Washington, DC: Author.
37. National Council of Teachers of English. (1996). Standards for the English language arts. Urbana, IL: Author; Newark, DE: International Reading Association.
38. National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (1989). Curriculum and evaluation standards for school mathematics. Reston, VA: Author.
39. National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (1991). Professional standards for teaching mathematics. Reston, VA: Author.
40. National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (1995). Assessment standards for school mathematics. Reston, VA: Author.
41. National Middle School Association. (1982). This we believe. Columbus, OH: Author.
42. National Research Council. (1989). Everybody counts: A report to the nation on the future of mathematics education. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
43. National Research Council. (1996). National science education standards. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
44. National Science Teachers Association. (1992). The content core. Washington DC: Author.
45. National Science Teachers Association. (1996). NSTA board endorses new position statement on interdisciplinary learning, PreK-grade 4. NSTA Reports!, 6, 8.
46. Perkins, D. (1991). Educating for insight. Educational Leadership, 49, 4–8.
47. Peters, T., Schubeck, K., & Hopkins, K. (1995). A thematic approach: Theory and practice at the Aleknagik school. Phi Delta Kappan, 76, 633–636.
48. Roebuck, K. I., & Warden, M. A. (1998). Searching for the center on the mathematics-science continuum. School Science and Mathematics, 98(6), 328–333.
49. Roth, K. J. (1994). Second thoughts about interdisciplinary studies. American Educator, 18(1) 44–48.
50. Rutherford, J., & Ahlgren. (1990). Science for all Americans. New York: Oxford University Press.
51. St. Clair, B., & Hough, D. L. (1992). Interdisciplinary teaching: A review of the literature. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. 373 056).
52. Stevenson, C., & Carr, J. (1993). Integrated studies: Dancing through walls. New York: Teachers College Press.
53. Underhill, R. (1995). Editorial. School Science and Mathematics, 95(5), 225.
54. Unified science and mathematics for elementary schools project. (1973). Newton, MA: Educational Development Center.
55. Vars, G. F. (1991). Integrated curriculum in historical perspective. Educational Leadership, 49, 14–15.
56. Venville, G., Wallace, J., Rennie, L. J., & Malone, J. (1998). The integration of science, mathematics, and technology in a discipline-based culture. School Science and Mathematics, 98(6), 294–302.
57. Watanabe, T., & Huntley, M. A. (1998). Connecting mathematics and science in undergraduate teacher education programs: Faculty voices from the Maryland collaborative for teacher preparation. School Science and Mathematics, 98(1), 19–25.
58. Wiggins, G. (1993). Assessment, authenticity, context, and validity. Educational Leadership, 46(7), 41–47.
59. Willis, S. (1992, November). Interdisciplinary learning: Movement to link the disciplines gains momentum. ASCD Curriculum Update, 1–8.