The Integration of Science, Mathematics, and Technology in a Discipline-Based Culture

School Science and Mathematics

Volumn 98, Issue 6, 1998, Pages 294-302

  Venville, Grady ^a   Wallace, John ^a   Rennie, Léonie J ^a   Malone, John ^a  

^a CURTIN UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 3042796691     PISSN: 00366803     EISSN: 19498594     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1949-8594.1998.tb17424.x     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. Barnes, H. (1991). Learning that grows with the learner: An introduction to Waldorf education. Educational Leadership, 49(2), 52–54.
2. Bean, J.A. (1991). The middle school: The natural home of integrated curriculum. Educational Leadership, 49(2), 9–13.
3. Brophy, J., & Alleman, J. (1991). A caveat: Curriculum integration is not always a good idea. Educational Leadership, 49(2), 66.
4. Case, R. (1994). Our crude handling of educational reforms: The case of curricular integration. Canadian Journal of Education, 19(1), 80–93.
5. Cormack (1996). From alienation to engagement: Opportunities for reform in the middle years of schooling, (Vol. 2). Canberra, Australian Capital Territory : Australian Curriculum Studies Association.
6. Cumming, J. (1993). Middle schooling for the twenty-first century (Seminar Series No. 28). Melbourne, Victoria : Incorporated Association of Registered Teachers of Victoria.
7. Cumming, J. (1996). From alienation to engagement: Opportunities for reform in the middle years of schooling, (Vol. 1, 3). Canberra, Australian Capital Territory : Australian Curriculum Studies Association.
8. Curriculum Council of Western Australia (1998). Curriculum framework consultation draft. Perth, Western Australia : Author.
9. Drake, S.M. (1991). How our team dissolved the boundaries. Educational Leadership, 49(2), 20–22.
10. Eyers, V. (1992). The middle years of schooling: The education of young adolescents, years six to nine (Seminar Series). Melbourne, Victoria : Incorporated Association of Registered Teachers of Victoria.
11. Fleming, D. (1993). A picture of the middle school: Philosophy, theory and practice. (Occasional Paper No. 29). Melbourne, Victoria : Incorporated Association of Registered Teachers of Victoria.
12. Fogarty, R. (1991). Ten ways to integrate the curriculum. Educational Leadership, 49(2), 61–65.
13. Guba, E., & Lincoln, Y. (1989). Fourth generation evaluation. Newbury Park, CA : Sage.
14. Hargreaves, A., Earl, L., & Ryan, J. (1996). Schooling for change: Reinventing education for early adolescents. London : Falmer Press.
15. Lonning, R. A., & DeFranco, T.C. (1994). Development and implementation of an integrated mathematics/science preservice elementary methods course. School Science and Mathematics, 94(1), 18–25.
16. Marsh, C.J. (1993, November). How achievable is curriculum integration? Practices and issues. A paper presented at the 10th Hong Kong Educational Research Association Conference, Hong Kong.
17. McDonald, J., & Czerniak, C. (1994). Developing interdisciplinary units: Strategies and examples. School Science and Mathematics, 94(1), 5–10.
18. National Council for Teachers of Mathematics (1989). Curriculum and evaluation standards for school mathematics. Reston, VA : Author.
19. National Research Council (1989). Everybody counts. A report to the nation on the future of mathematics education. Washington, DC : National Academy Press.
20. National Research Council (1996). National science education standards. Washington, DC : National Academy Press.
21. Nixon, J. (1991). Reclaiming coherence: Cross-curriculum provision and the national curriculum. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 23(2), 187–192.
22. Panaritis, P. (1995). Beyond brainstorming: Planning a successful interdisciplinary program. Phi Delta Kappan, 4, 623–628.
23. Richie, S.M., & Hampson, B. (1996). Learning in the making: A case study of science and technology projects in a year six classroom. Research in Science Education, 26(4), 391–407.
24. Roth, W.M. (1993). Problem-centered learning for the integration of mathematics and science in a constructivist laboratory: A case study. School Science and Mathematics, 93(3), 113–122.
25. Rutherford, F.J., & Ahlgren, A. (1990). Science for all Americans. New York : Oxford University Press.
26. Schools Council, National Board of Employment, Education and Training (1993). The compulsory years in the middle: Schooling for young adolescents. Canberra : Australian Government Publishing Service.
27. Speering, W., & Rennie, L. (1996). Students' perceptions about science: The impact of transition from primary to secondary school. Research in Science Education, 26(3), 283–298.
28. Tchudi, S., & Lafer, S. (1993). How dry is the desert? Nurturing interdisciplinary learning. Educational Leadership, 51(1), 76–79.
29. Vars, G.F. (1991). Integrated curriculum in historical perspective. Educational Leadership, 49(2), 14–15.
30. Wicklein, R.C., & Schell, J.W. (1997). Case studies of multidisciplinary approaches to integrating mathematics, science and technology education. Journal of Technology Education, 6(2), 1–9.
31. Williams, J., & Reynolds, T.D. (1993). Courting controversy: How to build interdisciplinary units. Educational Leadership, 50(7), 13–15.