Constructing shareable learning materials in bioengineering education

IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Magazine

Volumn 22, Issue 4, 2003, Pages 39-46

  Brophy, Sean P ^a  

^a VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BIOENGINEERING; CURRICULUM; EDUCATION; EDUCATION PROGRAM; EDUCATIONAL TECHNOLOGY; LEARNING; MATERIALS TESTING; REVIEW; TEACHING;

BIOMEDICAL ENGINEERING; COOPERATIVE BEHAVIOR; CURRICULUM; EDUCATION, PROFESSIONAL; INFORMATION STORAGE AND RETRIEVAL; INTERINSTITUTIONAL RELATIONS; LEARNING; MODELS, EDUCATIONAL; TEACHING; TEACHING MATERIALS; UNITED STATES;

EID: 0141636531     PISSN: 07395175     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1109/MEMB.2003.1237490     Document Type: Review

References (36)

1. T.R. Harris, J.D. Bransford, and S.P. Brophy, "Roles for learning sciences and learning technologies in biomedical engineering," Annu. Rev. Biomed. Eng., vol. 4, pp. 29-48, 2002.
2. Escot, Educational Software Components of Tomorrow. Available: http://www.escot.org
3. LESTER, Learning Science and Technology Repository. Available: http://lester.rice.edu
4. Merlot, Multimedia Educational Resource for Learning and Online Teaching. Available: http://www.merlot.org
5. SMETE, Science, Mathemtatics, Engineering and Technology Education. Available: http://www.smete.org
6. VaNTH ERC, Vanderbilt University, Northwestern University, University of Texas at Austin, and Health, Science and Technology at Harvard/MIT Engineering Research Center. Available: http://www.vanth.org
7. J.D. Bransford, N. Vye, H. Bateman, S.P. Brophy, and R.J. Roselli, "Vanderbilt's AMIGO Project: Knowledge of How People Learn Enters Cyberspace," in Learner Centered Theory and Practice in Distance Education: Case Studies, T. Duffy and J. Kirkley, Eds. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum, in press.
8. Cognition and Technology Group at Vanderbilt, The Jasper Project: Lessons in Curriculum, Instruction, Assessment, and Professional Development. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum, 1997.
9. H.S. Barrows, How to Design a Problem-Based Curriculum for the Preclinical Years. New York: Springer, 1985
10. S.M. Williams, "Putting case-based instruction into context: Examples from legal and medical education." J. Learning Sci., vol. 2, no. 4, pp. 367-427, 1992.
11. Sherwood, R. "Problem based multimedia software for Middle GradesScience: Development issues and an initial field study," J. Comput. Math. Sci. Teaching, vol. 21, no. 2, pp. 147-165, 2002.
12. D.L. Schwartz, S. Brophy, X. Lin, and J.D. Bransford, "Software for managing complex learning: Examples from an educational psychology course, " Educ. Technol. Res. Develop., vol. 47, no. 2, pp. 39-60, 1999.
13. G. Biswas, D.L. Schwartz, B. Bhuva, J. Bransford, D. Holton, A. Verma, and J. Pfaffman. (2002). Assessing student understanding of concepts in electricity to inform instructional decisions. Final Report for Office of Navel Research. Available: http://www.vuse.vanderbilt.edu/~biswas/Research/ile/onr/final4.html
14. D.L. Schwartz, X. Lin, S. Brophy, and J.D. Bransford, "Toward the development of flexibly adaptive instructional designs," in Instructional Design Theories and Models: Volume II, C. Reigeluth, Ed. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum, 1999.
15. N.D. Merrill, "First Principles of Instruction," Educ. Technol. Res. Develop., vol, 50, no. 3, pp. 43-50, 2002.
16. J.D. Bransford, A.L. Brown, and R.R. Cocking, How People Learn: Brain, mind, Experience, and School. Washington, DC: National Academy Press, 1999.
17. T.D. Giorgio and S. Brophy, "Challenge-based learning in biomedical engineering: A legacy cycle for biotechnology," in Proc. Amer. Soc. Eng. Educ. 2001 Conf., Albuquerque, NM, 2002.
18. M. Linn and S. Hsi, Computers, Teachers, Peers: Science Learning Partners. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 2000.
19. C. Smith, S. Carey, and M. Wiser, "On differentation: A case study of the development of size, weight and density," Cognition, vol. 21, pp. 177-237, 1985.
20. J.D. Bransford and D. Schwartz, "Rethinking transfer: A simple proposal with multiple implications," in Review of Research in Education, A. Iran-Nejad and P.D. Pearson, Eds. Washington, DC: American Educational Research Association, 1999, vol. 24, pp. 61-100.
21. S.P. Brophy and D.L. Schwartz, "Interactive analogies," in Proc. 1996 Int. Conf. Learning Sci., D. Edelson and Eric Domeshek, Eds., Evanston, IL: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education, 1998, pp. 351-356.
22. R.J. Roselli and S.P. Brophy, "Exploring an electronic polling system for the assessment of student progress in two biomedical engineering courses," in Proc. Amer. Soc. Eng. Educ. 2002 Conf., Montreal, Quebec, Canada, 2002, (CD-ROM), Session 2609, 11 pp.
23. R.J. Dufresne, W.J. Gerace, W.J. Leonard, J.P. Mestre, and L. Wenk, "Classtalk: A classroom communication system for active learning," J. Comput. Higher Educ., vol. 7, pp. 3-47, Mar. 1996.
24. H.V. Bateman, S.R. Goldman, J.R. Newbrough, and J.D. Bransford, "Students' sense ofcommunity in constructivist/collaborative learning environments," in Proc. 20th Annu. Meeting Cognitive Science Society. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum, 1998, pp. 126-131.
25. M.S. Donavan, J.D. Bransford, and J.W. Pellegrino, How People Learn By Doing. Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press, 1999.
26. G. Wiggins and J. McTighe, Understanding by Design. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development, 1997.
27. D.L. Schwartz and J.D. Bransford, "A time for telling," Cogn. Instr., vol. 16, no. 4, pp. 475-522, 1998.
28. J.M. Wilson and W.C. Jennings, "Studio courses: How information technology is changing the way we teach, on campus and off," Proc. IEEE, vol. 88, pp. 72-80, Jan. 2000.
29. J. Young, "The studio classroom," ASEE Prism, p 15, Jan. 1996.
30. J. Wilson, "The CUPLE physics studio," Phys. Teacher, vol. 32, no. 9, pp. 518-532, Dec. 1994.
31. E. Mazur, Peer Instruction: A User's Manual. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall, 1998.
32. R.J. Roselli, B. Cinnamon, P. Norris, S.P. Brophy, D. Eggers, and J. Brock, "Development of an interactive free body diagram assistant for biomechanics," in Proc. Second Joint EMBS-BMES Conf. (CD-ROM, Omnipress): 2617-2618, 2002.
33. D. Wiley, "Connecting learning objects to instructional design theory: A definition, a metaphor, and a taxonomy," in The Instructional Use of Learning Objects, D. Wiley, Ed. Bloomington, IN: Association for Instructional Technology, 2001.
34. S.P. Brophy, "Learning scientific principles through problem solving in computer supported and laboratory environments" Ph.D. dissertation, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN, 1998.
35. R.J. Roselli and S.P. Brophy, "Redesigning a biomechanics course using challenge-based instruction," IEEE Eng. Med. Biol. Mag., vol. 22, no. 4, pp. 66-70, 2003.
36. L. Howard, "Adaptative learning technologies for bioengineering education," IEEE Eng. Med. Biol. Mag., vol. 22, no. 4, pp. 58-65, 2003.