Vanderbilt's AMIGO3 project: Knowledge of how people learn enters cyberspace

Learner-Centered Theory and Practice in Distance Education: Cases From Higher Education

Volumn , Issue , 2003, Pages 209-234

  Bransford, John ^a   Vye, Nancy ^b   Bateman, Helen ^a   Brophy, Sean ^c   Roselli, Bob ^a  

^a VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b HEALTHWAYS INC   (United States)

^c VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84917078878     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4324/9781410609489     Document Type: Chapter

References (52)

1. Alexopoulou, E., & Driver, R. (1996). Small group discussion in physics: Peer interaction modes in pairs and fours. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 33, 1099-1114.
2. Auble, P. M., & Franks, J. J. (1978). The effects of effort toward comprehension on recall. Memory and Cognition, 6, 20-25.
3. Barron, B. J., Schwartz, D. L., Vye, N. J., Moore, A., Petrosino, A., Zech, L., Bransford, J. D., & CTGV. (1998). Doing with understanding: Lessons from research on problem and project-based learning. Journal of Learning Sciences 3&4, 271-312.
4. Bateman, H. V., Bransford, J. D., Goldman, S. R., & Newbrough, J. R. (2000, April). Sense of community in the classroom: Relationship to students' academic goals. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New Orleans, LA.
5. Black, P., & William, D. (1998). Assessment and classroom learning. Assessment and Education, 5(1), 7-75.
6. Bransford, J. D. (1979). Human cognition: Learning, understanding and remembering. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.
7. Bransford, J. D., & Schwartz, D. (1999). Rethinking transfer: A simple proposal with multiple implications. In A. Iran-Nejad & P. D. Pearson (Eds.), Review of research in education (Vol. 24, pp. 61-100). Washington, DC: American Educational Research Association.
8. Bransford, J. D., & Stein, B. S. (1993). The IDEAL problem solver (2nd ed.). New York: Freeman.
9. Bransford, J. D., Vye, N. J., & Bateman, H. (2002). Creating high-quality learning environments: Guidelines from research on how people learn. In P. A. Graham & N. G. Stacey (Eds.), The knowledge economy and postsecondary education: Report of a workshop (pp. 159-197). Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
10. Brophy, S. P. (2001). Exploring the implication of an expert blind spot on learning. Unpublished manuscript, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN.
11. Broudy, H. S. (1977). Types of knowledge and purposes of education. In R. C. Anderson, R. J. Spiro, & W. E. Montague (Eds. ), Schooling and the acquisition of knowledge (pp. 1-17). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
12. Brown, J. S., & Duguid, P. (2000). The social life of information. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.
13. Bruner, J. (1960). The process of education. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
14. Carey, S., & Gelman, R. (1991). The epigenesis of mind: Essays on biology and cognition. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
15. Chi, M. T. H., Feltovich, P. J., & Glaser, R. (1981). Categorization and representation of physics problems by experts and novices. Cognitive Science, 5, 121-152.
16. Cognition and Technology Group at Vanderbilt. (1990). Anchored instruction and its relationship to situated cognition. Educational Researcher, 19(6), 2-10.
17. Cognition and Technology Group at Vanderbilt. (1997). The Jasper Project: Lessons in curriculum, instruction, assessment, and professional development. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
18. Cognition and Technology Group at Vanderbilt. (2000). Adventures in anchored instruction: Lessons from beyond the ivory tower. In R. Glaser (Ed.), Advances in instructional psychology: Educational design and cognitive science (pp. 35-99). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
19. DeGroot, A. D. (1965). Thought and choice in chess. The Hague: Mouton.
20. Driver, R., Squires, A., Rushworth, P., & Wood-Robinson, V. (1994). Making sense of secondary science: Research into children's ideas. London: Routledge.
21. Duffy,T. J.,&Cunningham, D. (1996). Constructivism: Implications for the design and delivery of instruction. In D. H. Jonassen (Ed.), Handbook of research for educational communications and technology (pp. 170-198). New York: Macmillan.
22. Dweck, C. S. (1989). Motivation. In A. Lesgold & R. Glaser (Eds.), Foundations for a psychology of education (pp. 87-136). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
23. Harris, T. R., Bransford, J. D., & Brophy, S. (2002). Roles for learning sciences and learning technologies in bioengineering education.
24. Hatano, G., & Inagaki, K. (1986). Two courses of expertise. In H. Stevenson, H. Azuma, & K. Hakuta (Eds.), Child development and education in Japan (pp. 262-272). New York: Freeman.
25. Hestenes, D. (1987). Toward a modeling theory of physics instruction. American Journal of Physics, 55, 440-454.
26. Hough, B. W. (2000). Virtual communities of practice in teacher education: Assessing reflection in computer-mediated communication environments. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN.
27. Hunt, E. & Minstrell, J. (1994). A cognitive approach to the teaching of physics. In K. McGilly (Ed.), Classroom lessons: Integrating cognitive theory and classroom practice (pp. 51-74). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
28. Jenkins, J. J. (1979). Four points to remember: A tetrahedral model of memory experiments. In L. S. Cermak &F. I.M. Craik (Eds.), Levels of procession and human memory (pp. 429-446). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
29. Kolodner, J. L. (1997). Educational implications of analogy: A view from case-based reasoning. American-Psychologist, 52(1), 57-66.
30. Leonard,W. J., Dufresne, R. J., & Mestre, J. P. (1996). Using qualitative problem-solving strategies to highlight the role of conceptual knowledge in solving problems. American Journal of Physics, 64, 1495-1503.
31. Lin, X. D., & Lehman, J. (1999). Supporting learning of variable control in a computer-based biology environment:Effects of prompting college students to reflect on their own thinking. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 36, 837-858.
32. Lionni, L. (1970). Fish is fish. New York: Scholastic.
33. Michael, A. L., Klee, T., & Bransford, J. D., & Warren, S. (1993). The transition from theory to therapy: Test of two instructional methods. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 7, 139-154.
34. Moll, L. C., Tapia, J., & Whitmore, K. F. (1993). Living knowledge: The social distribution of cultural sources for thinking. In G. Saloman (Ed.), Distributed cognitions (pp. 139-163). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
35. National Research Council, Committee on Developments in the Science of Learning. (1999a). How people learn: Brain, mind, experience, and school [Online]. In J. D. Bransford, A. L. Brown, & R. R. Cocking (Eds.), Commission on Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education. Washington, DC: National Academy Press. Also available: http://www.nap.edu/html/howpeople1
36. National Research Council, Committee on Learning Research and Educational Practice. (1999b). How people learn: Bridging research and practice. In M. S. Donovan, J. D. Bransford, & J. W. Pellegrino (Eds.), Commission on Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
37. National Research Council, Committee on Developments in the Science of Learning. (2000). How people learn: Brain, mind, experience, and school [Expanded ed., Online]. In J. D. Bransford, A. L. Brown, & R. R. Cocking (Eds.), with additional material from the Committee on Learning, Research and Educational Practice. Commission on Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education. Washington, DC: National Academy Press. Also available: http://www.nap.edu/html/howpeople1
38. National Research Council, Committee on the Foundations of Assessment. (2001). Knowing what students know: The science and design of educational assessment. In J. W. Pellegrino, N. Chudowsky, & R. Glaser (Eds.), Board on Testing and Assessment, Center for Education, Division of Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
39. National Research Council, Committee on Scientific Principles for Education Research. (2002). Scientific research in education. In R. Shavelson & Lisa Towne (Eds.), Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
40. Palloff, R. M., & Pratt, K. (1999). Building learning communities in cyberspace: Effective strategies for the online classroom. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
41. Petrosino, A., & Pandy, M. (April, 2001). Incorporating learning science research in college biomechanics. Paper presented at the meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Seattle, WA.
42. PT3 Group at Vanderbilt. (2002). Three AMIGO3s: Using "anchored modular inquiry" to prepare future teachers. Educational Technology, Research and Development 50(3), 105-123. Gilda Radnor Live 1980. www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/6302877628
43. Rose, A. (2001, October). The Scope of Virtual Education K-12. Paper presented at the Vanderbilt PT3 Conference on Teacher Education and Technology, Nashville, TN.
44. Schwartz, D. L., & Bransford, J. D. (1998). A time for telling. Cognition & Instruction 16, 475-522.
45. Schwartz, D. L., Brophy, S., Lin, X. D., & Bransford, J. D. (1999). Software for managing complex learning:An example from an educational psychology course. Educational Technology Research and Development, 47, 39-59.
46. Shulman, L. S. (1987). Knowledge and teaching: Foundations of the new reform. Harvard Educational Review, 57, 1-22.
47. Vye, N. J., Burgess, K., Bransford, J. D., & Cigarran, C. (2002). Using computer-assisted case based instruction in corporate training. In P. Barker & S. Rebelsky (Eds.), Procedings of Ed Media 2002: World Conference on Educational Multimedia, Hypermedia & Telecommunication (pp. 1997-1999). Norfolk, VA:AACE.
48. Vygotsky, L. S. (1978, September/October). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
49. Weigel, V. (2000). E-learning and the tradeoff between richness and reach in higher education. Change 10-15.
50. White, B. C., & Frederiksen, J. (1998). Inquiry, modeling, and metacognition: Making science accessible to all students. Cognition and Instruction, 16(1), 39-66.
51. Wiggins, G., & McTighe, J. (1997). Understanding by design. VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
52. Williams, S. M. (1992). Putting case-based instruction into context: Examples from legal and medical education. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 2, 367-427.