Application of a quantitative model to differentiate benign from malignant breast lesions detected by dynamic, gadolinium-enhanced MRI

Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging

Volumn 6, Issue 5, 1996, Pages 743-752

  Kelcz, Frederick ^a   Santyr, Giles E ^a   Cron, Greg O ^a   Mongin, Steven J ^a  

^a University of Wisconsin Health   (United States)

Author keywords

Breast MRI; Gadolinium DTPA; Malignancy; Neoplasm

Indexed keywords

DIAGNOSTIC AGENT; GADOLINIUM;

ARTICLE; BREAST DISEASE; BREAST TUMOR; CARCINOMA; CASE REPORT; DIFFERENTIAL DIAGNOSIS; FEMALE; FIBROADENOMA; HUMAN; IMAGE PROCESSING; LABORATORY DIAGNOSIS; METHODOLOGY; MIDDLE AGED; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; THEORETICAL MODEL;

BREAST DISEASES; BREAST NEOPLASMS; CARCINOMA; DIAGNOSIS, DIFFERENTIAL; FALSE POSITIVE REACTIONS; FEMALE; FIBROADENOMA; GADOLINIUM; HUMANS; IMAGE PROCESSING, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MIDDLE AGED; MODELS, THEORETICAL; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY;

EID: 0030226069     PISSN: 10531807     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/jmri.1880060507     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Heywang SH, Fenzl G, Dietbert H, et al. MR imaging of the breast: comparison with mammography and ultrasound. J Comput Assist Tomogr 1986; 10:615-620.
2. Turner DA, Alcorn FS, Adler YT. Nuclear magnetic resonance in the diagnosis of breast cancer. Radiol Clin North Am 1988; 26:673-687.
3. Santyr GE, Henkelman RM, Bronskill MJ. Spin locking for MR imaging with application to human breast. Magn Reson Med 1989; 12:25-37.
4. Heywang SH, Bassermann, Fenzl G. MRI of the breast - histopathologic correlation. Eur J Radiol 1987; 7:175-182.
5. Heywang SH, Wolf A, Pruss E, Hilbretz T, Eiermann W, Permanetter W. MR imaging of the breast with Gd-DTPA: use and limitations. Radiology 1989; 171:95-103.
6. Harms SE, Flamig DP, Hesley KL, et al. MR imaging of the breast with rotating delivery of excitation off resonance: clinical experience with pathologic correlation. Radiology 1993; 187: 493-501.
7. Rubens D, Totterman S, Chacko AK, et al. Gadopentate dimeglumine-enhanced chemical shift MR imaging of the breast. AJR 1991; 157:267-270.
8. Kaiser WA, Zeitler E. MR Imaging of the breast: fast imaging sequences with and without Gd-DTPA. Radiology 1989; 170: 681-686.
9. Stack JP, Redmond OM, Codd B, Dervan PA, Ennis JT. Breast disease: tissue characterization with Gd-enhancement profiles. Radiology 1990; 174:491-494.
10. Hachiya J, Seki T, Okada M, Nitatori T, Korenaga T, Furuya Y. MR imaging of the breast with Gd-DTPA enhancement: comparison with mammography and ultrasonography. Radiat Med 1991; 6:232-240.
11. Gribbestad IS, Nilsen G, Fjosne H, et al. Contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging of the breast. Acta Oncol 1992; 31: 833-842.
12. Gilles R, Guinebretiere JM, Lucidarme O, et al. Nonpalpable breast tumors: diagnosis with contrasted-enhanced subtraction dynamic MR imaging. Radiology 1994; 191:625-631.
13. Boetes C, Barentsz JO, Mus RD, et al. MR characterization of suspicious breast lesions with gadolinium-enhanced turbo-FLASH subtraction technique. Radiology 1994; 193:777-781.
14. Turkat TJ, Klein BD, Polan RL, Richman RH. Dynamic MR mammography: a technique for potentially reducing the biopsy rate for benign breast disease. JMRI 1994; 4:563-568.
15. Orel SG, Schnall MD, LiVolsi VA, Troupin RH. Suspicious breast lesions: MR imaging with radiologie-pathologie correlation. Radiology 1994; 190:485-493.
16. Folkman J. Tumor angiogenesis. Adv Cancer Res 1985; 43: 175-199.
17. Mirowitz SA, Gutierrez E, Lee JKT, Brown JJ, Heiken JP. Normal abdominal enhancement patterns with dynamic gadolinium-enhanced MR imaging. Radiology 1991; 180:637-640.
18. Morgan PH, Mercer LP, Flodin NW. General model for nutritional responses of higher organisms. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1975; 72:4327-4331.
19. Chambers J, Hastie T, eds. Statistical models in S. Florence, Kentucky: Wadsworth & Brooks/Cole, 1992.
20. Pierce WB, Harms SE, Flamig DP, Griffey RH, Evans WP, Hagans JE. Three-dimensional gadolinium-enhanced MR imaging of the breast: pulse sequence with fat suppression and magnetization transfer contrast. Radiology 1991; 181:757-763.
21. Kaiser W, Reiser MD. Comparison of MR-mammography (MRM) and mammography. In: Proceedings of the 11th annual meeting of the Society of Magnetic Resonance in Medicine. Berlin: Society of Magnetic Resonance in Medicine, 1992; 954.
22. Gowland P, Mansfield P, Bullock P, Stehling M, Worthington B, Firth J. Dynamic studies of gadolinium uptake in brain tumors using inversion-recovery echo-planar imaging. Magn Reson Med 1992; 26:241-258.
23. Brix G, Semmler W, Rudiger P, Schad LR, Layer G, Lorenz WJ. Pharmacokinetic parameters in CNS Gd-DTPA enhanced MR imaging. J Comput Assist Tomogr 1991; 15:621-628.
24. Weisskoff RM, Hulka CA, Smith B, et al. Dynamic NMR imaging of the breast using echo planar imaging. In: Proceedings of the 12th annual scientific meeting of the Society of Magnetic Resonance in Medicine. New York: Society of Magnetic Resonance in Medicine, 1993; 119.
25. Van Vaals JJ, Brummer ME, Dixon WT, et al. "Keyhole" method for accelerating imaging of contrast agent uptake. JMRI 1993; 3:671-675.
26. Parker SH, Lovin JD, Jobe WE. Burke BJ, Hopper KD, Yakes WF. Nonpalpable breast lesions: stereotactic automated large-core biopsies. Radiology 1991; 180:403-407.
27. Freeman R, Hill HDW. Phase and intensity anomalies in Fourier transform NMR. J Magn Reson 1971; 4:366-383.
28. Look DC, Locker DR. Time saving in measurement of NMR and EPR relaxation times. Rev Sci Instrum 1970; 41:250-251.
29. Press H, Teukolsky JA, Vetterling W, Flannery BP, eds. Numerical recipes in C, 2nd ed. New York: Cambridge, 1992; 681-699, 408ff.