Animals in Psychology Education and Student Choice

Society and Animals

Volumn 8, Issue 2, 2000, Pages 191-212

  Cunningham, Paul F ^a  

^a RIVIER COLLEGE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ANIMALIA;

EID: 0141586930     PISSN: 10631119     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1163/156853000511087     Document Type: Review

References (68)

1. Abramson, C. I. (1994). A primer of invertebrate learning: The behavioral perspective. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
2. Abramson, C. I., Onsott, T., Edwards, S., & Bowe, K. (1996). Classical-conditioning demonstrations for elementary and advanced courses. Teaching of Psychology, 23, 26-30.
3. Acker, L. E., Goldwater, B. C., & Agnew, J. L. (1990). Sidney Slug: A computer simulation for teaching shaping without an animal laboratory. Teaching of Psychology, 17, 130-132.
4. American Association for the Advancement of Science. (1990, February). Resolution on the use of animals in research, testing, and education. Washington, DC: Author.
5. American Medical Student Association. (1993). Preamble, purposes and principles. Reston, VA: Author.
6. American Psychological Association. (1995). Behavioral research with animals. Washington, DC: Author.
7. _ (1996). Guidelines for ethical conduct in the care and use of animals. Washington, DC: Author.
8. Anton, B. S. (1995). The Biolog project: Self-monitoring as a laboratory for physiological psychology. Teaching of Psychology, 22, 130-131.
9. Association of Veterinarians for Animal Rights. (1989-1996). Alternatives to the harmful use of nonhuman animals in veterinary medical education [Brochure]. Vacaville, CA: Author.
10. Balcombe, J. (1997, January). Student/teacher conflict regarding animal dissection. The American Biology Teacher, 59, 22-25.
11. Baldwin, E. (1993). The case for animal research in psychology. Journal of Social Issues, 49, 121-131.
12. Barnard, N., & Baron, L. (1989). Alternatives to dissection. Humane Innovations and Alternatives in Animal Experimentation, 3, 92-93.
13. Benedict, J., & Stoloff, M. (1991). Animal laboratory facilities at "America's best" undergraduate colleges. American Psychologist, 46, 535-536.
14. Board of Educational Affairs. (1995). Learner-centered psychological principles: A framework for school redesign and reform. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
15. Bowd, A. (1993). Dissection as an instructional technique in secondary science. Society & Animals, 1, 83-89.
16. Bowd, A. D., & Shapiro, K. J. (1993). The case against laboratory animal research in psychology. Journal of Social Issues, 49, 133-142.
17. Cunningham, P. F., & Randour, M. L. (1998). Alternatives to the use of animals in education. Psychology Teacher Network, 8, 8, 11.
18. Devine, L. (1990, Fall). The 'rat lab:' A critique and review of alternative methods. PSYETA Bulletin, 10, 12-13.
19. Dewhurst, D. G., Hardcastle, J., Hardcastle, P. T., & Stuart, E. (1994). Comparison of a computer simulation program and a traditional laboratory practical class for teaching the principles of intestinal absorption. American Journal of Physiology, 267, S95-S104).
20. Domjan, M. & Purdy, J. E. (1995). Animal research in psychology: More than meets the eye of the general psychology student. American Psychologist, 50, 496-503.
21. Downie, R. & Meadows, J. (1995). Experience with a dissection opt-out scheme in university level biology. Journal of Biological Education, 29, 187-195.
22. Ethical Science Education Coalition. (1995). Model student "choice" dissection policy. Boston, MA: Author.
23. Fisher, R. & Ury, W. (1991). Getting to yes: Negotiating agreement without giving in. New York: Penguin Books.
24. Foundation for Biomedical Research. (1995, September). Most medical students and professors consider live-animal labs useful. FBR Facts, 2, 1.
25. Francione, G. & Charlton, A. (1992). Vivisection and dissection in the classroom: A guide to conscientious objection. Jenkintown, PA: American Anti-Vivisection Society.
26. Furnham, A. & Heyes, C. (1993). Psychology students' beliefs about animals and animal experimentation. Personality and Individual Differences, 15, 1-10.
27. Gallistel, C. R. (1981). Bell, Magendie, and the proposals to restrict the use of animals in behavioral research. American Psychologist, 40, 1140-1151.
28. Gallup, G. G., Jr. & Eddy, T. J. (1990). Animal facilities survey. American Psychologist, 45, 400-401.
29. Gallup, G. G., Jr. & Suarez, S. D. (1985, October). Alternatives to the use of animals in psychology experiments. American Psychologist, 40, 1140-1151.
30. Greenfield, C. L., Johnson, A. L., Schaeffer, D. F., & Hungerford, L. L. (1995). Comparison of surgical skills of students trained with models or live animals. Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association, 206, 1840-1845.
31. Hart, B. L. (Ed.). (1976). Experimental psychobiology: A laboratory manual. San Francisco, CA: Freeman.
32. Heim, A. (1981). The desensitization of teachers and students. In D. Paterson (Ed.). Humane education-A symposium (pp. 37-46). Burgess Hill, UK: Humane Education Council.
33. Hepner, L. (1994). Animals in education: The facts, issues and implications. Albuquerque, NM: Richmond Press.
34. Hull, D. B. (1996). Animal use in undergraduate psychology programs. Teaching of Psychology, 23, 171-174.
35. Jones, N. A., Olafson, R. P., & Sutin, J. (1978). Evaluation of a gross anatomy program without dissection. Journal of Medical Education, 53, 198-205.
36. Keith-Spiegel, P. C., Tabachnick, B. G., & Allen, M. (1993). Ethics and academia: Students' views of professors' actions. Ethics & Behavior, 3, 149-162.
37. Kelly, J. A. (1985). Alternatives to aversive procedures with animals in the psychological teaching setting. In M. W. Fox & L. D. Mickley (Eds.), Advances in animal welfare science 1985/86 (pp. 165-184). Washington, DC: The Humane Society of the United States.
38. Kemble, E. D. (1983). Insect predation by rodents: Some inexpensive experiments in comparative and physiological psychology. Teaching of Psychology, 10, 109-110.
39. LaFollette, H. & Shanks, N. (1996). Brute science: Dilemmas of animal experimentation. New York: Routledge.
40. McGovern, T. V. (Ed.). (1993). Handbook for enhancing undergraduate education in psychology. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
41. McGovern, T. V. & Reich, J. N. (1996). A comment on the Quality Principles. American Psychologist, 51, 252-255.
42. Miller, N. E. (1985). The value of behavioral research on animals. American Psychologist, 4,423-440.
43. Office of Teaching Resources in Psychology (OTRP). (1997). Project syllabus: Undergraduate syllabi-learning.
44. Orlans, F. B. (1974). Biology students as experimental subjects. The American Biology Teacher, 401-406.
45. _ (1988). Should students harm or destroy animal life? The American Biology Teacher, 50, 6-12.
46. _ (1993). In the name of science: Issues in responsible animal experimentation. New York: Oxford University Press.
47. Physicians Committee for Responsible Medicine. (1995). Alternatives in medical education: Non-animal methods. [Brochure]. Washington, DC: Author.
48. Pious, S. (1996a). Attitudes toward the use of animals in psychological research and education: Results from a national survey of psychologists. American Psychologist, 51, 1167-1180.
49. _ (1996b). Attitudes toward the use of animals in psychological research and education: Results from a national survey of psychology majors. Psychological Science, 7, 352-358.
50. Psychologists for the Ethical Treatment of Animals. (1992, May). Student rights option policy. PSYETA Update, 2.
51. _ (1993, Winter). Paper tigers: APA's new and unimproved guidelines. PSYETA Newsletter, 2-3.
52. _ (1995, January). Student rights option: Important developments. PSYETA Newsletter, 1-2.
53. _ (1997). The student rights option [Brochure]. Washington Grove, MD 20880: Author.
54. Robinson, D. N. (1990). Comment on animal research labs. American Psychologist, (45), 1269.
55. Rowan, A. N. & Weer, J. C. (Eds.). (1993) Biology education and animals: Opportunities and issues (Summary Proceedings). North Grafton, MA: Tufts Center for Animals and Public Policy.
56. Russell, W. M. S. & Burch, R. L. (1952). The principles of humane experimental techniques. Herts, UK: Universities Federation for Animal Welfare.
57. Samsel, R. W., Schmidt, G. A., Hall, J. B., Wood, L. D. H., Shroff, S. G., & Schumacker, P. T. (1994). Cardiovascular physiology teaching: Computer simulations vs. animal demonstrations. Advances in Physiology Education, 11, S36-S46.
58. Schumacher, S. J. (1982). An alternative to the traditional psychological psychology laboratory: Identification of an unknown drug through behavioral testing. Teaching of Psychology, 9, 239-241.
59. Shapiro, K. J. (1988). Alternatives in education: A philosophical and pedagogical reflection. International Foundation for Ethical Research Newsletter, 2, 3.
60. Shapiro, K. J. & Field, P. B. (1987). A new scale of invasiveness in animal experimentation. PSYETA Bulletin, 7, 5-7.
61. _ (1988). A new invasiveness scale: Its role in reducing animal distress. Humane Innovations and Alternatives in Animal Experimentation, 2, 43-46.
62. Skinner, J. E. (1971). Neuroscience: A laboratory manual. Philadelphia, PA: Saunders.
63. Stoloff, M. L. & Couch, J. V. (Eds.). (1992) Computer use in psychology: A directory of software (3rd ed.). Washington, DG: American Psychological Association.
64. Thomas, G. V. & Blackman, D. (1992). The future of animal studies in psychology. American Psychologist (46), 1679.
65. Thomas, M. H., Horton, R. W., Lippincott, E. L., & Drabman, R. S. (1977). Desensitization to real-life aggression as a function of exposure to television violence. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 35, 450.
66. Ware, M. E., & Johnson, D. E. (Eds.). (1996). Handbook of demonstrations and activities in teaching psychology: Physiological-comparative, perception, learning, cognitive, and developmental (Vol. 2). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
67. Wellman, P. J. (1985). Laboratory exercises in physiological psychology. Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
68. Wilsoncroft, W. E. & Law, O. T. (1967). Laboratory manual for physiological psychology. Goleta, CA: Psychonomic Press.