Attitudes Toward the Use of Animals in Psychological Research and Education: Results from a National Survey of Psychologists

American Psychologist

Volumn 51, Issue 11, 1996, Pages 1167-1180

  Pious, S ^a  

^a WESLEYAN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 1542532201     PISSN: 0003066X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1037//0003-066x.51.11.1167     Document Type: Article

References (40)

1. American Association for the Advancement of Science. (1990, February 19). Resolution on the use of animals in research, testing, and education. Washington, DC: Author.
2. American Medical Association. (1989, April). AMA surveys of physician and public opinion on health care issues: 1989. Chicago: Author.
3. American Psychological Association. (1992). Guidelines for ethical conduct in the care and use of animals. Washington, DC: Author.
4. American Psychological Association, Office of Demographic, Employment, and Educational Research. (1993). [Demographic characteristics of APA members by membership status]. Unpublished raw data.
5. Animal Industry Foundation. (1989, April). Survey results on how Americans view modern livestock farming (Report No. CR 2765). Arlington, VA: Author.
6. Associated Press. (1985). [Data available from POLL computer database]. Storrs, CT: Roper Center for Public Opinion.
7. Benedict, J., & Stoloff, M. (1991). Animal laboratory facilities at "America's best" undergraduate colleges. American Psychologist, 46, 535-536.
8. Bowd, A. D., & Shapiro, K. J. (1993). The case against laboratory animal research in psychology. Journal of Social Issues, 49, 133-142.
9. Committee on Animal Research and Experimentation. (1981). Guidelines for the use of animals in school science behavior projects. American Psychologist, 36, 686.
10. Dillman, D. A. (1978). Mail and telephone surveys: The total design method. New York: Wiley.
11. Domjan, M., & Purdy, J. E. (1995). Animal research in psychology: More than meets the eye of the general psychology student. American Psychologist, 50, 496-503.
12. Driscoll, J. W. (1992). Attitudes toward animal use. Anthrozoös, 5, 32-39.
13. Foundation for Biomedical Research. (1985). Members of the American public comment on the use of animals in medical research and testing. (Available from the Foundation for Biomedical Research, 818 Connecticut Avenue, NW, Suite 303, Washington, DC 20006)
14. Fox, M. W. (1990). Inhumane society: The American way of exploiting animals. New York: St. Martin's Press.
15. Gallup, G. G., Jr., & Eddy, T. J. (1990). Animal facilities survey. American Psychologist, 45, 400-401.
16. Gallup, G. G., Jr., & Suarez, S. D. (1985). Alternatives to the use of animals in psychological research. American Psychologist, 40, 1104-1111.
17. Giannelli, M. A. (1986). Three blind mice, see how they run: A critique of behavioral research with animals. In M. W. Fox & L. D. Mickley (Eds.), Advances in animal welfare science 1985 (pp. 109-163). Boston: Martinus Nijhoff.
18. Groller, I. (1990, May). Do animals have rights? Parents, 33.
19. Huskey, C. A. (1991). Attitudes toward animal research among contemporary psychologists. Humane Innovations and Alternatives, 5, 258-262.
20. Jacobs, E., & Worcester, R. (1990). We British: Britain under the MORIscope. London: Weidenfeld and Nicolson.
21. Jasper, J. M., & Nelkin, D. (1992). The animal rights crusade: The growth of a moral protest. New York: Free Press.
22. Kelly, J. A. (1986). Psychological research and the rights of animals: Disagreement with Miller. American Psychologist, 41, 839-841.
23. Man's mirror. (1991, November 16). The Economist, 21-22, 24.
24. Miller, N. E. (1985). The value of behavioral research on animals. American Psychologist, 40, 423-440.
25. National Opinion Research Center. (1948). [Data available from POLL computer database]. Storrs, CT: Roper Center for Public Opinion.
26. National Research Council. (1996). Guide for the care and use of laboratory animals. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
27. National Science Board. (1991). Science & engineering indicators (10th ed.). Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
28. Novak, M. A., & Petto, A. J. (Eds.). (1991). Through the looking glass: Issues of psychological well-being in captive nonhuman primates. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
29. Orlans, F. B. (1993). In the name of science: Issues in responsible animal experimentation. New York: Oxford University Press.
30. Orlans, F. B. (1994). Data on animal experimentation in the United States: What they do and do not show. Perspectives in Biology and Medicine, 37, 217-231.
31. Phillips, M. T., & Sechzer, J. A. (1989). Animal research and ethical conflict: An analysis of the scientific literature: 1966-1986. New York: Springer-Verlag.
32. Pifer, L., Shimizu, K., & Pifer, R. (1994). Public attitudes toward animal research: Some international comparisons. Society and Animals, 2, 95-113.
33. Pion, G. M., Mednick, M. T., Astin, H. S., Hall, C. C. I., Kenkel, M. B., Keita, G. P., Kohout, J. L., & Kelleher, J. C. (1996). The shifting gender composition of psychology: Trends and implications for the discipline. American Psychologist, 51, 509-528.
34. Pious, S. (1996). Attitudes toward the use of animals in psychological research and education: Results from a national survey of psychology majors. Psychological Science, 7, 352-358.
35. Robinson, D. N. (1990). Comment on animal research labs. American Psychologist, 45, 1269.
36. Rowan, A. N. (1994, March). Laboratory animal numbers: Trends and problems. Animal Policy Report, 8, 1-3.
37. Rowan, A. N., & Loew, F. M. (1995). The animal research controversy: Protest, process & public policy. North Grafton, MA: Tufts University, Center for Animals and Public Policy.
38. Thomas, G. V., & Blackman, D. (1992). The future of animal studies in psychology. American Psychologist, 47, 1679.
39. Ulrich, R. E. (1991). Animal rights, animal wrongs and the question of balance. Psychological Science, 2, 197-201.
40. U.S. Animal Welfare Act, 7 U.S.C. §§ 2131-2157 (1966).